Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

0.40s

  • In re Love Canal Actions

    145 Misc. 2d 1076 · New York Supreme Court · May 17, 1989

    The old canal property was transferred on April 28, 1953 to the Board of Education of the City of Niagara Falls (School Board) by deed indicating that chemical wastes had been buried on the *1078 property and required that … The School Board erected the 99th Street School adjacent to, but not on, the canal property.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Cromwell v. Stephens

    3 Abb. Pr. 26 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1867

    In Dausey v. … In Smith v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Waters v. City of New York

    43 Misc. 154 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1904

    Callahan v. Board of Education, 78 App. Div. 505 ; affd., 174 N. Y. 169 ), and such position is thereupon made vacant. … Lodholz v. Knox, 58 App. Div. 541 , and Powell v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • New York Republican State Committee v. New York State Commission on Government Integrity

    138 Misc. 2d 790 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1988

    (Matter of Windsor Park Nursing Home v Hynes, 42 NY2d 243, 246 .) … Board for Professional Medical Conduct]) or Myerson v Lentini Bros.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Eisenberg v. Reasenberg

    133 Misc. 190 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1928

    S. 532 ) and Vogel v. … (Villemin v. Brown, 193 App. Div. 777 ; Tower v. Crosby, 214 id. 392; Thorner v. Samuels, 122 Misc. 139 ; affd., 209 App. Div. 863 ; Stephens v. Pattou, 208 id. 63.)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re the Arbitration between Brookhaven-Comsewogue Union Free School District & Port Jefferson Station Teachers Ass'n

    86 Misc. 620 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1975

    Summarizing this latter provision, Chief Judge Fuld, in the majority opinion in Board of Educ. v Associated Teachers of Huntington ( 30 NY2d 122, 127 ), said: "In other words, the validity of a provision found in a collective … Illustrative of this dichotomy and distinction are Matter of West Irondequoit Teachers Assn. v Helsby ( 35 NY2d 46 ) and Matter of Board of Educ. v Associated Teachers of Huntington ( 30 NY2d 122 , supra).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Torre v. Heffernan

    188 Misc. 284 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1946

    The Board of Elections has ruled out the designating petition of Torre, and the movant here seeks to reinstate that petition. … There is called to the court’s attention the decision of the Court of Appeals in Matter of King v. Cohen ( 293 N. Y. 435 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re Washington Park

    15 Abb. Pr. 148 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1873

    In the case of King v. … In Stone v. Commercial R.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Blossom v. Champion & Woodhull

    37 Barb. 554 · New York Supreme Court · May 5, 1862

    (Saltus v. Everett, 20 Wend. 267 . Brower v. Peabody, 3 Kern. 122.) … The following cases are adverse to the claim of the vessel: Bailey v. Damon, ( 3 Gray, 92 ;) Clewson v. Davidson, ( 5 Binn. 392, 401 ;) Curling v. Long, (1 Bos. & P. 634.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. City of New York

    118 Misc. 2d 227 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1983

    (Matter of Talamo v Murphy, 38 NY2d 637 ; Matter of Bergstein v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 318 ; Matter of Wilborn v Starr, 58 AD2d 785 .) … (Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564; Bishop v Wood, 426 US 341 ; Paul v Davis, 424 US 693 ; Russell v Hodges, 470 F2d 212.) The petition is dismissed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kronfeld v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

    81 Misc. 2d 557 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1975

    (Lachs v Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, 306 NY 357 .) … (See Steven v Fidelity and Cas. Co. of N. Y., 27 Cal Rptr 172; Rosen v Fidelity & Cas. Co. of N. Y., 162 F Supp 211 ; Fidelity & Cas. Co. of N. Y. v Smith, 189 F2d 315; cf: Mack v Commercial Ins.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People v. New York Central Rail Road

    34 Barb. 123 · New York Supreme Court · May 13, 1861

    Such a power has been repeatedly exercised or conferred upon the canal board. The tolls have been so graduated as to promote trade, or to increase the revenue, or both. … Emott, Brown and Scrugham, Justices.]

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Harvey v. Finnick

    111 Misc. 2d 197 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1981

    (Matter of Board of Educ. v Allen, 6 NY2d 127 ; County of Saratoga v Saratoga Harness Racing Assn., 4 NY2d 622 ; Cimo v State of New York, 306 NY 143 ; People v Smith, 69 NY 175 .) … (Farrington v Pinckney, supra; Robinson v County of Broome, 195 Misc 24, 30 ; St.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Mayor

    9 N.Y. St. Rep. 247 · New York Supreme Court · May 13, 1887

    Ham v. Mayor, 70 N. Y., 459 ; Mayor v. Bailey 2 Denio, 433 ; Smith v. City of Rochester, 76 N. Y., 506 ; Maxmilian v. Mayor, etc., 2 Hun, 263 ; affirmed, 62 N. Y., 160 ; Donovan v. … Board of Education, 85 id., 117; Morrison v. Lawrence, 98 Mass., 219 ; Barney v. Lowell, id., 570; Fisher v. Boston, 104 id., 87; N. Y. and Brooklyn Saw Mill Co. v. Brooklyn, 71 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reynolds v. Ward

    5 Wend. 501 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1830

    Hubbly v. Brown & Nichols, 16 Johns. R. 70. In this case the court say they regard the endorser in the nature of a surety, and the maker of the note as the principal debtor. It was said by Kent, C. … Best, in the case of Philpot v. Briant, 4 Bing. 717, vouches for the correctness of the case of Arundle Bank v. Goble, and most distinctly reiterates the same principle.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Rondout Savings Bank v. City of Kingston

    144 Misc. 880 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1932

    This communication stated that $5,000 would be required for the board of health because of a smallpox and infantile epidemic; that $30,000 would be required for the board of public welfare, because of extraordinary expenditures … (Matter of Shaddock v. Schwartz, 246 N. Y. 288 .) Orders may be entered denying the motions of plaintiffs, with ten dollars costs in each case.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Linardos

    104 Misc. 2d 56 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1980

    V. … In People v Brown ( 87 Misc 2d 403 ) and in Matter of Reports of Nassau County Grand Jury ( 87 Misc 2d 453 ), the defect alleged was the refusal to permit direct questioning of the witness by the grand jurors.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • National Bank of the Republic v. Navassa Phosphate Co.

    8 N.Y.S. 929 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1890

    Ba nk v. St. Anthony's Church, 109 N. Y. 512 , 17 N. E. Rep. 408; McCullough v. Moss, 5 Denio, 567 ; Bridge Co. v. Bachman, 66 N. Y. 262 . … The only power conferred upon the president by the by-laws was that of presiding at meetings of the board of trustees. PTo resolution of the board granting further power was produced.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Stenovich v. Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz

    195 Misc. 2d 99 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 2, 2003

    Morgan & Co. expressing the view that from a ‘financial point of view’ the Wells Fargo offer was fair, the Board of Directors knew J.P. … (Babcock v Jackson, 12 NY2d 473 ; Erie R.R. Co. v Tompkins, 304 US 64 [1938]; Tartaglia v Paul Revere Life Ins.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • People v. Rosen

    45 Misc. 2d 789 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1965

    Brown, 3 Misc 2d 969 ; People ex rel. Jachson v. Weaver, 279 App. Div. 88 ; People ex rel. Hand v. Prison Bd. of Sing Sing, 191 App. … People v. Nagler, 21 A D 2d 490). That is not the case here. The case of People v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.