Case law

Varick v. Bodine

3 Hill & Den. 444 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1842

(Thomas. v. Cameron, 16 Wend. 579 .) After a regular demand of oyer the declaration is not complete until the oyer has been furnished. … (Rudd v. Long, 4 John. R. 190.) So on a judgment as in case of nonsuit; (Brown v. Lambert, 16 John. R. 148 ;) and for a default in not proceeding to trial pursuant to notice without a sufficient excuse. (How v.

Kingston Associates, Inc. v. LaGuardia

156 Misc. 116 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1935

Hoefle v. … Corkhill v.

Hennessy v. Muhleman

27 Misc. 232 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1899

See Beveridge v. N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co., 112 N. Y. 1 -22, etc., and cases there cited. … Pickering v. Stephenson, 14 L. R. Equity Cas. 322-340; Railway Co. v. Allerton, 18 Wall. 233 ; see Eidman v. Bowman, 58 Ill. 444 ; Finley Shoe & L. Co. v. Kurtz, 34 Mich. 89 .

Monaco v. Raymond

122 Misc. 2d 370 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1984

The Court of Appeals reiterated its position in the subsequent cases of Matter of Memminger v Westbury Union Free School Dist. ( 55 NY2d 867 ) and Matter of Gordon v Board of Educ. ( 54 NY2d 804 ) holding again that letters … (Bishop v Wood, 426 US 341 ; Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564 ; Matter of Petix v Connelie, 47 NY2d 457 .)

In re Ford

35 Misc. 2d 200 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1961

Conklin Confirm Reject 3,500 V. Marks Confirm Reject 5,800 M. Fyffe Confirm Reject 1,100 W. Ryna.ek Confirm Reject 1.250 6, Pettit Reject Reject 2,250 BL. Hillriegel Reject Reject 5,000 H. … Y. 951 ; Matter of Board of Water Supply of City of N. Y., 277 N. Y. 452 .)

Murphy v. Diamond

78 Misc. 2d 309 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1973

(Industrial Group Serv. v. Canton, 24 A D 2d 1032.) … (Hidley v. Rockefeller, 28 N Y 2d 439 and St. Clair v. Yonkers Raceway, 13 N Y 2d 72, cert. den. 375 U. S. 970 .) The petitioner certainly is an aggrieved party as a contractual relationship is averred.

Chase v. City of Glen Cove

34 Misc. 2d 810 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1962

If the Planning Board notice was ambiguous and misleading, adoption of the ordinance would not conform to section 83 of the General City Law and section 11 of the Glen Cove Ordinance (see Brachfeld v. Sforsa, 114 N. Y. … S. 2d 722, and Holly Development v. Board of County Comrs. of Arapahoe County, 140 Col. 95 ).

Ellis v. Broder

11 Misc. 3d 534 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 30, 2006

& Three v Padgett, 185 AD2d 650 [4th Dept 1992]). … Similar statements were made in Ming v Simpkins ( 59 Misc 2d 853 [Sup Ct, Queens County 1968]) and Matter of Teperman v Atcos Baths ( 4 Misc 2d 738 [Sup Ct, Queens County 1956]).

Hook v. Gray

6 Barb. 398 · New York Supreme Court · May 7, 1849

(Parsons v. Thompson, 1 H. Black. 322. Tappan v. Brown, 9 Wend. 175 . Law v. Law, 3 P. Wins. 391.) … Faikney v.

Gordon v. LaClair

48 Misc. 3d 926 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 11, 2015

(See Toney v Owens, 779 F3d 330 [5th Cir 2015]; see also Gunderson v Hvass, 339 F3d 639 [8th Cir 2003].) … The imposition of those conditions are clearly within the discretion of the parole board.” ( 2004 WL 1499457 , *6 n 6, 2004 US Dist LEXIS 11857 , *19 n 6, citing Morrissey v Brewer, 408 US 471 [1972].)

In re the Application for the Investigation of the Expenditures of the Village of Monticello

123 Misc. 556 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1924

board of the village to furnish,” etc. … De John v. Lytle, 116 Misc. Rep. 1 .

McDonough v. Loughlin

20 Barb. 238 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1855

Lowe v. Jolliffe, 1 W. Black. 365. Holt v. Tyrrell, 1 Barnard. Rep. K. B. 12. Bettison v. Bromley, 12 East, 250.) … Brown, S. B. Strong and Rockwell, Justices.]

Monroe Community College v. Hughes

63 Misc. 2d 117 · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 1970

In holding that the privilege of self incrimination can be interposed in an examination before trial in a civil suit, the court in Bradley v. … O’Hare ( 2 AD 2d 436, 440 ) after quoting excerpts from the opinions in Quinn v. United States ( 349 U. S. 155 ); Brown v. United States ( 161 U. S. 591 ) and Ullmann v. United States ( 350 U.

Ripley v. Storer

1 Misc. 2d 281 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1955

Manice v. Powell, 201 N. Y. 194, 200, 201 ; Manson v. Curtis, 223 N. Y. 313 , supra-; McQuade v. Stoneham, 263 N. Y. 323 ; Long Park v. Trenton-New Brunswick Theatres Co., 297 N. … It has been held that a by-law may provide that the directors may not remove the president or chairman of the board (Matter of Buckley, 183 Misc. 189 ).

Sorley v. Lister

33 Misc. 2d 471 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1961

(Blandford v. McClellan, 173 Misc. 15 ; Natelson v. Portfolio, 291 N. Y. 290 .) … (State Road Dept. of Fla. v. Cline, 122 So. 2d 827, 828 [Fla.]; State Road Dept. of Fla. v. Shell, 122 So. 2d 215, 218 [Fla.].)

Strong v. Strong

32 N.Y.S. 349 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1895

BROWN, P. J. The complaint in this action does not state a cause of action for partition of real estate. … Wager v. Wager, 89 N. Y. 161 .

Codwise, Ludlow & Co. v. Hacker

1 Cai. Cas. 74 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1803

Livingston v Rogers, post, 437. See Hun v. Bowne, ante, 23, n. (a). … Hornbeck v. Low, Cole. Cas. 127. But this case is now overruled, and a judge may, in vacation, enlarg* the time for making a case. Black v. Brown 9 Johns. Rep. 264,

Wingate v. Taylor

166 Misc. 13 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1937

This is an application for a peremptory order of mandamus directing the comptroller of the city of New York and the board of estimate and apportionment to include within the provisions of the city budget for the year 1938 … O’Loughlin v. Prendergast, 219 N. Y. 377 ; People ex rel. Cropsey v. Hylan, 199 App. Div. 218 ; affd., 232 N. Y. 601 ; Matter af Bateman v. Mayor *15 of City of Mt. Vernon, 247 id. 250; Matter of Eadie v.

Reilly v. Mayor of New York

10 N.Y.S. 847 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1890

We are unable to see any distinction between the case at bar and the case of Dolan v. Mayor, 6 Hun, 506 . … The attempt to show that the resolution of the board of supervisors, adopted 20th December, 1864, did not create the office of subpoena server to the district attorney, in no manner distinguishes the case at bar from the

Caryl v. Greenwald

21 Misc. 2d 712 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1960

Clearly, plaintiff has no cause of action on any contract theory (Parker v. Simon, 231 N. Y. 503 ; Sieven v. Glazer, 267 App. Div. 969 ; Greene v. Brown, 256 App. Div. 1103 , affd. without opinion 281 N. Y. 742 ). … Absent a breach of contract by. the sellers, the cause of action against the purchasers must fail (Israel v. Wood Dolson, 1 N Y 2d 116).