Case law

Moody v. Board of Supervisors

46 Barb. 659 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1866

In Meeker v. … (State v. Bertheol, 6 Blackf. 474 . State v. Doon, R. M. Charlton, 1. State v. Haines, 30 Maine R. 65.)

Connell v. Town Board

126 Misc. 2d 474 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1984

In Matter of Badura v Guelli ( 94 AD2d 972, 973 ) the court stated “Since the Town Board of Walworth failed to prepare an [Environmental Impact Statement], Special Term correctly remitted the matter for further proceedings … Council v Town of Oyster Bay ( 88 AD2d 484, 491 ), the court said “the town board’s failure to make the necessary ‘explicit’ SEQRA findings in rezoning the property was fatal.”

Beebe v. Board of Sup'rs

19 N.Y.S. 629 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1892

Osterhoudt v. Rigney, 98 N. Y. 222, 230, 231 . At the time of his employment, the defendant Anderson was a member of the board of supervisors. … Jewett v. Miller, 10 N. Y. 402 ; New York Cent. Ins. Co. v. National P. Ins. Co., 14 N. Y. 83 ; Conkey v. Bond, 36 N. Y. 427 ; Murray v. Beard, 102 N. Y. 505 , 7 N. E. Rep. 553.

Boyce v. Board of Supervisors

20 Barb. 294 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1855

In The People v. … In The People v.

Maltz v. Board of Education

32 Misc. 2d 492 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1952

Alfred V. Norton, J. … (McEvoy v. City of New York, 266 App.

Stanley v. Board of Appeals

168 Misc. 797 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1938

(Meridian National Bank v. Hoyt & Bros. Co., 74 Miss. 221 ; 21 So. 12 .) … Hunzicker v. Pulliam, 168 Okla. 632 ; 37 P. [2d] 417 .)

McCarthy v. Board of Education

106 Misc. 193 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1919

Peixotto v. Board of Education, 160 App. Div. 554 ; affd., 212 N. Y. 463 , and Peofle ex rel. Board of Education v. Finley, 211 id. 51. … within the jurisdiction of such body or board.

Board of Supervisors v. Bowen

4 Lans. 24 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1871

When this board is sued, as a board, the county is sued; and when the board brings an action, it is the action of the county. In substance and legal effect, the board of supervisors is the corporation. … (Stewart v. Ahrenfeldt, 4 Denio, 189 ; Russell v. Cook, 3 Hill, 504 .) The strictness to which courts will hold parties to the settlement of actions between them is illustrated in the case of Shank v. Shoemaker ( 18 N.

Brown v. New York

22 Misc. 3d 893 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 2, 2008

Plaintiff in this negligence action, Anastasia Joliet Renee Brown, is a minor represented by her adoptive mother Myrtle Brown. … (See Van Emrik v Chemung, 220 AD2d at 953 .)

Jones v. Town Board

35 Misc. 2d 688 · New York Supreme Court · May 3, 1962

Div. 260 ; Matter of Teeple v. McKeon, 273 App. Div. 936 ; Matter of Ahern v. Board of Supervisors, 7 A D 2d 538, affd. 6 N Y 2d 376; Matter of Macy v. Clayton, 100 N. Y. S. 2d 890, affd. 277 App. … In Matter of Teeple v.

Bayer v. Board of Education

58 Misc. 2d 259 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1968

Act, § 228, subd. 6 [now CPLR 311, subd. 7]), the action must be dismissed (Bayer v. … Judicial Council, 1944, p. 265; see Sandak v. Tuxedo Union School Dist. No. 3, 308 N. Y. 226, 232 ; Teresta v. City of New York, 304 N. Y. 440, 443 ).

Board of Supervisors v. Pindar

3 Lans. 8 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1870

The board of supervisors is a body of men organized for certain purposes provided by law. … I think it was not essential to allege that the bond was forfeited, to the knowledge of the board of supervisors, or that the board had been required by the comptroller to put the bond in suit.

Brown v. New York State Tax Commission

199 Misc. 349 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1950

(Woollard v. Schaffer Stores Co., 272 N. Y. 304 ; Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New York, 276 N. Y. 198 , supra; Richfield Oil Corp. v. City of Syracuse, 287 N. Y. 234 .) … (Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New York, 276 N. Y. 198 .)” The case of Woollard v. Schaffer Stores Co. ( 272 N.

Klein v. Conciliation & Appeals Board

64 Misc. 2d 329 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1970

In this CPLR article 78 proceeding three tenant petitioners seek review of three opinions of respondent Conciliation and Appeals Board (CAB) concerning the right of their respective landlords unilaterally to extend two-year … The fact that HDA has approved the code and taken no action with respect to the CAB opinions with which it disagrees is immaterial (Berfond v. Hoffman, 61 Misc 2d 330 ; Hammond v. Cohen Bros. Realty & Constr. Corp., N.

Board of Education v. Areman

80 Misc. 2d 659 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1975

(CPLR 2001; Covino v. Alside Aluminum Supply Co., 42 A D 2d 77, 80.) … (See Garber v. Central School Dist. No. 1, 251 App. Div. 214, 219 .) Neither the court nor an arbitrator can require the board to surrender that power. Accordingly, the dispute between the parties is not arbitrable.

Lewis v. Board of Education

157 Misc. 520 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1935

Thus in Gunnison v. Board of Education ( 176 N. … (Board of Education v. Minor, 23 Ohio St. 211 ; State ex rel. Weiss v. District Board, 76 Wis. 177 ; 44 N. W. 967 ; People ex rel. Ring v. Board of Education, 245 111. 334; 92 N. E. 251 ; Herold v.

Mulgrew v. Board of Education

31 Misc. 3d 296 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 10, 2011

(See Matter of Anonymous v Board of Educ. for Mexico Cent. School Dist., 162 Misc 2d 300 [Sup Ct, Oswego County 1994]; Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562 [1986].) … (Ma tter of LaRocca v Board of Educ. of Jericho Union Free School Dist., 220 AD2d 424, 427 [2d Dept 1995] [citation omitted]; see also Matter of Washington Post Co. v New York State Ins.

Nestler v. Board of Examiners

192 Misc. 663 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1948

While the Court of Appeals in Matter of Sloat v. Board of Examiners ( 274 N. … Accordingly, this court will follow the procedure outlined in Matter of Epstein v. Board of Education of City of N.

Chmela v. Board of Education

26 Misc. 2d 10 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1960

It is not. unlike the situation in Maurer v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. ( 294 N. … (May v. Board of Educ., 269 App. Div. 959 , affd. 295 N. Y. 948 ; Sanchick v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 11 Misc 2d 876 ; Ginsberg v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 272 App. Div. 774 ; Wilber v.

Hardecker v. Board of Education

180 Misc. 1008 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1943

The plainly expressed intention is that in a “ special case ” the Board of Education, with the approval of the Board of Estimate, may authorize the employment of private architects. … In fact, much weight should be given to their interpretation and where, as here, the Board of Education and the Board of Estimate have determined that the situation is one which presents a “ special case ”, the court is constrained