Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

2.22s

  • Cugell v. Monaghan

    201 Misc. 607 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1951

    In Baker v. Board of Educ. of City of New York (62 N. Y. … Matter of Mitchell v. Board of Education of the City of New Rochelle, 252 App. Div. 873 , 300 N. Y. S. 285.

    Superseded — as noted by a later courtCited 17 timesPublished
  • Rhodes v. Newhall

    12 N.Y.S. 669 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1891

    Moore & Co.” to receive on board their propeller Robert R. … Lishman v. Christie, 19 Q. B. Div. 333. The manner in which the case comes up materially simplifies the question. The action is solely one for the recovery of freight charges according to the written agreement.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Saunders v. N. Y. Central Railroad

    30 Abb. N. Cas. 88 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1893

    The case of Buccleuch v. Metropolitan Board of Works (L. R. 5 H. L. 418) was this. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Townsey

    5 Denio 70 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1847

    (Butler v. Palmer, 1 Hill, 324 , 331.) … And see Yeaton, v. The United States, ( 6 Cranch, 281, 283 ;) The Schooner Rachel v. The Same. (6 id. 329 ;) The United Slates v. Passmore, (4 Doll. 372;) Lewis v. Foster, ( N. Hamp. 61;) Palmer v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Maickel v. Lundy

    4 Misc. 2d 98 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1953

    A rule inconsistent Avith a statute is invalid (Nelson v. Board of Higher Educ. of City of N. Y., 263 App. Div. 144 , affd. 288 N. Y. 649 ). … in the first instance (Reis v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Vizzini

    78 Misc. 2d 1040 · New York Supreme Court · May 28, 1974

    (See United States v. Enmons, 410 U. S. 396 .) … (United States v. De Laurentis, supra, p. 214.)

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Lewis v. Murray

    10 Misc. 2d 1009 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1958

    Board of Elections ( 207 Misc. 12 ) the objections of the respondents must be overruled. … (Matter of Florke v. Meisser, 289 N. Y. 627; Matter of McKeever v. Hornidge, 205 Misc. 362 , affd. 283 App. Div. 805 , affd. 306 N. Y. 876 .) Submit order.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Rosenthal v. Weinfeld

    175 Misc. 9 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 6, 1940

    Steckler v. Warden ( 259 N. … I am inclined to agree with the view expressed by Justice Schmuck in Matter of Gross v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marsh v. Russell

    2 Lans. 340 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1870

    (See Wilbur v. How, 8 Johns., 444 ; Doolin v. Ward, 6 Johns., 194 ; Swan v. Chropenning, 20 Cal., 182 ; Gardner v. Morse, 25 Maine, 140; Gulick v. Ward , 5 Halst., 87.) … (See Brown v. Brown, 34 Barb., 533 ; Da Beerski v. Paige, 47 Barb., 173 ; 36 N. Y., 537 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Electric Power Co. v. Mayor of New York

    29 Misc. 48 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1899

    Co. v. Hess, 125 N. Y. 641 . … See Scott v. Mayor, 27 App. Div. 240 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Pine

    2 Barb. 566 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1848

    Townsend v. The State, 2 Blackf. 156. Cowen & Hill’s Notes, 1501. United States v. Wilson and Porter, 1 Bald. Rep. 78.) … Scene at Brown’s last September. It was of short duration, and occurred after he had been drinking. 5. Application to Isaac Lawton for a warrant. He had been drinking, and seems to have had an idea that Mrs.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Benedict v. Roberts

    30 Misc. 2d 650 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1961

    The Town Board of the Town of Baton consented to the order. … Bushnell v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Arndt v. Altman

    181 Misc. 887 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1943

    (Youssoupoff v. Widener, *889 246 N. Y. 174 ; Brown v. Robinson, 224 N. Y. 301 ; Robinson v. Miller, 210 App. Div. 450 ; People v. Sacks, 276 N. Y. 321 ; Balboa Realty Co. v. Brenglass Realty Corp., 147 Misc. 602 .) … (Gilbert v. Rothschild, 280 N. Y. 66 ; Yonkers Fur Dressing Co. v. Royal Ins. Co., 247 N. Y. 435 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Richardson v. City of Brooklyn

    34 Barb. 569 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1861

    (Richardson v. City of Brooklyn, 31 Barb. 152 .) … Emott, Brown and Scrug hham, Justices.]

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Kent v. Village of North Tarrytown

    26 Misc. 86 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1899

    Whenever such board in any incorporated village shall deem the sewers insufficient to protect the public health, it shall certify the fact to the board of trustees, with its recommendations of additions and alterations, and … As was said of the Civil Service Law in the case of Kip v. City of Buffalo, 123 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Smith

    32 N.Y.S. 317 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1895

    Board of Health v. Heister, supra. … Rapello, J., in People v. Keeler, 99 N. Y. 479 , 2 N. E. 615 ; Happy v. Mosher, 48 N. Y. 313 ; People v. Supervisors of Essex Co., 70 N. Y. 228 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Uribe

    113 Misc. 2d 207 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1982

    During defendant’s presence in the room, the clear plastic bags were removed from the brown bag and placed on a table near defendant. … (See People v Daniels, 37 NY2d 624 ; People v Lopez, 59 AD2d 767 ; People v Caban, 90 Misc 2d 43 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Morrisey v. Boland

    35 Misc. 117 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1901

    Gaffigan v. Rickerson, 56 App. … Baird v. Nixon, 32 App. Div; 513; People ex rel. Green v. Van Wyck, 159 N. Y. 509 . Judgment for the defendant, dismissing the complaint, with costs. Complaint dismissed, with costs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Mayor New York

    18 N.Y.S. 536 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1892

    board, said board may direct the counsel to the corporation to take legal proceedings to acquire the same for said city, etc. … As it was stated in Kingsland v. Mayor, etc., 110 N. Y. 578 , 18 N. E.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McGoey v. Black

    123 Misc. 2d 508 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1984

    Therefore, he concludes, the Board should have accepted the petition as presumptively valid (Matter of Reich v Bosco, 21 Misc 2d 973 , affd 9 AD2d 919 ), and his name and the names of the others should be placed on the ballot … (Matter of Hutson v Bass, 54 NY2d 772 ; Matter of Alamo v Black, 51 NY2d 716 ; Matter of Higby v Mahoney, 48 NY2d 15 .) It would seem that this result has been tolerated without comment many times in the past.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.