Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

1.14s

  • Patchin v. Ritter

    27 Barb. 34 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1858

    (Petrie v. Woodworth, 3 Caines, 219 . The Methodist Church v. Tryon, 1 Denio, 451 .) The case of Brown v. … There Brown indorsed a bill of exchange in pencil mark with the figures “ 1, 2, 8.”

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Ridgway v. Barnard

    28 Barb. 613 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1858

    The case of Hinds v. *615 Doubleday, ( 21 Wend. 223 ,) is decisive of the question in dispute. The court there held that the statute not only confers a benefit but imposes a duty upon the old sheriff. … Strong, Eraott and Brown, Justices.] The judgment should be affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Pikul

    64 Misc. 2d 650 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1970

    Millspaugh, 9 A D 2d 715, affd. 7 N Y 2d 756; De Casare v. Fisher, 11 A D 2d 750; Duryea v. McNab, 232 N. Y. … In so holding, I am mindful of the decision in Matter of Podkulski v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • New York Hotel Trades Council & Hotel Ass'n Insurance Fund v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

    1 Misc. 2d 245 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1955

    (Greeff v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc., 160 N. Y. 19, 29 ; Gerdes v. Reynolds, 281 N. Y. 180 ; Didier v. Macfadden Publications, 299 N. Y. 49, 53 ; Red Robin Stores v. Rose, 274 App. Div. 462 .) … (Schants v. Oakman, 163 N. Y. 148,155-158 ; Uhlman v. New York Life Ins. Co., supra, p. 431.)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Scott v. Curran

    198 Misc. 246 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1950

    (Matter of Enright v. Board of Elections of City of New York, 257 App. Div. 601 , appeal dismissed 282 N. Y. 691 ; Matter of Boschetti ,v. Heffernan, 275 App. Div. 999 , affd. 300 N. Y. 454 .) … Matter of Lauer v. Board of Elections of City of New York, 262 N. Y. 416 ; Matter of Wheeler v. Curran, 192 Misc. 1055 , affd. 274 App. Div. 911 ; Matter of Kagan v. Katz, 275 App. Div. 1065 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Consumer-Farmer Milk Cooperative, Inc. v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees Local No. 584

    29 Misc. 2d 691 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1960

    (San Diego Unions v. Garmon, 359 U. S. 236, 244 , supra.) … In Garmon , the Supreme Court adopted the rule that any doubt must be resolved in favor of the ‘ exclusive primary competence of the Board ’. (Dooley v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • E. R. Brackett Co. v. Kornblum

    71 Misc. 123 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1911

    The law is well settled by Judge Earl,' in Stone v. Browning, 51 N. Y. 211 , 215: “There was no part payment of the purchase-money nor note or memorandum of the contract. … (Brand v. Focht, 3 Keyes, 409 .) Judge Wright, in Shindler v. Houston, 1 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

    146 Misc. 2d 752 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1990

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Duane Thomas Loft Tenants Ass'n v. Sylvan Lawrence Co.

    117 Misc. 2d 360 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1982

    Assoc. v Lenox Hill Hosp., 38 NY2d 525, 528 ; Mehlman Mgt. Corp. v *367 Meyers, 51 AD2d 949 ; cf. Axelrod Co. v Duffin, NYLJ, Sept. 3, 1982, p 6, col 1). … The clear purpose of the statutory enactment is to confer upon the loft board all issues with respect to coverage, including rent disputes *368 and to remove these matters from the courts (see Axelrod Co. v Duffin, NYLJ,

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Heard v. Commissioners of Charities

    51 N.Y.S. 375 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1896

    See Swift v. Mayor, etc., of New York, 83 N. Y. 528 ; People v. Board of Com’rs of Public Parks, 97 N. … See, also, Gardner v. Board, 4 Sandf. 153 , 10 N. Y. 409 . The denial of this application might well be rested upon the point just referred to.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Plattsburgh Publishing Co. v. Looby

    124 Misc. 761 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1925

    Div. 786 ); Heughes v. Board of Education (37 id. 180) and in the authorities referred to in the opinions in those cases. … Bonheur v. Christ, 208 N. Y. 6 ; People ex rel. Guernsey v. Somers, 153 App. Div. 623; People ex rel. R. & J. Co. v. Wiggins, 199 N. Y. 382 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Town of Queensbury v. City of Glens Falls

    19 Misc. 2d 671 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1959

    Whatever the view may have been years ago (see, e.g., Oeters v. City of New York, 270 N. Y. 364 ; O’Brien v. Town of Greenburgh, 239 App. Div. 555 , affd. on other grounds 266 N. … Here the situation is in some respects analogous to that presented in Parsons v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Silberman v. Katz

    54 Misc. 2d 956 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1967

    In Matter of Kupferman v. … (See, also, Mills v. Sweeney, supra).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Wayne & Ontario Collegiate Institute v. Greenwood

    40 Barb. 72 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1863

    The principal questions involved in this case, it seems to me, have been decided already in the case of this plaintiff v. Smith, ( 36 Barb. 577 ,.) … the same persons named in the charter as the first board of trustees of the plaintiff, and acted as such trustees from that time.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Montgomery v. Smead

    97 Misc. 283 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1916

    Warrin v. Baldwin, 105 N. Y. 534, 537 ; Ayers v. Lawrence, 59 id. 192; Squires v. Preston, 82 Hun, 88 . … Hendrickson v. City of New York, 24 Misc. Rep. 231 ; revd., 38 App. Div. 480 ; affd. 160 N. Y. 144 ; Lawrence v. Smith, 24 Misc. Rep. 233 ; affd., 39 App. Div. 639 ; 165 N. Y. 635 ; Talcott v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Haws

    34 Barb. 69 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1861

    (Town of Guilford v. Supervisors of Chenango County, 3 Kernan, 143. The People v. The Mayor &c. of Brooklyn, 4 Comst. 419.) … Justice Oakley in Brady v. The Supervisors of New York, *79 (2 Sand. S. C.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Walton v. Walton

    32 Barb. 203 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1860

    , is not entitled to the judg.ment of separation from bed and board. … I said, in the case of Auld v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Crosson v. Newman

    149 Misc. 2d 499 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1990

    Hosp. v New York State Labor Relations Bd., 32 NY2d 314, 321 .) … Acknowledging PERB’s expertise in this area (Matter of Bivins v Helsby, 55 AD2d 230, 232 , supra), this court cannot say that PERB’s uniting decision lacks a rational basis (Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 ) and is therefore

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Welling v. Fullen

    164 Misc. 456 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1937

    (Matter of Potts v. Kaplan, 264 N. Y. 110 ; Matter of Kraus v. Singstad, 275 id. 302.) … Rosenthal v. Travis ( 169 App.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Oakley v. Mayor of New York

    6 Thomp. & Cook 221 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1875

    In the case of Collins v. … Corp., §§ 172, 173 (2d ed.); Heself v. City of Sacramento, 2 Cal. 580 ; Hatch v. Mann, 15 Wend. 44 ; Palmer v. Mayor of New York, 2 Sandf. 318 ; People ex rel. Phoenix v. Supervisors of New York, 1 Hill, 362; Mallory v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.