Case law

Bissell v. Bissell

7 Abb. Pr. 16 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1869

Clair, who kept the boarding-house, by her sister and her niece, who live there, and who prove that before coming there to reside the defendant engaged board for himself and wife. … Public Administrator, 3 Bradf., 151 ; Tummatty v. Tummatty, Id., 369 ; Grotgen v. Grotgen, Id., 373; Rose v. Clarke, 8 Paige, 574 ; Matter of Taylor, 9 Id., 611 ; Cheney v. Arnold, 15 N. Y., 345 ; Hayes v.

Hoyt v. Dillon

19 Barb. 644 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1855

By the Court, Brown, J. … (See also Striker v. Kelly, 2 Denio, 323 ; Beekman v. Bigham, 1 Selden, 366.)

Corbitt v. Miller

43 Barb. 305 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1865

Charles v. Marsden, 1 Taunt. 224. Caruthers v. West, 11 *309 Adol. & Ellis, 143. Sturtevant v. Ford, 4 Man. & G. 101. Thompson v. Shepherd, 12 Metc. 311 .) In Charles v. … (Brown v. Mott, 7 John. 361 .) The question then arises, whether there has been any such misappropriation of the note as to constitute a defense in favor of an accommodation maker.

Merola v. Power

60 Misc. 2d 245 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1969

Matter of Mack v. … The respondent, the Board of Elections, is directed to hold a new primary election for the office of City Councilman in and for the 7th Councilmanic District, City of New York, County of Bronx, not later than the 23d day

Harris v. Mechanicville Central School District

86 Misc. 144 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1976

(Matter of Tessier v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No., Town of Hempstead, 24 AD2d 484 , revd on other grounds, 19 NY2d 680 ; see Matter of Halloran v Kirwan, 28 NY2d 689 .) … (See Hodgkins v Central School Dist. No. 1, 50 AD 2d 73 ; Hodgkins v Central School Dist. No. 1, 48 AD2d 302 ; and also Matter of Bott v Board of Educ., 51 AD2d 81 .)

Union Agricultural Society at Palmyra, Inc. v. Sheldon

79 Misc. 2d 818 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1974

The Fourth Department in Matter of Mandis v. … (Nehrbas v. Incorporated Vil. of Lloyd Harbor, 2 N Y 2d 190, 193.)

Incorporated Village of Farmingdale v. Inglis

29 Misc. 2d 727 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1961

Justice Stoddaet wrote in Matter of Gray v. Maislen ( 17 Misc 2d 161, 162 ): “As the statute provides for a five-member board, there must be five appointed even though all need not be present to conduct a meeting.” … (See, also, Ahern v. McNab, 17 Misc 2d 162 , Hogan, J.; Matter of Clearview Gardens Fifth Corp. v. Murdock, 12 A D 2d 521; People ex rel. Henry v. Nostrand. 46 N. Y. 375, 383 .)

Creamer v. Young

16 Misc. 2d 676 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1959

The hardship, the board found also? was self-imposed. *680 The court must disagree with the Board of Zoning Appeals. … Co. v. Thatcher ( 278 N.

Jo & Wo Realty Corp. v. City of New York

140 Misc. 2d 154 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1988

This proposal was approved by the City Planning Commission in 1986, and by the City Board of Estimate in February 1987. … Corp. v County Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn., 32 NY2d 285, 290 [1973]).

Burger King Corp. v. Village of Larchmont

89 Misc. 2d 901 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1975

(See Rathkopf, Law of Zoning and Planning [4th ed], ch 4, p 4-5; Matter of Bonan Realty Corp. v Young, 16 Misc 2d 119 .) … Corp. v Murdock, 285 NY 298 ; Matter of Salem Trader Rest. Inc. v Reitfort, 63 Misc 2d 753 .)

