Case law

Lehrman v. Board of Examiners of the Board of Education

22 Misc. 2d 348 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1959

V, § 6; Matter of Sloat v. Board of Examiners, 274 N. Y. 367 ). An examination of the record of petitioner’s interview test discloses a reasonable basis for her failing rating. … Moreover, the recently decided case of Matter of Walker v. Board of Examiners ( 22 Misc 2d 345 , affd. 7 A D 2d 968, motion for leave to appeal denied 6 N Y 2d 707) is dispositive of the instant proceeding.

Woolsey v. Brown

18 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 52 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1877

Brown. Brown desiring to appeal to the Court of Appeals, executed the undertaking required by the Code for that purpose, with the respondent, Mary A. … Brown, as one of his sureties, which undertaking contained also the following provision : “And the said Mary A.

Sharpley v. Brown

50 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 374 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1887

.: In Volans v. Owen ( 74 N. … Y., *376 338 ), Kellogg v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company (79 id., 72) and the like.

Turner v. Brown

13 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 331 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1876

But, as was said in Gray v. Barton ( 55 N. … They, together, had rooms, as boarders, in the house occupied by the plaintiff and her husband, in whose family they ■ boarded. Mr.

Kuhn v. Brown

8 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 244 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1874

(Mallory v. Gillett, 21 N. Y., 413 .) Wcvrren G. Brown, for the respondents, insisted that the premise of Alcott was legal and valid, and could be enforced. (Gale v. … Gale v. Nixon et al., 6 Cow., 445 ; Roberts on Frauds, 121; Webster v. Zeilly, 52 Barb., 482 . Phillips v. Berger, 2 Barb., 608 . 6 Cow., 448 .

Crandall v. Brown

25 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 461 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1879

(Greene v. Burke, 23 Wend., 490 .) But constructive possession cannot be taken under a chattel mortgage. The right to possession is by virtue of the contract and not, as in an execution, by virtue of the law.

Rawley v. Brown

25 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 456 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1879

. *457 Berrett v. … It is repeated in White v. Brown ( 5 Lans., 78 ).

Gooding v. Brown

42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 153 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1885

(Fox v. Gould, 5 How., 278 ; Fox v. Fox , 22 id., 454, 469; S. C., 24 id., 385 ; Duncan v. DeWitt, 7 Hun, 184 . … (People v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 29 N. Y., 426 ; Burke v. Candee, 63 Barb., 555 .)

Clifton v. Brown

34 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 231 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1882

In Washburn v. Herrick ( 4 How. Pr., 15 ), to which reference is made in the case of Cusson v. … In the case of Ostrander v.

Walker v. Board of Examiners of the Board of Education

22 Misc. 2d 345 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1957

Section 6 of article V- does not require that all parts of a competitive examination be competitive in character. … (Matter of Sloat v. Board of Examiners, 274 N. Y. 367 .)

Best v. Brown

32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 223 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1881

(Fisher v. Hall, 41 N. Y., 416 ; Brackett v. Barney, 28 N. Y., 333 .) … In the case of Deyermand v.

Lane v. Brown

27 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 382 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1880

Brown upon the death of the testator. … He then proceeds to call attention to certain English cases (Campbell v. Campbell, 4 Bro., 15; Morley v. Bird, 3 Ves., 628; Crooke v. De Vandes, 9 id., 197; Jackson v.

Brown v. Smith

20 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 408 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1878

(Boynton v. Andrews, 63 N. Y., 93 ; Boynton v. Hatch, 47 id., 225 ; Schenck v. Andrews , 57 id., 133 .) Boynton v. … In Schenck v. Andrews ( 46 N. Y., 589 ), the question arose upon demurrer.

Lang v. Brown

13 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 256 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

Brown v. Lyddy

18 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 451 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1877

(Day v. Hammond, 57 N. Y. R., 479.) … (Day v. Hammond, supra.)

Rose v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

10 Misc. 3d 680 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 29, 2005

Rainbow v Elia Bldg. … The defendants, citing FDA v Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. ( 529 US 120, 137-139 [2000]), contended that: “Congress . . . has foreclosed the removal of tobacco products from the market. . .

Weiss v. Planning Board

130 Misc. 2d 381 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1985

In any case, we find no arbitrariness, capriciousness, or irrationality in the Planning Board’s actions (Matter of Orchard Assoc. v Planning Bd., 114 AD2d 850 ). … Meade v North Country Co-op. Ins.

Brown v. North Country Community College

63 Misc. 2d 442 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1970

The plaintiff, Lawrence Brown, was a student at the North Country Community College. … In one recently reported case, a community college was referred to as a “ partnership ” (Meyer v. Wiess, 25 A D 2d 174).

Epstein v. Board of Examiners of the Board of Education

162 Misc. 718 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1936

Peixotto v. Board of Education, 212 N. Y. 463, 466 ; Matter of Crispell v. Rust, 149 Misc. 464, 466 ; cf. Matter of Agoglia v. Mulrooney, 259 N. … Walrath v. O’Brien, 112 App. Div. 97 ; Matter of McDowell v. Board of Education, 104 Misc. 564, 568 ; People ex rel. Keyser v. Board of Education, 32 id. 63, 66.)

Groat v. Town Board

100 Misc. 2d 326 · New York Supreme Court · May 3, 1979

(Burt v Smith, 181 NY 1, 5; Lincoln First Bank of Rochester v Siegel, 60 AD2d 270, 280 .) Accordingly, plaintiff Douglas F. Groat’s cause of action for malicious prosecution should be dismissed. … (Roher v State of New York, 279 App Div *330 1116, 1117 .) Moreover, Mrs. Groat would clearly have no cause of action for mental anguish. ( Roher, supra; Howard v Lecher, 42 NY2d 109, 112 .)