Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

2,656 results

0.46s

  • America Press, Inc. v. Lewisohn

    74 Misc. 2d 562 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1973

    The testimony does not establish any diversion to public or other use. … for exemption.” *571 This petitioner qualifies as such new entity.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Worth v. Grant

    12 N.Y.S. 879 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1890

    The locality of play-houses, circus pavilions, concert halls, and the like, is clearly a matter of public concern. … The relator contends that, if it exists at all, the discretion is qualified by the requirement of good faith.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Slosson v. Lynch

    43 Barb. 147 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1864

    In none of these cases were the words “next of kin” used without qualifying words. In Brandon v. Brandon the word nearest may be said to have qualified the words “next of kin;” in Smith v. … Young, but he says that the decision did not interfere with his decision, and it clearly did not. In Drake v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • People v. Babbush

    150 Misc. 2d 174 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1991

    Zebersky to work, or that she in fact performed some work in exchange for her salary, are matters of fact which the evidence clearly puts in issue and which are for the jury to resolve. … The court apparently had no doubt, however, that as a matter of statutory interpretation, the Legislature intended that the new procedures in regard to establishing venue be applied to the prosecution of crimes committed

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Warfield v. Watkins

    30 Barb. 395 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1859

    If it had been, clearly there was no legal claim against the plaintiff for any portion of the costs; if it had not been, he was under no obligation to pay the costs while the action was pending. … The last clause of the' agreement does not qualify the defendant’s obligation “ to use due care and diligence in the collection.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Charlton v. Montefiore Hospital

    45 Misc. 2d 153 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1965

    may be *158 drawn that a further fact is established. … , as an expert for the ■ purpose of establishing the geuerally accepted medical practice in the .community.”

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Devito v. Moss

    170 Misc. 170 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1939

    Undoubtedly the commissioner may establish cube ice as one of the standard sizes *174 which all ice dealers are permitted to sell, but that is a different matter from allowing one qualified ice dealer to sell merely one standard … The language quoted does not indicate clearly what standard measurements, if any, it intends to prescribe.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Seymour v. Holcomb

    7 Misc. 3d 530 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 23, 2005

    The City Clerk has a duty to issue marriage licenses to qualified applicants under the general supervision of the DOH. (Domestic Relations Law § 15 [2]; § 23.) … persons of the opposite sex and clearly based on the invidious racial discrimination behind the law.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Koehler v. Koehler

    182 Misc. 2d 436 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1999

    At the onset of the trial, the court allowed the plaintiff to submit such proof as would establish the court’s jurisdiction over the parties and their marriage. … In a similar case involving personal property, it has been held that Banking Law § 675 (b) merely creates a presumption as to the ownership whereas here the proof clearly establishes that the contributions to the account

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. Morin

    91 Misc. 2d 302 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1977

    (H) Section 1983 imposes liability only for deprivations or violations of clearly established Federal constitutional rights of a particular plaintiff. … Pierson addressed the good-faith concept as a "defense” but the later cases have discussed it in terms of a qualified "immunity”.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Zaidi v. United Bank Ltd.

    194 Misc. 2d 1 · New York Supreme Court · May 2, 2002

    Once constitutional malice is proven generally or to defeat a qualified privilege, the plaintiff is entitled to at least nominal compensatory damages only because such proof does not establish the outrage underlying the public … Such unexplainable contradictory statements, by the same person, about the same person, concerning the same period of time, were clearly made with “knowledge that [at least one statement] was false or * * * [with] reckless

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Griswold v. Warner

    3 N.Y.S. 688 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1889

    We think the defendants’ contention is supported by the current of authorities, and clearly so by the decisions of the courts of this state. … A gift of land by will, with an absolute'power to sell and convey the same by the devisee, without any subsequent provision or words to qualify the power to sell, is a gift in fee-simple.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Faculty-Student Ass'n of State University College at Buffalo, Inc. v. Town of Lyndon

    137 Misc. 2d 1057 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1987

    an assessor nor a court may insert qualifying clauses or add conditions not contained in the statute. … A perusal of the forms clearly indicates that they are designed to provide the assessor with sufficient information to determine the eligibility of the applicant for tax-exempt status.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Incorporated Village v. Guardian Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

    87 Misc. 2d 344 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1976

    According to the defendants, the savings clause renders any building which achieved legal nonconforming use status prior to January 1, 1975 immune to the demands of the ordinance. … The Chevron principles establish the propriety of giving nonretroactive effect to the Daly holding as a case of first impression "whose resolution was not clearly foreshadowed.”

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Welling v. Fullen

    164 Misc. 456 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1937

    The court held the appointment illegal because he had not qualified before his appointment but after. … The court held the appointment invalid even though no rules had been established which could be followed in making the appointment. (People ex rel. Chamberlain v. Knox, 45 App. Div. 518 .)

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In re Farley

    73 Misc. 555 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1911

    An eligible list was immediately established as a result of this examination, and therefrom vacancies were filled. … The eligible list now in force was established FTovember' 25, 1910, having upon it 122 names, from which six appointments have been made.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rotundo v. Kennedy

    36 Misc. 2d 332 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1962

    Hitzig, an internist and cardiologist rather than a qualified psychiatrist, disagreed with this and other of Dr. Horowitz’ medical findings. … Kennedy, 9 Misc 2d 49 ). *334 Contrary to respondents’ contention, upon the evidence before me, I find that the competent medical proof clearly establishes that petitioner’s disability, “ a traumatic neurosis of a permanent

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • O'Brien v. People

    48 Barb. 274 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1867

    The evidence of the juror established very clearly that he had read a statement in the newspaper of the homicide, but that, although he had an impression that a homicide was committed, he had none as to the guilt or innocence … The homicide was a brutal murder, without any qualifying circumstances, and no injustice has been done by the conviction. The judgment should be affirmed. Leonard, Ingraham and Clerke, Justices,]

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Town of Canton

    4 Lans. 409 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1871

    It clearly appears from this statute, that the certificate in question supersedes the certificate of the board of town auditors, which they are required to make in regard to claims allowed by them, “ specifying the name of … The defendant was cognizant of all the facts, and can claim no immunity from want of notice.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Empire Gen Holdings, Inc. v. Governor of New York

    40 Misc. 3d 984 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 25, 2013

    Tax Law § 21 (a) (3) establishes such credit and provides, in pertinent part, that it is “allowed for the taxable year in which such qualified tangible property is placed in service on a qualified site with respect to which … The parties agree that the facility constitutes “qualified tangible property” and that the South 40 is a “qualified site,” which received a “certificate of completion.” (Id.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.