Case law

Petrazzolo v. Board of Examiners of the Board of Education

5 Misc. 2d 124 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1956

The petitioner was one of those whose name was stricken from the eligible list. *126 On appeal to the Appellate Division of the Third Department (Matter of Abramson v. … Even if petitioner was certified and appointed before the error was discovered, the board of examiners had the authority to revoke such certification and appointment (Matter of Romanchuk v. Murphy, 200 Misc. 987 ).

Lawson v. Board of Education

62 Misc. 2d 281 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1970

Although the Court of Appeals has passed upon the constitutionality of the Taylor Law (Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. v. Shanker, 54 Misc 2d 941 , affd. 29 A D 2d 634 [1st Dept., 1968]; City of New York v. … Justice Hoyt has taken a similar position in Matter of Zeluck v. Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of New Rochelle ( 62 Misc 2d 274 ) in a decision dated January 6, 1970.

Brown v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.

24 Abb. N. Cas. 160 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1890

Mason v. Ring, 1 Robt. 650. … Compare Mackall v. Richards, 116 U. S. 45 . 16. Bowman v. Bowe, 40 Hun, 489 .

Pisicchio v. Board of Appeals

165 Misc. 156 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1937

A hearing was held by the board of appeals, during which many witnesses testified. A carefully-prepared and illuminating opinion was filed by each group of appeal board members in support of the respective decisions. … In Yuba City v. Cherniavsky ( 117 Cal.

Quillen v. Board of Education

203 Misc. 320 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1952

On the trial of this negligence action, the defendant board of education admitted liability. The question of damages only was submitted to the jury. … Smith 349, 351; Matthews v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp., 245 App. Div. 731 ; Irwin v. Klein, 243 App. Div. 23 ; Sheehan v. Coffey, 201 App. Div. 87 ). That is not the present situation.

Craig v. Board of Education

173 Misc. 969 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1940

(Welker v. Lathrop, 210 N. Y. 434 ; People ex rel. Board of Education of the City of New York v. Finley, 211 N. Y. 51 ; People ex rel. Peixotto v. Board of Education of the City of New York, 212 N. Y. 463 .) … There is nothing in Matter of Scahill v. Drzewucki ( 269 N. Y. 343 ); Palmer v. Board of Education (276 id. 222), and Matter of Andresen v. Rice (277 id. 271) to the contrary.

People ex rel. Brown v. Kennedy

102 Misc. 450 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1918

As was said by Judge Hiscock in Dahlstrom v. Gemunder, 198 N. … Rochkind v. Perlman, 123 App. Div. 808 . This is not a proper case therefore for an alternative writ.

Board of Education v. Shanker

54 Misc. 2d 941 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1967

The constitutionality of this statute has consistently been upheld by our courts, and the most recent pronouncement thereon can be found in City of New York v. Social Serv. … The court has also considered the position of the board and the Union to refuse or agree to submit to mediation procedures.

Eadie v. Town Board

9 Misc. 3d 599 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 25, 2005

Respondents Town Board of the Town of North Greenbush, Planning Board of the Town of North Greenbush (North Green-bush), John Gallogly and Thomas Gallogly move and cross-move to strike materials and claims from the petitioners … of Northeastern N.Y., 216 AD2d 773, 775 [1995]; Matter of Crawmer v Mills, 239 AD2d 844, 845 [1997]; Ritt v Lenox Hill Hosp., 182 AD2d 560, 562 [1992]).

Moody v. Board of Supervisors

46 Barb. 659 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1866

In Meeker v. … (State v. Bertheol, 6 Blackf. 474 . State v. Doon, R. M. Charlton, 1. State v. Haines, 30 Maine R. 65.)

Messeck v. Board of Supervisors

50 Barb. 190 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 4, 1867

(Heywood v. The City of Buffalo, 14 N. Y. Rep. 534 . The Mayor of Brooklyn v. Meserole, 26 Wend. 132 . The Susquehanna Bank v. The Board of Supervisors of Broome County, 25 N. Y. Rep. 312 . Wiggin v. The Mayor of N. … Livingston v. Hollenbeck, 4 Barb. 10 . Blake v. The City of Brooklyn, 26 id. 301. The Penn. Coal Co. v. D. and H. C. Co., 31 N. Y. Rep. 91 . M. B. Ins. Co. v. Board of Supervisors of N. Y. 20 How. 417 .)

High v. Board of Education

169 Misc. 98 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 22, 1938

(See, also, Cooke v. Dodge, 164 Misc. 78 .) … (Matter of Becker v. Eisner, 277 N. Y. 143, 148 .)

Beebe v. Board of Sup'rs

19 N.Y.S. 629 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1892

Osterhoudt v. Rigney, 98 N. Y. 222, 230, 231 . At the time of his employment, the defendant Anderson was a member of the board of supervisors. … Jewett v. Miller, 10 N. Y. 402 ; New York Cent. Ins. Co. v. National P. Ins. Co., 14 N. Y. 83 ; Conkey v. Bond, 36 N. Y. 427 ; Murray v. Beard, 102 N. Y. 505 , 7 N. E. Rep. 553.

Boyce v. Board of Supervisors

20 Barb. 294 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1855

In The People v. … In The People v.

Lederman v. Board of Education

196 Misc. 873 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1949

V, § 6). … (See Matter of Nestler v. Board of Examiners, 192 Misc. 663 .)

People ex rel. Jenny v. Brown

83 Misc. 495 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1914

Y. 547 ; Marks v. Emigrant Industrial Sav. Bank, 122 App. Div. 661 -664; Williams v. Post, 158 id. 818.

McClure v. Board of Supervisors

50 Barb. 594 · New York Supreme Court · May 6, 1867

In the cases where the board are empowered and directed to audit and allow the claim or demand, no suit can be prosecuted against the county for non-payment, neither before nor after the audit and allowance. (Brady v. … (Howell v. The City of Buffalo, 15 N. Y. Rep. 512 . Tonnele v. Hall, 4 Comst. 140. People v. Utica Ins. Co., 15 John. 358, 380 .) The case.of Hart v.

Board of Supervisors v. Budlong

51 Barb. 493 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1868

assuming that the defendant could have proved what he offered, it appears that the defendant’s wife, prior to April 1, 1860, without cause and Without consent on his part, and against his remonstrance, deserted his bed and board … A husband who is ready, able and willing to support his wife, who gives her no just cause or occasion to abandon him or leave his bed and board, cannot be compelled to support her elsewhere than at his own house and home

Brown v. Empire City Savings Bank

23 Misc. 2d 1094 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1960

in order to protect himself against payment by the debtor to the original creditor, is to inform the debtor of the assignment, and the burden of proof of the giving of such notice is upon the claimed assignee (Heermans v. … he had otherwise disposed of the passbook, the time elapsed is more than sufficient for the giving of any notice to the debtor, and in the circumstances here the order of the court is sufficient protection to it (Myers v.

Zeluck v. Board of Education

62 Misc. 2d 274 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1970

Petitioners’ claim to denial of equal protection because of disparate treatment between public and private employers has been passed upon and rejected (Rankin v. Shanker, 23 N Y 2d 111; City of New York v. … De Lury, supra; Matter of Di Maggio v. Brown, 19 N Y 2d 283; Pruzen v. *275 Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 9 N Y 2d 911).