Case law

People ex rel. Dempsey v. Wells

38 Misc. 573 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1902

Sun Oil Co. v. Waldinger

14 Misc. 2d 852 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1958

(Matter of Boardwalk & Seashore Corp. v. Murdock, 286 N. Y. 494 ; Matter of Von der Heide v. Zoning *854 Board of Appeals of Town of Somers, 282 App. Div. 1076 .) … Petitioners seek to bring themselves within the rule of Matter of Dubow v. Ross ( 254 App.

Brower v. New York City Department of Education

38 Misc. 3d 291 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 9, 2012

(CPLR 7803 [3]; Goodwin v Perales, 88 NY2d 383, 392 [1996]; Matter of Purdy v Kreisberg, 47 NY2d 354, 358 [1979]; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. … (Kahn v New York City Dept. of Educ., 18 NY3d at 472 ; Matter of Frasier v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 71 NY2d 763, 765, 767-768 [1988]; see Kahn v New York City Dept. of Educ., 18 NY3d at 464, 468

People ex rel. West Shore Railroad v. Adams

10 N.Y.S. 295 · New York Supreme Court · May 2, 1890

In People v. Davenport, 91 N. … In People v. Carter, 109 N. Y. 582 , 17 N. E.

Freeman v. Brooks

29 Misc. 719 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1899

The plaintiff seeks to restrain the payment by the water board of the sum above mentioned upon the two grounds: First That said water board had no right to employ spécial counsel, but should have relied upon the city attorney … If either the defendant water board or said attorneys desire it, a reference shall be had herein to proceed upon eight days’ notice. Ordered accordingly.

Town of Tonawanda v. Stapell, Mumm & Beals Corp.

147 Misc. 768 · New York Supreme Court · May 29, 1933

(City of New York v. Continental Asphalt Co., 163 App. Div. 486 ; affd., 218 N. Y. 685 ; City of Hutchinson v. Kansas Bitulithic Co., 239 Fed. 659 ; Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. … App. 503 ; Schropp v. Zielda Forsee Investment Co., [Mo.] 224 S. W. 424 .) These views make it unnecessary for the referee to discuss certain other questions raised.

Hanks v. Urstadt

74 Misc. 2d 536 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1970

Town Bd. of Town of Fishkill, 18 N Y 2d 870; Matter of Paliotto v. Cohalan, 8 N Y 2d 1065; Matter of Neddo v. Schrade, 270 N. Y. 97, 102-103 ; People ex rel. Trustees v. Board of Supervisors, 131 N. … As stated in Goldberg v. Kelly ( 397 U.

People ex rel. Djurovic v. Djurovic

205 Misc. 216 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1954

Pending attempts to settle their dispute, the parties placed their two children in a boarding school. … (Schneiderman v. United States, 320 U. S. 118, 122 .) The court will jealously guard this treasured birthright of the child. In People ex rel. Choolokian v. Mission of Immaculate Virgin ( 192 Misc. 454 , affd. 274 App.

Harris v. Hardy

3 Hill & Den. 393 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1842

Pr. 230 ; and see Evans v. Evans, 1 Ves. Jr. 96 ; Shafioe v. Shaftoe, 7 id. 171.) … (Atkinson v. Leonard, 3 Brown’s Ch. Rep. 218 ; Howden v. Rogers, 1 Ves. § Bea. 133.)

Keith v. Maple Grove Cemetery Ass'n

208 Misc. 217 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1955

(See Reese v. Pinelawn Cemetery, 243 App. Div. 165 , and Jackson v. Elmont Cemetery, 275 App. Div. 544 , 548-549.) … Assn. v. Blaisdell, 290 U. S, 398, 435).

Schneider v. National City Bank

180 Misc. 426 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1943

Such distinction has hitherto been made, but the-decision in the case of Brown v. McCain ( 263 App. … (Rogers Locomotive Works v. Kelley, 88 N. Y. 234 .) There is no fundamental difference between the case at bar and Brown v. McCain (supra).

Snyder v. Andrews

6 Barb. 43 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1849

The reading of the letter in question, by the defendant, in the presence of Brown, was a sufficient publication to sustain this action. Second. … By this remark the court no doubt intended to say, that if the jury believed the defendant read the letter to Brown, that would be a publication.

10 Lafayette Square Holdings v. City of Buffalo

108 Misc. 2d 960 · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 1981

(Hurd v City of Buffalo, supra; Bethlehem Steel Corp. v Board of Educ., 61 AD2d 147 , mod and affd 44 NY2d 831 ; Pellnat v Buffalo, 80 Misc 2d 849 , affd 59 AD2d 1038 .) … Matter of Great Eastern Mall v Condon, 36 NY2d 544 ; Matter of City of Little Falls v Board of Assessors of Town of Salisbury, 68 AD2d 734, 741 .)

People v. Cutting

3 Johns. 1 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1808

(The Queen v. Mason, 2 Salk. 447. 3 Black. Com. 260. Buller’s N. P. *7 215. Vaugh. 64.) … (The People v.

Murphy v. Stirling

66 Misc. 2d 105 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1971

Section 5-501 of the General Obligations Law provides that the interest shall be as prescribed by the Banking Board. … Y. 317 ; Bombas v. Fisher, 180 N. Y. S. 449).

Fox v. Jackson

8 Barb. 355 · New York Supreme Court · May 6, 1850

(Brown v. Howard, 14 John. 119 . Bates v. Conkling, 10 Wend. 392 .) I am clearly of the opinion that there was some evidence against Fox. … (Adams v. Freeman, 9 John. 118 . 1 Cowen’s Tr. 409. Collins v. Ferris, 14 John. 247 .)

Evanns v. Gunn

177 Misc. 85 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1940

On the petition of a number of residents residing on Colonial parkway and adjoining plaintiffs' property, the town board amended the original zoning map six months later, as aforesaid.' … Louis Railway v. Walters, 294 U. S. 405, 415 .) Chief Justice Hughes in Abie State Bank v. Bryan ( 282 U.

Gilbert v. Quinlan

13 N.Y.S. 671 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1891

[referring to a conversation had between the plaintiff and the defendant in regard to the change of rates made by the board of trade:] “Nothing, except that ! told Mr. … The cases cited upon the part of the appellant,—namely, Briggs v. Rowe, * 43 N. Y. 426 ;. Briggs v. Boyd, 56 N. Y. 291 ; Sibbald v. Iron Co., 83 N. Y. 378 ; and Wylie v. Bank, 61 N.

Walsh v. McElligott

169 Misc. 457 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1938

(Dissenting opinion of Hubbs, J., Matter of Sheridan v. McElligott, 278 N. Y. 59, 63, 64 , and the cases there cited.) … (Matter of Sheridan v. McElligott, supra, 63 .) The application in this case comes within the second of the foregoing rules.

People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Gourley

64 Misc. 605 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1909

New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company v. Keno, 61 Misc. … franchise “ as so fixed ” by the State board shall be entered by the assessors or other officers in the proper column of the assessment-roll, .etc., and again provides that “ the valuation so fixed by the State board shall