Case law

Dexter v. Town Board

68 Misc. 2d 293 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1971

Petitioners seek to annul the action of the Town Board on July 12, 1971 in amending the ordinance and rezoning the property in a B-l business district. … (Rodgers v. Village of Tarrytown, 302 N. Y. 115, 124 .) In examining the facts herein in the light of these rules the following findings are apparent.

Ullian v. Town Board

68 Misc. 2d 393 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1971

Corp. v. Board of Appeals of Vil. of Amityville, 309 N. Y. 730 ; Marcus v. Village of Mamaroneck, 283 N. Y. 325 ). … Board of Zoning Appeals, 301 N. Y. 86 ; Matter of Badish v. O’Regan, 212 N. Y. S. 2d 632; but see Matter of Midgett v.

Brown v. J. P. Morgan & Co.

177 Misc. 763 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1941

(Brown v. Morgan & Co., Inc., 177 Misc. 626 .) Counsel for the respective parties submitted a proposed form of judgment. … Palmer, 256 Fed. 680, 685 ; Brown v. Morgan & Co., Inc., supra.)

Marsh v. Brown

25 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 319 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1879

It was held in the case of Lawrence v. Lindsay ( 68 N. … And the appellant was prohibited by the referee from answering any questions in reference to this, by way of explanation, denial or otherwise. *323 It was said in the case of Smith v.

Brown v. Kings County Fire Insurance

31 How. Pr. 508 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1865

Reformed Protestant Dutch Church v. Brown

29 Barb. 335 · New York Supreme Court · May 2, 1859

(Hamilton and Deansville Plank Road Co. v. Rice, 7 Barb. 157 . Stanton, Pres’t, v. Wilson, 2 Hill, 153 . Trustees of Farmington Academy v. Allen, 14 Mass. Rep. 172 .)

Brown v. Curran

21 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 260 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1878

(Lawrence v. Fox, 20 N. Y., 268 ; Arnold v. Nichols, 64 N. Y., 117 , and cases there cited.) … In this lies the distinction between the case in hand and Barlow v. Myers ( 64 N. Y., 41 ), in so far as it is important to mark a difference between the cases.

Burchetta v. Town Board

140 Misc. 2d 1050 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1988

(Matter of Di Veronica v Arsenault, 124 AD2d 442 [3d Dept 1986]; Matter of Tehan v Scrivani, 97 AD2d 769 [2d Dept 1983].) … This Town Board, unlike the Town Boards involved in, for example, Di Veronica (supra), Tehan (supra) and Matter of Nielsen v Planning Bd. ( 110 AD2d 767 [2d Dept 1985]), complied with the procedural requirements of SEQRA

Calhoun v. Town Board

94 Misc. 2d 78 · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 1978

v Sindermann, 408 US 593 ; Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564 ; Fuentes v Shevin, 407 US 67 ; Bell v Burson, 402 US 535 ; Sniadach v Family Fin. … Co., 395 US 337 ; Wisconsin v Constantineau, 400 US 433 ; Groppi v Leslie, 404 US 496 ; Boddie v Connecticut, 401 US 371 ; Goldberg v Kelly, 397 US 254 ).

Steger v. Board of Examiners of the Board of Education

171 Misc. 195 · New York Supreme Court · May 22, 1939

The right to such a test to check up possible error of one examiner is not absolute, although the wisdom thereof is suggested by the Court of Appeals in Matter of Sloat v. Board of Examiners ( 274 N. Y. 367, 372 ). … the members of that board.

Frankson v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

4 Misc. 3d 609 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 22, 2004

Since there are substantial questions that arise with respect to the issue of Brown & Williamson’s successor’s liability for torts committed by its predecessor, and assuming without deciding that question in favor of Brown … Since Brown & Williamson’s primary role in the period that the plaintiff smoked was its role in the conspiracy, the $6,000,000 assessed against Brown & Williamson is reduced to $4,000,000.

Local School Board No. 8 v. Board of Education

62 Misc. 2d 158 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1970

of Community School Boards. … The board’s proposed plan provided for substantial alterations in the then existing local school board districts. A new district was created.

Brun v. George W. Brown, Inc.

56 Misc. 2d 577 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1968

Brown, Inc. The tractor was coupled to a trailer owned by defendant Auclair, Inc., and leased to the defendant George W. Brown, Inc. The tractor and trailer were being used in the business of defendant George W. … The movants contend that the attachment should be vacated, setting forth all the arguments advanced in the Seider case, and later in Simpson v. Loehmann (21 N Y 2d 305) and Victor v.

Miles v. Town Board

68 Misc. 2d 353 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1971

(Matter of Paliotto v. Cohalan, 6 A D 2d 886, affd. 8 N Y 2d 1065; Matter of Neddo v. Schrade, 270 N. Y. 97, 102 .) … There is undoubtedly no question but that a town board is a “ board 77 within the meaning of the section (Matter of Tobin v.

Cottrell v. Board of Education

181 Misc. 645 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1943

Y. 485 ; Nelson v. Board of Higher Education of City of N. Y., 263 App. Div. 144 , affd. 288 N. Y. 649 ; Matter of Adams v. Board of Higher Education of City of N. Y., N. Y. L. J. … (Matter of Frankle v. Board of Education of City of N. Y., 173 Misc. 1050 , mod. 259 App. Div. 1006 , affd. as mod. 285 N. Y. 541 ; Matter of Sokolove v. Board of Education, N. Y. City, 176 Misc. 1016 .)

Haupt v. Teachers' Retirement Board

28 Misc. 2d 686 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1960

And the Birnbaum case dealt with the 1946 actuarial table adopted by the State Retirement Board. … By dictum, Roddy v. Valentine ( 268 N.

Daniman v. Board of Education

202 Misc. 915 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1952

In his concurring opinion in the 1951 Dennis case (Dennis v. United States, 341 U. … (Matter of Humphrey v. State Ins. Fund, 298 N. Y. 327 .)

Marton v. Town Board

115 Misc. 2d 174 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 12, 1982

Brown v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.

4 N.Y.S. 422 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1889

In Jackson v. … St. 102; Hoyt v. Jaques, 129 Mass. 286 ; Downey v. Bissell, 4 Fed. Rep. 55; Stokes v.

Schaus v. Town Board

83 Misc. 2d 726 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1975

(Matter of Smithtown v Howell, 31 NY2d 365 ; General Construction Law, § 41.) … A similar factual situation was presented in Marcus v Incorporated Vil. of Spring Valley ( 24 AD2d 1021 ), the facts of which are reviewed in Iannarone v Caso ( 59 Misc 2d 212, 215 ).