Case law

In re Kerwin

14 N.Y.S. 353 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1891

, and clothing; that by so doing she is es-topped to controvert the same, or to claim or make any charge whatever in any form for such care, board, or clothes as she alleges that she has furnished. … Riggs v. Cragg, 89 N. Y. 479 . See, also, Hyland v. Baxter, 98 N. Y. 610 .

Peck v. Belknap

8 N.Y.S. 265 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1889

In the case of Ayers v. Lawrence, 59 N. … It was held in the ease of Hull v Ely, 2 Abb. N.

In re Higbee

153 Misc. 1 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 8, 1934

On August 21, 1934, there was presented to and filed with the board of elections of the county of Onondaga, N. … Matter of Burke v. Terry, 203 N. Y. 293 .)

Brower v. New York City Department of Education

38 Misc. 3d 291 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 9, 2012

(CPLR 7803 [3]; Goodwin v Perales, 88 NY2d 383, 392 [1996]; Matter of Purdy v Kreisberg, 47 NY2d 354, 358 [1979]; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. … (Kahn v New York City Dept. of Educ., 18 NY3d at 472 ; Matter of Frasier v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 71 NY2d 763, 765, 767-768 [1988]; see Kahn v New York City Dept. of Educ., 18 NY3d at 464, 468

Elwell v. Dodge

33 Barb. 336 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1861

(Howland v. Myer, 3 Comst. 290. Gillett v. Campbell, 1 Denio, 520 . Bank of Vergennes v. Warren, 7 Hill, 91 .) … (Curtis v. Leavitt, supra. Eno v. Crooke, 6 Selden, 60.)

Skolny v. Hillman

114 Misc. 571 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1921

; that the various local unions in the city of New York elect and select representatives upon said board in said city and that said board has, subject to the review and control by the general executive board of the Amalgamated … Boyd v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co., 187 N. Y. 262 ; Johnson v. Phoenix Bridge Co., 197 id. 316 ; Helling v. Boss, 121 *577 N. Y. Supp. 1013 .

Lee Crossley & Associates, Inc. v. Batlle

167 Misc. 2d 183 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1995

Petitioner appealed the HLPC’s decision to the Village Board of Trustees (hereinafter the Trustees) who denied the appeal, which denial petitioner appealed. … Co. v Village of Tarrytown, 209 AD2d 57 ; Chira v Global Med. Review, 160 Misc 2d 368 .) Although Federal Deposit Ins.

Western New York Water Co. v. Whitehead

97 Misc. 57 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1916

(Holy Trinity Church v. United States, 143 U. S. 457 ; Murray v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 4 Keyes, 274 ; People ex rel. Wood v. Lacombe, 99 N. Y. 43 ; Murray v. Gibson, 15 How. [U. S.] 421; State ex rel. Heiden v. … Wood v. Lacombe, 99 N.

Boyer v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

41 Misc. 3d 987 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 26, 2013

254, 259 [1985]; Matter of Callahan v Board of Trustees of N.Y. … While it is not the court’s duty to substitute its judgment for that of the Medical Board (Matter of Ruzicka v Board of Trustees of N.Y.

In re of Bertrend

40 Misc. 536 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1903

Hirsh v. Ward, 148 N. … Maxim v. Ward, 62 App.

Pierson v. Mosher

30 Barb. 81 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1859

In Baldwin v. Brown, ( 16 N. Y.

Supreme Industrial Catering Corp. v. Fuerst

30 Misc. 2d 394 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1961

The statute (Village Law, § 89, subds. 48, 52) does not empower the Board of Trustees to prohibit peddling by a particular individual or by peddlers generally (Good Humor Corp. v. City of New York, 290 N. … Corp. v.

Townsend v. Bissell

5 Thomp. & Cook 583 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1875

Brown v. Dawson, 12 Ad. & El. 628. The question of the actual possession of lands in a case like this is not one of title, which ousts the justice’s court of jurisdiction. Ehle v. Quackenboss, 6 Hill, 537 .

People ex rel. Consolidated Gas Co. v. Myers

19 N.Y.S. 723 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1892

We do not think, under the present, condition of the law, that a writ of certiorari will lie to review the action of the board of revision and correction of assessment lists. In the case of Sixth Avenue R. Co. v. … Co. v.

Supervisors of Richmond v. Van Clief

3 Thomp. & Cook 458 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1874

And it was expressly held by the old supreme court in Supervisors of Onondaga v. … In this case, however, I am relieved from the consideration of this question, since it appears that the general term of this departnient, in the case of Richmond County v.

Schreiber v. Town of Cheektowaga

195 Misc. 748 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1949

(Lizza & Sons v. Town of Hempstead, 175 Misc. 383, 384 ; see same 69 N. Y. S. 2d 296, afifd. 272 App. Div. 921 .) … What the town board did when they adopted these two resolutions of exemption was to pass them for the reasons therein stated as an amendment to the ordinance of June 28, 1948.

Goldsmith v. Outdoor Advertising Co.

147 Misc. 536 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1933

(Reynolds v. Van Beuren, 155 N. Y. 120 ; Hess v. Roberts, 124 App. Div. 328 ; Realty Advertising & Supply Co. v. Hickson, 184 id. 168; United *539 Merchants Realty & Improvement Co. v. N. Y. … Gude Co. v. Farley, 28 id. 184; Williams v. Hylan, 126 id. 807; Greenwood Lake & P. J. R. R. Co. v. N. Y. R. R. Co., 134 N. Y. 435 ; Mehlman v. Atlantic Amusement Co., 65 Misc. 25 .)

Small v. Minneapolis Electro-Matrix Co.

10 N.Y.S. 456 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1890

Abbot v. Rubber Co., 33 Barb. 578, 591 . … Beveridge v. Railroad Co., 112 N. Y. 1 , 19 N. E. Rep. 489.

Albany Exchange Savings Bank v. Winne

168 Misc. 853 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1938

The prior mortgage indebtedness to the plaintiff which had been assumed by the defendant Samuel Feldman as grantee in the conveyance from Eazzey Brown and Jennie Brown, was likewise assumed by the Fredericksens, with the … In Drury v. Clark ( 16 How.

O'Rourke v. People

5 Thomp. & Cook 496 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

Behan v. People, 17 N. Y. 520 ; Morris v. People, 2 N. Y. Sup. 219. … Behan v. People, 17 N. Y. 516 ; Hill v. People, 20 id. 363; Foote v. People, not yet reported. But the conclusions above stated require that a new trial be granted.