Case law

In re Pennie

19 Abb. N. Cas. 117 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1887

. *119 It is made the duty of each member of the board (§ 9) to attend at the office of the board at the time mentioned in such notice, and at such place and time all bids for doing the work or for providing the materials … Y. *122 388 ; Merritt v. Village of Portchester, 71 N. Y. 309 ; Matter of Gantz, 85 N. Y. 536 ).

In re Kane

71 Misc. 163 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1911

Balcom v. … The case of Matter of Duell v. Glynn, 191 N.

Commonwealth ex rel. Ritter v. Schultz

3 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 322 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1816

They came on board in the usual way, and made such an agreement for their passage as is commonly made. … In the case of the Com. v. Keppele, 2 Dal. Rep. 197 . this subject was materially considered, as appears from the opinion of Judge Bradford, who, as is well known, was remarkable for deep and accurate research.

Dwelle-Kaiser Co. v. Frid

139 Misc. 83 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1931

(Italian Mosaic Co. v. City of Niagara Falls, 131 Misc. 281 , citing Albany B. S. Co. v. Eastern B. & S. Co., 235 N. Y. 432 ; Edison El. Illuminating Co. v. Frick Co., 221 id. 1.) … The same question was raised in the case of Bluff Point Stone Co. v. U. S. Fidelity Co. ( 180 App.

Nichols v. Mead

2 Lans. 222 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1870

(Mattison v. Baucus, 1 N. Y., 205 ; Galen v. Brown, 22 id., 37; Hall v. Sampson, 35 id., 274.) … (Butler v. Miller, 1 N. Y., 406 .) When payment is made according to the condition of the mortgage, the title reverts to the mortgagors in every case. That is one of the incidents of a defeasible sale.

In re Bewley

101 Misc. 248 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1917

Sherwood v. Board of Canvassers, 129 N. … Similarly here, in determining the action to be taken by the board of elections, the court must determine the question of eligibility in order that the board of elections may comply with the statute law.

Merchants' National Bank v. Supervisors of New York

5 Thomp. & Cook 393 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1875

The judgment of the Supreme Court referred to was pronounced at the December term, 1863, in tire case of Bank of Commerce v. N. Y. … The court below was doubtless controlled by the case of Bank of Commonwealth v. Mayor of New York, 43 N.

Boland v. People

32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 423 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1881

(Stevens v. Com., 6 Met., 241 .) See also to the same general effect Com. v. Harney ( 10 Met., 422 ); Com. v. Hulbert (12 id., 446); Com. v. Brown ( 14 Gray, 419 , 430, 431); State v. Fletcher ( 18 Mo., 425 ); State v. … {People v. Jackson, 3 Hill, 92 ; Dedieu v. People, 22 N. Y., 178, 184 ; White v. People, 32 id., 465, 469 ; Dawson v. People, 25 id., 399, 403; Lohman v. People, 1 Comst., 379.)

People ex rel. Weston v. McClave

10 N.Y.S. 764 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1890

People v. Police Com'rs, 93 N. Y. 97 . … As was said in the case of the People v.

People v. Madera

153 Misc. 2d 366 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1992

The defendant was wearing a jacket with light brown sleeves. Clohessy said he fit the description. As the officers approached the three men, the defendant ran away. … Further, the jacket defendant was wearing was not one with a white stripe, but one with light brown sleeves.

Bank of the United States v. Davis

2 Hill & Den. 451 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1842

(Hammett v. Yea, 1 Bos. & Pull. 144; Dunham, v. Gould, 16 John. Rep. 375 ; Merritt v. Benton, 10 Wend. 116 ; Steel v. Whipple, 21 id. 105.) But not one of these considerations exists in this case. … And see Howard v. Ives, ( 1 Hill, 263 , 4, 5.) See National Bank v. Norton, (1 Hill’s Rep. 572, 577 to 580.

Coolidge & Oliver v. New-York Firemen Insurance

14 Johns. 308 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1817

Upon the obligation.of the assured to have the necessary (jocuments on board, showing the national character of thé vessel, and whether there is legal proof that such documents were on board at the time of the capture. * … We have decided, (Robinson v. Marine Ins. Co., 2 Johns.

Champlin v. Johnson

39 Barb. 606 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 1, 1862

(Butler v. Miller, 1 Comst. 496.) Upon a failure of the mortgagor to perform the condition of the mortgage the mortgagee acquires an absolute title to the chattel. (Brown v. Bement, 8 John. 96 . Otis v. … Langdon v. Buel, 9 Wend. 80 . Patchin v. Pierce, 12 id. 61. Dane v. Mallory, 16 Barb. 46 . Stewart v. Slater, 6 Duer, 99 .) In the case of Stewart v.

Smith v. Floyd

18 Barb. 522 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1854

(Lawrence v. Barker, 5 Wend. 301 . Doane v. Eddy, 16 Id. 523. Ford v. Monroe, 20 Id. 210.) … Dean, Brown and Rockwell , Justices.]

McQuade v. Cook

193 Misc. 435 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1948

(Locke v. Pembroke, 280 N. Y. 430 .) … (Doyle v. Chatham & Phenix Nat. Bank, 219 App. Div. 522 .)

Huber v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

26 Misc. 2d 563 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1960

The reasons for the board’s actions, while they may be well founded, are not important to this motion. … Corporation Law, § 10.) *565 The cases applying this section have given the stockholder an absolute right to the inspection sought here except in those cases when the lack of good faith of the petitioner is shown (Matter of Tate v.

Cox v. James

59 Barb. 144 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1869

In the case of Badeau v. … Brown, J., delivering the opinion of the court, repeats the rule laid down in Badeau v.

Woods v. McClure

42 Misc. 8 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1903

The views heretofore expressed find confirmation in the cases of Pope v. Kelly, 30 App. Div.. 253; O’Brien v. Blaut, 5 id. 223; Kolel Am. Vatiferes Jerusalem v. Eliach, 29 Misc. Rep. 499 ; Lewis v. Howe, 64 App. … Brown, 49 App. Div. 508 . The latter case, as decided by the Appellate Division, would be an authority supporting the defendants’ contention here. But it was reversed by the Court of Appeals, 166 ET.

Greenwood v. Brodhead

8 Barb. 593 · New York Supreme Court · May 28, 1850

(Hendricks v. Robinson, 2 John. Ch. Rep. 283. Brinckerhoof v. Brown, 4 Id. 671.) In Kirby v. Shoemaker, ( 3 Barb. Ch. … (Corning v. White, 2 Paige, 567 . Edmeston v. Lyde, 1 Id. 637 . Wakeman v. Grover, 4 Id. 23.) Until such lien is obtained the partners have full power to make any bona fide sale of the property they think proper.

Five Boro Electrical Contractors Ass'n. v. City of New York

61 Misc. 2d 1050 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1970

Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 275 App. Div. 577 , 586, affd. 300 N. Y. 611 ; Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U. … Co. v. Brownell ( 294 U.