Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.94s
Dairy Barn Stores, Inc. v. Perlman
40 Misc. 2d 959 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1963
that this was contrary to subdivision 6 of section 75.0 of the Building Zone Ordinance, and also that since the plans called for on-premises parking of vehicles, the petitioner had failed to get the authorization of the Board … (See, also, Matter of Tower Management Corp. v. Thatcher, 271 N. Y. 94 ; Radano v. Town of Huntington, 281 App. Div. 682 , affd. 305 N. Y. 911 ; Matter of Perosi Homes v. Maniscalco, 15 A D 2d 563.)
Cited 1 timesPublished167 Misc. 218 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1938
(Greene v. Knox, 175 N. Y. 432, 438 .) Section 42 of the Village Law reads as follows: “ § 42. Eligibility to office. … In Matter of Becraft v. Strobel ( 158 Misc. 844 ), Dowling, J., rendered a similar decision on analogous facts. Judgment for the defendants, without costs.
Cited 0 timesPublished2 Hill & Den. 131 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1841
(a) See Hubbly v. Brown, (16 John. JR. 70.)
Cited 0 timesPublished27 Misc. 2d 825 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1960
Such knowledge is special, if not exclusive, and justifies their examination as reluctant, if not hostile, witnesses (Courtland v. Brown, Harris, Stevens, 6 A D 2d 789) in the circumstances of this case. … Royce v. Ziegfeld, 224 App. Div. 651 ).
Cited 1 timesPublished120 Misc. 2d 1059 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1983
(See, e.g., Teachers Ins. & Annuity Assn. v Shamrock Broadcasting Co., 521 F Supp 638 ; Schnell v Schnall, 550 F Supp 650, 653 .) … (See Davis v Alaska, 415 US 308 .)
Cited 5 timesPublished173 Misc. 2d 886 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1997
Brown v Board of Supervisors, 3 How Prac [NS] 1, 3 [1885], affd 39 Hun 654 [1886], affd 102 NY 691 [1886]). … Burgess v Risley, 66 How Prac 67 [1883]; People ex rel. Saunders v Board of Supervisors, 1 Sheld 517 [1875]; People ex rel. Hadley v Supervisors of Albany County, 28 How Prac 22 [1864]).
Cited 0 timesPublished196 Misc. 770 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1949
Justice Bergan in Matter of Rentz v. … The provision in subdivision 1 for the reconvening of the board of inspectors of election “ if necessary ” (italics mine) has no applicability here since it is not necessary to reconvene such board in order to strike respondent
Cited 2 timesPublished66 Misc. 2d 5 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1971
Mayham v. Dickson ( 138 App. Div. 606 ) ; People ex rel. Elmira Advertiser Assn. v. Gorman ( 169 App. Div. 891 , app. dsmd. 222 N. Y. 712 ) ; Matter of Steuben Advocate v. … Board of Supervisors ( 5 Misc 2d 627 ) ; Matter of News-Review Pub. Corp. v. Lomenzo ( 53 Misc 2d 370 , affd. 28 A D 2d 823) ; Burns v. Joyce ( 33 Misc 2d 1088 ).
Cited 3 timesPublished42 Barb. 582 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 8, 1862
I see no reason, and am not aware of any principle, which will justify an allowance of such damages; and I refer to the cases of Green v. Eales, (2 Adolph. & Ellis, N. S. 225,) and- Thompson v. … Bhnott, Brown, Scrughcm and Zott, Justices.]
Cited 2 timesPublished154 Misc. 2d 252 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1992
Thus plaintiffs’ attempt to strike section 50 (7) and section 50-a as being unconstitutional is not subject to the four-month time bar established for article 78 proceedings (see, Lai Chun Chan Jin v Board of Estimate, 101 … In view of this determination, the court need not take a position on *259 the remaining constitutional claims raised by the plaintiffs other than noting that the due process claim is without merit (see, Board of Regents v
Cited 1 timesPublished36 Misc. 3d 777 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 22, 2012
case, taking into account the needs of the custodial parent to maintain a household and provide certain necessaries]; Wortman v Wortman, 11 AD3d 604 [2d Dept 2004] [since the defendant is required to pay room and board, … of Hammill v Mayer, 66 AD3d 1196 [3d Dept 2009]; Matter of Benno v Benno, 33 AD3d 1143 [3d Dept 2006].)
