Case law

Sherman-Engram Realty Corp. v. Feriola

23 Misc. 2d 245 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1960

Y. 599 ) a variance was sought to erect an office building in a residential district; in Matter of Clark v. Board of Zoning Appeals ( 301 N. … Y. 86 ) the owner sought a variance to permit the erection of a funeral home in a residential zoned area; in *247 Matter of Taxpayers’ Assn. v. Board of Appeals ( 301 N.

Woodruff v. Cook

25 Barb. 505 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1857

(Phœnix v. Dey, 5 John. 412 . Sprague v. Kneeland, 12 Wend. 161 . Brown v. *511 Mailler, 2 Kernan, 118.) … (See Noble v. Smith, 2 John. 52 ; Grangiac v. Arden, 10 id. 293; Cook v. Husted, 12 id. 188 ; 14 Barb. 243 ; 19 id. 631.)

Dater v. Wellington

1 Hill & Den. 319 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1841

(Fidler v. Cooper, 19 Wend. 285, 288 , et seq. and the cases there cited by Bronson, J.) That is to say, the arbitrators had power to award against Wellington alone. … See Browning v. Wheeler, ( 24 Wend. 258 , 9.)

City of Buffalo v. New York Telephone Co.

165 Misc. 904 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1937

Co. v. Childs Co. ( 253 N. … (Matter of State Treasurer v. Vanderbilt, 220 App. Div. 61 ; Isola v. Weber, 147 N. Y. 329 ; O’Reüly v. Utah, N. & C.

Bolton v. Village of New Rochelle

32 N.Y.S. 442 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1895

Noonan v. City of Albany, 79 N. Y. 470 ; Seifert v. City of Brooklyn, 101 N. Y. 136 , 4 N. E. 321 ; Stoddard v. Village of Saratoga Springs, 127 N. Y. 261 , 27 N. E. 1030 . … Supp. 949 ; Ehrgott v. Mayor, etc., 96 N. Y. 273 ; Pettengill v. City of Yonkers, 116 N. Y. 558 , 22 N. E. 1095 .

People v. Chapman

4 Park. Cr. 56 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1858

The note set forth in the indictment is prima facie an instrument in writing evidencing an indebtedness to the amount expressed, by the defendant Chapman to Board- . man, the prosecutor. … The case of Fenton v. The People ( 4 Hill, 126 ), is regarded by the counsel for the people as conclusive in support of this proposition.

In re of Certain Freeholders in the Town of Owasco

13 N.Y. St. Rep. 9 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1888

People v. Board of Supervisors, 93 N. Y., 397 . … Cross v. Morristown, 18 N. J. Eq., 305; State v. Morristown, 33 N. J., 57; Dillon on Municipal Corporations, §§ 534-538 inclusive.

Dime Savings Bank v. Sherman

64 Misc. 2d 457 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1970

more than four months after the report and is, therefore, untimely (Beal Property Actions and Proceedings Law, § 1355, subd. 2) that irregularity will be disregarded absent any showing of prejudice (Sibley Realty Corp. v. … Corp. v. Finch, 8 A D 2d 869; Lona Is. City Sav. & Loan Assn. v. Brown, 33 Misc 2d 996 ; see CPLB 2001, 2004).

Greaves v. American Institute for Scientific Research

114 Misc. 413 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1921

In Beers v. New York Life Ins. Co., 66 Hun, 75 , and Carney v. New York Life Ins. Co., 162 N. … Usher v. New York C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 76 App. Div. 422 ; affd., 179 N. Y. 544 ; Montwil v. Am. Locomotive Co., 159 N. Y. Supp. 21 .

Wood v. La Rose

67 Misc. 2d 597 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 6, 1971

Hence, I again discern no difference between changes made by a board of review and changes made by the assessors where they are such board of review. … Co. v. Board of Supervisors of Erie County, 48 N. Y. 93 ; National Bank of Chemung v. City of Elmira, 6 Lans. 116 ).

Ching-Leou Liu v. Eugenio Maria De Hostos Community College

17 Misc. 3d 663 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 2, 2007

City of New York, 49 AD2d 565 ; Smith v. City of New York, 120 Misc 2d 868 ; Grossman v. City of New York, 71 Misc 2d 234 ; *666 Rosenthal v. Walsh, 69 Misc 2d 612 ; Spitalnik v. City of New York, 56 Misc 2d 183 ; cf. … Clift v. City of Syracuse, 45 AD2d 596 ; Vaccaro v. Board of Educ., 54 Misc 2d 206 ).” (Matter of Rubinstein v Simpson, 109 AD2d 885, 886 [2d Dept 1985].)

Price v. Shipps

16 Barb. 585 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1853

(Mickles v. Colvin, 4 Barb. 304 . Root v. French, 13 Wend. 570 . Williams v. Smith, 2 Hill, 301 .) … (Herkimer County Bank v. Brown, 6 Hill, 232 . Knower v. Barnard, 5 Id. 378. Ball v. Shell, 21 Wend. 222 . Benjamin v. Smith , 12 Id. 404 .)

Talmage v. Hunting

39 Barb. 654 · New York Supreme Court · May 11, 1863

By the Court, Brown, J. … In Doughty v.

In re the Arbitration between Bear, Stearns & Co. & Weiss

104 Misc. 2d 876 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1980

, 424 F Supp 55, 56-57 ; Macchiavelli v Shearson, Hammill & Co., 384 F Supp 21, 30-31 ; Stockwell v Reynolds & Co., 252 F Supp 215, 217, 220; Robinson v Bache & Co., 227 F Supp 456, 457-458 ). … of Governors of the New York Stock Exchange or the Board of Governors of the American Stock Exchange as I may elect.”

People ex rel. Queens County Water Co. v. Woodbury

67 Misc. 490 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1910

City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Company, 212 U. S. 1 . … Co. v. Woodbury, ante, page 481.

Smith v. Cranford

32 N.Y.S. 375 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1895

BROWN, P. J. The defendants, from September to November, 1890, were engaged as contractors with the city of Brooklyn in constructing upon the city’s land an aqueduct in aid of the city’s water supply. … Bank v. De Grauw, 23 Wend. 342 ; Noe v. Christie, 51 N. Y. 270 ; Kromer v. Heim, 75 N. Y. 574 . The referee properly ruled that the agreement was executory, and was not a bar to the maintenance of this action.

Hargett v. Jefferson

125 Misc. 2d 210 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 16, 1984

The stipulated facts show that Anna V. … (Matter of Amalfitano v Sadowski, 51 NY2d 719 .)

Keen v. Schneider

202 Misc. 298 · New York Supreme Court · May 12, 1952

One purpose of such association was to give defendant enough cases to handle in order to qualify him as a diplómate of the American Board of Urology. … (Webster v. Williams, 62 Ark. 101 ; Storer v. Brock, 351 Ill. 643 , affg. 267 Ill. App. 138 ; Ryan v. Hamilton, 205 Ill. 191 ; Cole v. Edwards, 93 Iowa, 477 ; Mills v. Cleveland, 87 Kan. 549 ; Hill v. Gudgell, 9 Ky. L.

Long Park, Inc. v. Trenton-New Brunswick Theatres Co.

188 Misc. 793 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1946

in the abstract, the pubEc poEcy of the State appEcable to agreements subscribed to by all the stockholders of a corporation can best be stated in the language of the Court of Appeals in its dictum in the case of Clark v. … Neither was there any showing that the rights of the plaintiff had been prejudiced by the action of “ Trenton ” or its board of directors.

McCray v. McCray

30 Barb. 633 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1860

It should not have been rejected upon any adjudication in this state ; (see Parlchurst v. Van Cortland, 14 John. 15 ; Malins v. … Brown, 4 Comst. 403 ;) and I think the weight of authority in other states and in England is in favor of its admission.