Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

0.89s

  • Brush v. Shuster

    3 Abb. N. Cas. 73 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1876

    A judicial sale is never set aside for inadequacy of price alone (Livingston v. Byrne, 11 Johns. 555 ; Duncan v. Dodd, 2 Paige, 101 ; Am. Ins. Co. v. Oakley, 9 Id. 260; Brown v. Frost, 10 Id. 248; Collier v. … The defendant Schuster had the same right to purchase as any stranger (Brown v. Frost, 10 Paige, 247 ). The judgment authorized any of the parties to purchase.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mitnacht v. Hawthorne

    31 Misc. 378 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1900

    . § 500; Flack v. O’Brien, 19 Misc. Rep. 399 ; McManus v. Ins. Co., 22 Misc. Rep. 269 ; Green v. Brown, 22 Misc. Rep. 279 ; Von Hagen v. Water *379 bury Mfg. Go., 22 Misc. Rep. 580 ; Hicks v. … Rep. 585 ; Kelly v. Sammis, 25 Misc. Rep. 6 ; Meurer v. Brinkman, 25 Misc. Rep. 12 ; Laurie v. Duer, 30 Misc. Rep. 154 ).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Keator v. Dalton

    29 Misc. 692 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1899

    Kay v. Whittaker, 44 N. Y. 565 ; Seidman v. Geib, 16 Daly, 434 ; Cohn v. Goldman, 76 N. Y. 284 ; Wood v. Amory, 105 id. 278. … This subject is fully discussed in the opinion in Press Publishing Company v. Holahan, handed down herewith. 29 Misc. Rep. 684 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Burroughs v. Willett

    6 Abb. Pr. 37 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1857

    (See Runkle v. Ells, 4 How. Pr. R., 288 ; The Bank of Orange v. Brown, 3 Wend., 158 ; Bretherton v. Wood, 3 Brod. & B., 54; 2 Lord Raym., 909 ; 2 Chilt. Pl., 155, 320; Hallenbacks v. Fisk, 8 Wend., 547 ; 4 Ib., 618.) … (Bank of Orange v. Brown, 3 Wend., 158, 168 .) The suit against Burroughs was founded on tort; the judgment record shows this fact.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hubbard v. Tobin

    15 Misc. 2d 65 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1958

    An application for the desired change of zone was made and was presented to and considered by the Village’s Planning Board (to which the matter was referred for a report thereon) and by the Board of Trustees of the village … Y. 196 ; Nibloch v. Sprague, 200 N. Y. 390 ; Grannis v. Stevens, 216 N. Y. 583 .)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Riverview Estates, Inc. v. City of New York

    38 Misc. 2d 607 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1963

    November *608 16,1939 the Board of Estimate adopted certain rules for apportioning the costs of assessable physical improvements; that on March 25, 1954 the Board of Estimate approved a resolution that the combined sewer … (Cooper Union v. City of New York, 272 App. Div. 438 , 440; Matter of City of New York [Woodhaven Blvd.-Queens], 260 App.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Town of Porter v. Chem-Trol Pollution Services, Inc.

    91 Misc. 2d 42 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1977

    (See Town of Union v J & M Pallet Co., 50 AD2d 628 , City of Yonkers v Rentways, 304 NY 499 .) … (Sheafer v Breen, 263 App Div 135 ; Orr v Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., 168 App Div 548 .)

    Reversed on other grounds by Town of Porter v. Chem-Trol Pollution Services, Inc., 60 A.D.2d 987 (1978)Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Bristol

    93 Misc. 626 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1916

    People v. Keenan, 110 App. Div. 537 . There is in fact no substantial dispute on any question of fact involved in this application. There is not such a denial of any allegation as raises an issue of fact. … In a fund made up practically in the same way the court has held in Matter of Mahon v. Board of Education, 171 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Disciplinary Action v. Manigaulte

    63 Misc. 2d 765 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1970

    Petitioner proceeds apparently by way of an article 78 proceeding (there appears to be no other jurisdictional basis for the application) to prohibit the respondent Board of Education from conducting a disciplinary hearing … The Board of Education will, therefore, not be prohibited from conducting the hearing. (Oleshko v. New York State Liq. Auth., 29 A D 2d 84, affd. 21 N Y 2d 778. Cf. Langemyr v. Campbell, 21 NY 2d 796 .)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Stephens v. Humphreys

    14 N.Y.S. 910 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1891

    It did not appear that the bond and mortgage were bought solely that the attorneys might bring a foreclosure first, and therefore the case is not controlled by what was decided in Browning v. Marvin, 100 N.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dougherty v. Rockaway Operating Co.

    163 Misc. 806 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1936

    Co. v. Hoyer, 214 N. Y. 26 ), and, therefore, also subject to any restriction which might reasonably be expected to be placed upon the user of streets in such localities.” (Drabinsky v. Seagate Assn., 239 N. … (Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co., 276 U. S. 518 , and authorities therein cited.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Contessa v. Power

    25 Misc. 2d 93 · New York Supreme Court · May 23, 1960

    Petitioner seeks to invalidate the designating petition filed with the Board of Elections by respondent, Arthur A. … In support of this argument, the petitioner relies mainly upon the following cases: Matter of O’Connor v. Power ( 24 Misc 2d 918 ); Matter of Bloom v. Power ( 21 Misc 2d 885 ); Matter of Weisberger v. Cohen (22 N. Y.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • German v. Bartlett

    97 Misc. 2d 837 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1978

    No. 6, supra, p 376; Matter of Board of Educ. v State Div. of Human Rights, 35 NY2d 675 , affg 42 AD2d 854 ). … (State Div. of Human Rights v Board of Educ., supra, p 1115.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Magee v. Badger & Potter

    30 Barb. 246 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1859

    (Hall v. Wilson, 16 Barb. 548 , and cases there cited.) Hone of the exceptions to the charge are well taken. … (Haggart v. Morgan, 1 Seld. 422. Jones v. Osgood, 2 id. 233.)

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Drury v. Doherty

    127 Misc. 263 · New York Supreme Court · May 8, 1926

    Each party claimed its own board to be the legally constituted board of directors. … S. v. Coxe, 18 How. [U. S.] 105.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hathaway v. Town of Homer

    5 Lans. 267 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1871

    That there was an error was proved by the clerk of the enrolling board, and established after a full investigation by a committee of the board of supervisors. … (See, also, Supervisor of Galway v. Stimson, 4 Hill, 136 ; Town of Duanesburgh, v. Jenkins, 46 Barb., 294, 310 ; Commissioners of Highways of Cortlandville v. Peck, 5 Hill, 215 ; Overseers of Hebron v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Pioneer Transportation Corp. v. Kalajian

    122 Misc. 2d 412 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1984

    It is further undisputed that over the recent years the State Education Department, and thus the New York City Board of Education, have consistently interpreted the term “national consumer price index” as referring to the … Sessa v State of New York, 63 AD2d 334, 335 , affd 47 NY2d 976 ; Kinney v Kinney, 48 AD2d 1002 ; Franz v Dregalla, 94 AD2d 963, 964 ; McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes, §§51, 52).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lasker v. Moreida

    38 Misc. 2d 348 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1963

    In West View Hills v. … Iron & Steel Co. v. Lefkowitz, 7 A D 2d 647; Hatch v. Visual Enterprises, 279 App. Div. 1083 ; Grobman v. Freiman, 3 Misc 2d 656, 660 .)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Stearns v. Gilchrist

    84 Misc. 2d 519 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1976

    Matter of Sylvander v Stewart, 36 AD2d 567 ). … of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564 ; Wisconsin v Constantineau, 400 US 433 ).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Gruber v. Fairport Central School District

    147 Misc. 2d 545 · New York Supreme Court · May 23, 1990

    Consolidated Rail Corp., 74 NY2d 39 ; Sega v State of New York, 60 NY2d 183, 191 ). … or boards curved up at one end”.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.