Cited 1 timesPublished139 Misc. 779 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1931
Act, § 473; Westchester Mortgage Co. v. Grand Rapids & I. R. R. Co., 246 N. Y. 194 ; Board of Education v. Van Zandt, 119 Misc. 124 ; affd., without opinion, 204 App. Div. 856 ; affd., 234 N. Y. 644 .) … Eldred v. Palmer, 154 N. Y. 133 .) As stated in People ex rel. Eldred v.
Cited 15 timesPublished55 Misc. 459 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1907
The local board recommended to the board of public improvement that proceedings be initiated to macadamize said avenue. … Folmsbee v. City of Amsterdam, 142 N. Y. 118 ; Fuller v. City of Mount Vernon, 171 id. 247 .
Cited 1 timesPublished169 Misc. 2d 382 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1996
Where language is statutorily mandated as part of the content of a petition, it is considered a matter of substance and not form (Matter of Frome v Board of Elections, 57 NY2d 741 [1982]; 4 see too, Matter of Sheehan v Scaringe … (Matter of Sheehan v Scaringe, supra; Matter of Liss v Sadowski, 59 NY2d 635 [1983], cited in Matter of Morgan v Jenkins, 208 AD2d 732 [2d Dept 1994].)
Cited 5 timesPublishedJamur Productions Corp. v. Quill
51 Misc. 2d 501 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1966
Auth. v. Quill, 48 Misc 2d 940 ; Gilmartin v. O’Grady, N. Y. L. J., Jan. 18,1966, p. 16, col. 3; see Weinstein v. New York City Tr. Auth., 49 Misc 2d 170 ). … Co. v. Brown, 252 F. 2d 149, 156 , cert, den. 356 U. S. 949 ). Unions would be liable in damages unless a “ legal privilege affords them immunity ” (1 Harper & James, Torts, p. 523).
Cited 13 timesPublishedNovelty Textile Mills, Inc. v. Hopkins
145 Misc. 2d 583 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1989
Such regulations by the banking board may include such restrictions as the banking board finds necessary or proper, and shall require that no loan or advance be made in an amount which, when added to the aggregate amount … (Schneider v Phelps, 41 NY2d 238 , 243.) Consequently, it is asserted by defendant that the note and mortgage should be declared void and ordered to be surrendered and canceled.
Cited 2 timesPublished431 Fifth Avenue Corp. v. City of New York
184 Misc. 1001 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1945
(Euclid v. Ambler Co., 272 U. S. 365, 386 ; Dowsey v. Village of Kensington, 257 N. Y. 221, 228 ; McCabe v. City of New York, 170 Misc. 325, mod. 281 N. Y. 349 ; Ulmer Park Realty Co. v. City of New York, 267 App. … In organizing cities the Legislature may distribute executive and legislative powers as it chooses (Matter of Mooney v. Cohen, 272 N. Y. 33 ; Matter of LaGuardia v. Smith, 288 N. Y. 1 ).
Cited 0 timesPublished2 N.Y.S. 121 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1888
Benjamin v. Benjamin, 5 N. Y. 383 . … Dolittle v. Eddy, 7 Barb. 74 ; People v. Annis, 45 Barb. 304 ; Haywood v. Miller, 3 Hill, 90 ; Russell v. Russell, 32 How. 400 ; Williams v. Bigelow, 11 How. 83 ; Sims v. Humphrey, 4 Denio, 185 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Stalter v. Lynch
128 Misc. 36 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1926
Section 53 also provides that in the case of a tie vote, the board of trustees shall determine by lot “ which of them shall be deemed elected.” … Worth v. Kanar, 80 Misc. 552 ; People ex rel. DeJohn v. Lytle, 116 id. 1.) Judgments for the plaintiffs.
Cited 1 timesPublished3 Abb. N. Cas. 73 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1876
A judicial sale is never set aside for inadequacy of price alone (Livingston v. Byrne, 11 Johns. 555 ; Duncan v. Dodd, 2 Paige, 101 ; Am. Ins. Co. v. Oakley, 9 Id. 260; Brown v. Frost, 10 Id. 248; Collier v. … The defendant Schuster had the same right to purchase as any stranger (Brown v. Frost, 10 Paige, 247 ). The judgment authorized any of the parties to purchase.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna