Case law

Howarth v. Brown

60 Misc. 2d 587 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1968

(New London Instrument Co. v. Taffet, 38 Misc 2d 276 ; Briguglio & Gaddy v. Stevenson, 27 Misc 2d 935 ; Buchanan v. Graham, 38 Misc 2d 398 .) In Briguglio & Gaddy v. … And in Buchanan v.

Brown v. Reed

10 Misc. 2d 227 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1957

Act, § 105; Boyd v. United .States Mtge. & Trust Co., 187 N. Y. 262 ; De Witt v. Abraham Bros. Horse & Mule Co., 170 App. Div. 610 ; Evoy v. Expressmen’s Aid Soc., 66 Hun 636 , opinion in 21 N. Y. ¡3. 641; Yeager v.

Myruski v. Town Board

87 Misc. 2d 1063 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1976

Fellows v Early, 106 App Div 269 ). … He may not incur debts or expenses in excess of the amount raised for highway purposes by taxation or added for such purposes by the town board (see Matter of Flike v Strobel, 252 App Div 35 ; Gardner v Town of Cameron, 155

Brown v. Holz

5 Misc. 2d 512 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1957

The time requirements of the statute cannot be waived or modified (Campbell v. Holz, N. Y. L. J., June 21, 1955, p. 5, col. 4). … (See Matter of Levine v. Lending, 176 Misc. 462 .) The proceeding is accordingly dismissed.

Brown v. City of New York

57 Misc. 433 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1908

In Muller v. Mayor, 63 N. … This principle, as was said in Van Dolsen v. Board of Education, 162 N.

Presti v. Board of Examiners of the Board of Education

71 Misc. 2d 232 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1968

(See, also, Keays v. Conway, 105 N. Y. S. 2d 944.) … In Matter of Hall v. Leonard ( 260 App. Div. 591, 597 , affd. 285 N.

Jackson ex dem. People v. Brown

5 Wend. 590 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1830

It is shown by the production of the original mortgage, that it was sealed with the seal of the corporation ; and the resolution of the board of directors, under which the cashier acted in giving the mortgage, shews that … It was put in writing merely to perpetuate the evidence of its having been done at the request and by the authority of the board of directors.

Brown v. Reed

10 Misc. 2d 289 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1957

Y. 17 ; Cyran v. Finlay Straus, Inc., 302 N. Y. 486 ; Neaton v. Lewis Apparel Stores, 267 App. Div. 728 ). … Salisbury, 207 Misc. 785 ; Sleight v. Woods, 145 Misc. 824 ). (See Moore v. Francis, 121 N. Y. 199, 203 .)

McEnroe v. Planning Board

61 Misc. 2d 937 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1969

The authority of a Planning Board, unlike a Zoning Board of Appeals, is strictly limited by sections 276 and 277 of the Town Law. These sections specify the criteria upon which Planning Boards must rest their decision. … (Shapiro v. Town of Oyster Bay, 27 Misc 2d 844, 847 .) The petitioners allege that the evidence adduced at the hearing is inadequate to support the findings of economic injury.

Cantelli v. Town Board

28 Misc. 2d 126 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1960

Bank v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 281 N. Y. 534 ). The court has examined the papers submitted on this application in addition to the minutes of the hearing and the exhibits. … As stated in Shepard v. Village of Skaneateles ( 300 N.

Brown v. Phelps

55 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 219 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1888

Horton v. Brown

36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 654 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1883

(Bradley v. Burwell, 3 Den., 262 .) … (See, also, Willcox , v. Smith, 26 Barb., 334 ; Russell v. Lane, 1 id., 523; Fort v. Gooding, 9 id., 388; Buckhout v. Hunt, 16 How. Pr., 412 .) The case of Field v. Field ( 77 N.

Brown v. Guthrie

46 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 29 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1886

(Hyslop v. Clarke, 14 Johns., 458 ; Wakemam, v. Grover, 4 Paige, 41 ; S. C., in error, 11 Wend., 187 ; *34 Sheldon v. Dodge, 4 Den., 217 .) … If the transaction had been simply a transfer to Guthrie for the •exclusive purpose of paying his own debt, the provision as to the .surplus would not have avoided it (Leitch v. Hollister, 4 N. Y., 211 ; Dunham v.

Fuller v. Brown

42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 162 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1885

Co. v. Oakley, 9 Paige, 259 ; Kellogg v. Howell, 62 Barb., 283 ; McCotter v. Jay, 30 N. Y., 80 ; Gould v. Mortimer, 26 How., 167 .) … Brown and to Benjamin O. Brown, are entitled to no consideration, except so far as they reflect on the action and the motives of the parties to the suit in the transactions for, and of the sale after, the *168 decree.

Gooding v. Brown

42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 148 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1885

.; Phillips v. Thompson, 1 Johns. Ch., 149 ; Parkhurst v. Van Cortland, 14 Johns., 15, 35 ; Wheeler v. Reynolds, 66 N. Y., 227 ; Winchell v. Winchell, 17 N. Y. Weekly Dig., 104; Levy v. Brush, 45 N. Y., 589 ; Dung v. … In Podmore v.

Scott v. Brown

31 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1881

A motion was made to revive the action against Caroline Brown, as executrix, and for leave to issue a supplementary complaint against her as such executrix. … It seems to us to be clearly covered by the case of Cregan v. The Brooklyn Cross Town Railroad Company ( 15 N.

Brown v. 44th Street Development, LLC

48 Misc. 3d 234 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 19, 2015

In motion sequence No. 001, plaintiff Donald Brown moves for summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law §§ 240 (1) and 241 (6) pursuant to CPLR 3212. Defendants oppose the motion. … The material facts in the instant matter are as follows. *236 Plaintiff Donald Brown is a carpenter who was injured while working on the construction of a building at 550 West 45th Street in Manhattan.

Brown v. Metropolitan News Co.

149 Misc. 536 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1933

(Beardsley v. Kilmer, 236 N. Y. 80 ; Bieber Bros. News Co. v. New York Evening Post, 144 Misc. 405 , and cases therein cited.) … Reliance is placed by plaintiff upon the cases of Sultan v. Star Co., Inc. ( 106 Misc. 43 ); Langley v. Furman (132 id. 726); Finnegan v. Butler (112 id. 280); Straus v. American Pub. Assn. ( 85 App.

Brown v. People

23 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 535 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1879

(People v. Thomas, 3 Hill, 169 ; People v. Williams, 4 id., 9 ; People v. Kendall, 25 Wend., 399 ; Parmelee v. People, 8 Hun, 623 ; Sherman v. People, 13 id., 575.) … (People v. Crissie, 4 Denio, 525 ; Skiff v. People, 2 Park. Crim. Rep., 139 .) The conviction should be reversed, and the proceedings remitted to the General Sessions of Onondaga county for a new trial. Talcott, P.

Boardman v. Brown

51 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 336 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1887

(Stringham v. Stewart, 100 N. Y., 516 .) The evidence in this case discloses that the defendants were contractors in the excavation of a tunnel for the new aqueduct for New York.