Gallin v. National City Bank

155 Misc. 880 · New York Supreme Court · May 25, 1935

It is also stated in the opinion that in Rogers v. … Act, § 48Í; King v. Talbot, 40 N. Y. 76, 95 ; Bates v. Dresser, 251 U. S. 524 ; Ellis v. Kelsey, 241 N. Y. 374, 379, 380 .) In Bates v. Dresser (supra) Mr.

Carr v. Carr

4 Lans. 314 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1871

(Brown v. Lynch, 1 Paige, 147; McBurney v. Wellman,. 42 Barb., 390 ; Same v. Same, affirmed in the Court of Appeals; Brown v. Jones, 46 Barb., 400 ; Ryan v. Dox, 34 N. Y., 307 .) … (Swinburn v. Swinburn, 28 N. Y., *327 568 ; Siemon v. Schurck, 29 N. Y., 598 ; Lounsbury v. Purdy 18 N. Y., 518 .) Opinion of Woodhtjee, J., in McBurney v. Wellman, in the Court of Appeals.

Campbell v. Tunny

196 Misc. 2d 860 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 4, 2003

By failing to object on that basis with the Board of Elections, petitioner waived review of the claimed objections by this court (Matter of Brosnan v Black, 104 AD2d 469, 471 [1984], affd 63 NY2d 692 [1984]; Matter of Simmons … board responsibilities.

People v. Kleiner

174 Misc. 2d 261 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1997

Twine, 202 AD2d 613 [2d Dept 1994]; see also, Matter of Bell v Board of Regents, 295 NY 101 [1946]; Matter of Allen v Board of Regents, 140 AD2d 824 [3d Dept 1988]). … Following the decision of the Board, either party may appeal to the Administrative Review Board (Public Health Law § 230 [10] [i]; § 230-c [4]).

Otto Gerdau Co. v. Bowne-Morton's Stores, Inc.

208 Misc. 748 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1955

Weller v. Camp, 169 Ala 275; 52 So 929. Bertig v. Norman, 101 Ark 75 ; 141 SW 201 . Glover v. Spraker, 50 Idaho 16 ; 292 Pac 613 . Cross v. Brown, 41 NH 283. Hansen v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. … In Lopez v.

Herring v. Tylee

1 Johns. Cas. 31 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1799

People v. Ten Eyck, Shff. &c., 2 Wend 617. The prosecutor may however exhibit his interrogatories at any time before the motion is actually made. 2 Hawk. c. 22, § 1. Graham’s Pr. 2d ed, 696. As to amendment, People v. … Brown, 6 Cowen, 41.

Marks v. Regents of the University of New York

203 Misc. 837 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1951

Lodes v. Department of Health of City of N. Y., 189 N. Y. 187 ; People ex rel. Empire City Trotting Club v. State Racing Comm., 190 N. Y. 31 .) … (Matter of Small v. Moss, 277 N. Y. 501 ; Matter of Small v. Moss, 279 N. Y. 288 .)

Joffe v. Power

28 Misc. 2d 672 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1961

This proceeding, brought on by order to show cause, seeks to compel the Board of Elections to amend *673 the enrollment sheet of petitioner Gussie Kleiman, dated October 17, 1957, nunc pro tunc, to show said voter as enrolled … Section 174 of the Election Law, effective April 18, 1956, requires that a voter when enrolling ‘ ‘ Make a cross X mark or a check V mark * * * in the circle under the emblem of the party with which you wish to enroll, for

Bromley v. Town

1 Hill & Den. 373 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1841

The. statute has changed the rule which prevailed when the case oí Bunting v. Brown, (13 John. R. 425,) was decided. The act to abolish imprisonment for debt, (Statutes of 1813, p. 396,) does not touch the question.

In re the Town of Rutland

70 Misc. 82 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1910

Gregg as supervisor is a member and the presiding officer of the town board (5 Consol. … The answer by the LeRay town board refusing to join probably amounts to a waiver of the informality if any of the Rutland demand. Carey v. Smith, 2 N. Y. 60 .