Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.05s
47 Misc. 2d 411 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1965
It is applicable to criminal proceedings only and a departmental trial is not a criminal prosecution (McGillicuddy v. Monaghan, 201 Misc. 650 ). In Consolidated Edison Co. of N. Y. v. Murtagh ( 280 App. … The question appears to be answered in Darweger v. Staats ( 267 N. Y. 290, 306 ).
Cited 4 timesPublished36 Misc. 2d 804 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1962
When Sophia vacated the premises, the plaintiff took complete possession thereof, boarded up the windows and obtained the key to the house. He refused to give the key to the defendants at any time. … (Ibid., pp. 304, 307; followed in Brown v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co., 117 N. Y. 266, 273 ; see, also, Fish v. Hayward, 28 Hun 456 , 458, affd. 93 N. Y. 646 .) The extension contract may be proved under a general denial.
Cited 0 timesPublished19 Misc. 2d 475 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 8, 1959
(Wormser v. Brown, 149 N. Y. 163 ; Young v. Campbell, 75 N. Y. 525 ; Paul v. Munger, 47 N. Y. 469 ; Ross v. City of Schenectady, 259 App. Div. 774 ; Town of Mamaroneck v. New York Inter-Urban Water Co., 209 App. … (Sylvester v. Bernstein, 283 App. Div. 333 ; Schumaker v. Mather, 133 N. Y. 590 ; Blumberg v. Romer, 168 Misc. 169 .)
Cited 7 timesPublishedNew York, Westchester & Boston Railroad v. City of New York
90 Misc. 178 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1915
Hatch v. Syracuse, B. & N. Y. R. R. Co., 50 Hun, 64 ; Allen v. Buffalo, R. & P. R. R. Co., 151 N. Y. 434 . … But it is suggested by the plaintiff *184 that under the terms of- the ordinance the determination of the sufficiency of the plans of the structure was committed to the board of estimate and apportionment; that such board
Cited 0 timesPublished73 Misc. 573 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1911
The return of an order to show cause, granted upon the application of the plaintiffs, why an injunction pendente lite 'against the State Board of Highway Commissioners should not be granted, restraining said board from entering … Aside, however, from the merits, I am of the opinion that I am bound by the determination of this court in Long v. Johnson, 10 Hisc. Rep. 308.
Cited 0 timesPublished71 Misc. 2d 1 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1972
Because it did not become timely known to the plaintiffs that a cause of action will lie against the Kenilworth Fire District No. 2 and the Board of Fire Commissioners of the Town of Tonawanda, New York, the requirements … (Sikora v. Keillor, 17 A D 2d 6 [2d Dept., 1962].)
Cited 0 timesPublishedSt. Lawrence County National Bank v. Watkins
135 N.Y.S. 461 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1912
Fulton v. Varney, 117 App. Div. 572, 575 , 102 N. Y. Supp. 572 ; Browning, King & Co. v. Terwilliger, 144 App. Div. 516, 519 . 129 N. Y. Supp. 431 ; Czerney v. Haas, 144 App. Div. 430, 434 , 129 N. Y. Supp. 537 . … That case was cited with approval in the case of Browning, King & Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRutgers Female College v. Tallman
31 N.Y.S. 159 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1894
The last meeting of the board of trustees was held at said premises on the 18th of April, 1882. … Seymour v. McKinstry, 106 N. Y. 230 , 12 N. E. 348 , and 14 N. E. 94 .
Cited 1 timesPublished199 Misc. 906 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1951
Since none of the parties hereto has ever applied to the board of appeals for the permit mentioned in section 35, defendants are in no position to question the constitutionality of the statute. (Cf. Kresge Co. v. … (Matter of Kaltenbach v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 274 N. Y. 34 ; Marcus v. Village of Mamaroneck, 283 N. Y. 325, 330 .)
Cited 6 timesPublishedVillage of Southampton v. Tekworth
69 Misc. 2d 291 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1972
Defendant appealed the decision of the Building Inspector to the Village Board, which conducted a hearing on July 8, 1971, and on July 15, 1971 the Village Board denied defendant’s appeal. … (Price v. Village of Freeport, 60 Misc 2d 888 .)
Cited 2 timesPublished70 Misc. 2d 1001 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 17, 1972
The respondents cite Matter of Greitzer v. Power (10 A D 2d 921). … The decision in Greitzer (supra) has been somewhat diluted by Matter of Delaney v. Power (19 A D 2d 779, affd. 13 N Y 2d 867).
Cited 1 timesPublished36 Barb. 226 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1862
(Peck v. Village of Batavia, 32 Barb. 634 .) … Bmott, Brown and Scrugham, Justices.]
Cited 15 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Stapleton v. Bell
7 N.Y.S. 701 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1889
In People v. … In the case of People v. Pease, 27 N.
Cited 2 timesPublished11 Misc. 2d 8 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1957
Williams v. People, 24 N. Y. 405, 409 ; Brown v. Manufacturers Trust Co., 278 N. Y. 317, 324 .) … of its decision, has no application here for three cogent reasons: First, a forfeiture of rights was the subject; second, a purely factual question thereof was involved; and third, a provision in the agreement made the board
Cited 18 timesPublishedW. F. & R. Boat Builders, Inc. v. Hammond
142 Misc. 323 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1931
(Van Derveer & Son v. Canzono, 206 App. Div. 130 ; Nelson v. Gibson, 143 id. 894, 898; White v. Gray’s Sons, 96 id. 154, 156.) … (Spitaleri v. Brown, 163 App. Div. 644 ; Crump v. Wissner, Id. 47; Sigal v. Hatch Co., 61 Misc. 332 .)
Cited 2 timesPublished4 Lans. 119 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1871
In The People v. … The case of Regina v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMercantile National Bank v. Mayor of New York
27 Misc. 32 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1899
Benefit Life Ins Co. v. Board of Supervisors (Ct. App.). 2 Abb. (N. S.) 233; Rome, etc., R. R. Co. v. Smith, 39 Hun, 337 ; Susquehanna Bk. v. Board of Supervisors, 25 N. Y. 312 ; Western R. R. Co. v. Nolan, 48 N. … Miller v. Board of Police (Ct. App.), 52 How. Pr. 289 ; People ex rel. Cook v. Board of Police, 39 N. Y. *39 506 ; People ex rel. Haines v. Smith, 45 id. 776-777; Swift v. City of Poughkeepsie, 37 id. 516.
Cited 0 timesPublished31 N.Y.S. 627 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1894
BROWN, P. J. The plaintiff was appointed receiver of the property" and effects of Lewis R. Stegman by an order of a judge of the city court of Brooklyn, dated April 15, 1884. … Dubois v. Cassidy, 75 N. Y. 298 ; Campbell v. Genet, 2 Hilt. 290 ; Thorn v. Fellows, 5 Wkly. *629 Dig. 473 ; Hasten v. Amerman, 51 Hun, 244 , 4 N. Y. Supp. 681 ; Columbian Inst, v. Cregan, 11 Civ. Proc. R. 87 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedIn re the Incorporated Village of Garden City
9 Misc. 2d 693 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1956
W. 2d 753 [Tex.]); Long Beach City High School Dist. v. Stewart ( 30 Cal. 2d 763 ); City of Tyler v. Ginn ( 225 S. W. 2d 997 [Tex.]). In the case of Andrews v. … (See Sparkhill Realty Corp. v. State of New York, supra.) In Long Beach City High School Dist. v.
Cited 12 timesPublished135 Misc. 2d 659 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1987
Brown, 123 AD2d 473 ; Matter of Collins v Hammock, 52 NY2d 798 ), we are now inclined to render our decision herein without further delay. … (See, Austin v Board of Higher Educ., 5 NY2d 430, 442 ; 8 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶ 7804.02).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna