Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.26s
East Side Credit Union v. Leiman
129 Misc. 239 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1927
These considerations distinguish the .case clearly from Pratt v. Short ( 79 N. Y. 437 ), as explained in Washington Life Ins. Co. v. Clason ( 16 App. … Co. v. Clason, supra, 436; U. S. Title Guaranty Co. v. Brown, 166 App. Div. 688 ; affd., 217 N. Y. 628 .
Cited 5 timesPublished18 Barb. 484 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1854
By the Court, Brown, P. J. … Brown, Dean and Rockwell, Justices.]
Cited 11 timesPublished75 Misc. 2d 379 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1973
Board of Elections of City of N. Y., 262 N. Y. 416 ). … Div. 419, 442 , supra; Matter of Lauer v. Board of Elections of City of N. Y., supra, p. 420; Matter of Kress v. Board of Elections of County of Niagara, 67 Misc 2d 121 ).
Cited 1 timesPublished25 Misc. 2d 560 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1960
(See, also, Matter of Andresen v. Rice, 277 N. Y. 271, 282 [1938].) *562 The Fmk ease was followed by Matter of Sloat v. Board of Examiners ( 274 N. … A rereading of the portion of the Court of Appeals opinion (Matter of Sloat v. Board of Examiners, 274 N.
Cited 4 timesPublished26 Misc. 2d 1026 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1961
McKinney, was at all the times set forth in the petition chairman of the board of directors of the Organization. … V, *1034 VII.) These cards clearly indicate the following: “Membership card not valid unless signed by Treasurer.”
Cited 1 timesPublished145 Misc. 2d 620 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 18, 1989
As required under the General Regulations of the Banking Board (3 NYCRR part 86 et seq.) East New York approved an initial version of the plan of conversion on July 1, 1987, by a vote of its board of trustees. … A proxy statement need not contain "speculative financial predictions” (Rodman v Grant Found., 608 F2d 64, 72 [2d Cir 1979]), nor need it "characterize disclosed information” (Mendell v Greenberg, 612 F Supp 1543, 1550 [SD
Cited 6 timesPublished132 Misc. 2d 568 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1986
(People v Towles, 110 AD2d 729 [2d Dept 1985]; People v Sirianni, 89 AD2d 775 [4th Dept 1982].) … The Board of Immigration Appeals may, in its discretion, consider that certificate as it would a certificate issued by the court.
Cited 5 timesPublished10 N.Y.S. 148 · New York Supreme Court · May 26, 1890
as the board may deem to be benefited thereby, or may at any time enjoy the use thereof, and in proportion to such benefit, as the same shall be determined by said board of trustees.” … In Pink v. Barberi, 17 Wkly.
Cited 0 timesPublished126 Misc. 2d 908 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1984
(See, Breard v Alexandria, 341 US 622, 632-633 [1951]; Bryant Westchester Realty Corp. v Board of Health, 91 Misc 2d 56, 59 [Sup Ct, NY County 1977].) … There is nothing to suggest that the amendments are without sound basis in reason or adopted without due regard for the facts. 9See, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., supra.)
Cited 11 timesPublishedCromwell v. Brooklyn Fire Insurance
39 Barb. 227 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1863
In Carter v. … Brown, J. concurred. Lott, J. dissented. New trial granted.
Cited 2 timesPublished29 Misc. 2d 17 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1961
Paraphrasing the language of the Court of Appeals in Warner v. Press Pub. Co. ( 132 N. … Act, §§ 349-354; People v. Shapiro, 308 N. Y. 453 ).” (People v. Keating, 286 App. Div. 150, 152 .)
Cited 7 timesPublishedIn re Thirty-Fourth Street Railroad
2 How. Pr. 369 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1885
of railroad commissioners in cases where the companies interested shall unite in a request for such board to act. … Brown ( 26 N. Y., 467 ) is to the same effect. So much of the enactment as is contained in section 14 of chapter 252 of the Laws of 1884 is clearly an appropriate exercise of legislative power.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFieldston Garden Apartments, Inc. v. City of New York
7 Misc. 2d 147 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1955
Town of Marblehead, 316 Mass., 124 ; Bishop v. Board of Zoning Appeals of New Haven, 133 Conn., 614 ; Marshall v. Salt Lake City, 141 P., 2d, 704, Utah; *153 Bartman v. … S. 104, 575 .) ” In the Matter of Kilgus v. Board of Estimate of City of N. Y. ( 308 N.
Cited 3 timesPublishedFaculty-Student Ass'n of Harpur College, Inc. v. Dawson
57 Misc. 2d 112 · New York Supreme Court · May 11, 1967
(People v. Ryan, 274 N. … Mizpah Lodge v. Burke, 228 N.
Cited 2 timesPublished41 Misc. 2d 889 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1964
The court, therefore, rejects defendants’ contention that the Planning Board’s recommendation of disapproval renders the issue moot. … (Merritt v. Village of Portchester, 71 N. Y. 309, 312 ; see, also, Village of Williston Park v. Israel, 191 Misc. 6 , affd. 276 App. Div. 968 , affd. 301 N. Y. 713 ; Brachfeld v. Sforza, 114 N. Y. S. 2d 722, 725.)
Cited 3 timesPublishedHogan v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
136 N.Y.S. 1047 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1912
not so large as those of later construction, including the one he was attempting to board. … Co. v. Dailey, 179 Fed. 289 , 102 C. C. A. 660 , reversing (C.
Cited 1 timesPublishedLiberty Meadows, LLC v. Incorporated Village of Jefferson
24 Misc. 3d 1160 · New York Supreme Court · May 13, 2009
(Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851 [1985]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980].) … In Matter of Woodhull Assoc. v Board of Trustees of Inc.
Cited 0 timesPublished4 N.Y.S. 742 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1889
Beal v. Finch, 11 N. Y. 128 ; O’Shea v. Kirker, 4 Bosw. 120 , 8 Abb. Pr. 68 ; Hoffman v. Schwartz, 11 Civ. Proc. R. 200 . … Juror Brown then spoke, and said the damages were $75, but they (the jury) intended that each defendant should pay $25 of it.”
Cited 4 timesPublished167 Misc. 2d 61 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1995
The law recognizes that the chain of causation leading from an illegal arrest to a subsequent custodial statement may become so attenuated as to remove the taint of the initial illegality (see, e.g., Brown v Illinois, 422 … ]). *71 Moreover, although unsupported by probable cause, the arrests here were not calculated to cause "surprise, fright and confusion” (Brown v Illinois, supra, at 605 ), nor were they knowing or intentional attempts to
Cited 3 timesPublishedHartford Insurance Group v. Town of North Hempstead
127 Misc. 2d 72 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1984
(De Forte v Allstate Ins. Co., 66 AD2d 1028 ; Goldstein v Brogan Cadillac Oldsmobile Corp., 90 AD2d 512, 514 .) … Plaintiff has alerted the court to no provision authorizing the town board to delegate that power.
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna