Case law

Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Kreskowski

35 Misc. 2d 973 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1962

Corp. v. Brown, 15 A D 2d 578). On this application petitioner insists that respondent must first prove the uninsured status of the other automobile as a condition precedent to the right to have arbitration.

People ex rel. Curry v. Green

64 Barb. 493 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1873

(The People *497 v. Sups. of Columbia, 4 Cowen, 146; The People v. same defendants, id. note.) … (The People v.

Dobert v. Troy City Railway Co.

36 N.Y.S. 105 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1895

In Terry v. Jewett, 78 N. … In Brown v. Railway Co. (Super. N. Y.) 4 N. Y.

Bennett v. Boyle

40 Barb. 551 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1863

By the Court, Brown, J. … See also Varick v. Smith, 5 Paige, 137 ; Bloodgood v. Mohawk and Hudson R. R. Co., 18 Wend. 9 .) Fourth avenue was to be enlarged so as to be of a uniform width of 120 feet.

Talbot v. New York & Harlem Railroad

29 N.Y.S. 187 · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 1894

The section provided that the board should consist of Allan Campbell and Alfred W. … Bellinger v. Railroad Co., 23 N. Y. 42 ; Uline v. Railroad Co., 101 N. Y. 98 , 108, 4 N. E. 536 ; Conklin v. Railroad Co., 102 N. Y. 107, 112 , 6 N. E. 663 ; Bucholz v. Railroad Co., 66 Hun, 377 , 21 N. Y. Supp. 503 .

In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & Tinucci

36 Misc. 2d 872 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1962

indorsement, that “ Within 90 days or as soon as practicable the insured * * * shall give to MVAIC written notice of claim ’ ’ is interpreted to require only that a notice must be filed within a reasonable time (Matter of MV AIC v. … Brown, 15 A D 2d 578), the insured must use reasonable diligence to ascertain the insurance status of the other vehicle involved in the accident (Lauritano v. American Fid. Fire Ins.

Town of Orangetown v. Magee

156 Misc. 2d 881 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1992

Memphis Light, Gas & Water Div. v. Craft, 436 U.S. 1, 11-12 (1978); Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 573-574 (1975); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576-578 (1972).” (Logan v Zimmerman Brush Co., 455 US 422, 430 .) … Co. v Board of Stds. & Appeals, supra, at 566; Bayswater Health Related Facility v Karagheuzoff, supra, at 415.)

Weiser v. Grace

179 Misc. 2d 116 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1998

this lawsuit without any further reference to the Board. … Akers, former CEO and Chairman of the Board of IBM, and John J. Murphy, former CEO and Chairman of the Board of Dresser Industries, Inc.

Barker v. Town of Oswegatchie

16 N.Y.S. 727 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1891

In Bridge Co. v. Wagner, 10 N. Y. … court in Bridge Co. v.

Lincoln Guild Housing Corp. v. Housing & Development Administration

85 Misc. 2d 92 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1974

This is a motion by plaintiff for summary judgment and cross motion by defendants for summary judgment in this action based upon a January 4, 1965 resolution of the board of directors of plaintiff, a redevelopment housing … In fact, defendants are entitled to enforcement of the policy of sale of the shares of stock at par value (City of New York v Aguilar Gardens, NYLJ, June 22, 1966, p 14, col 6, affd 27 AD2d 802 ).

Sobel v. Bogen

21 Misc. 2d 664 · New York Supreme Court · May 27, 1959

The rule applicable here was succinctly stated in Matter of O’Brien v. Delaney ( 255 App. Div. 385, 387 , affd. 280 N. … Finnegan v. McBride, 226 N. Y. 252 ), it should not be disturbed by the court.”

Direct Media/DMI, Inc. v. Rubin

171 Misc. 2d 505 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1997

In January 1995, the corporation’s board of directors authorized the issuance of 526 of the treasury shares to key employees for $1 per share. … Respondent also seeks damages based on the alleged self-dealing of the board of directors, officers and employees of DMI.

Stern v. Delphi Internet Services Corp.

165 Misc. 2d 21 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1995

v High Socy. … (Velez v VV Publ. Corp., supra, 135 AD2d, at 49 .) Delphi’s bulletin board, like a letter-to-the-editor column of a newspaper, is a protected First Amendment activity.

Pavilion Nursing Home v. Litto

47 Misc. 2d 161 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1965

(Goodwins, Inc. v. Hagedorn, 303 N. Y. 300 [1951]; Plastic Calendering Corp. v. Spilberg, 121 N. Y. S. 2d 297 [1953]; Trading Port v. Robilotto, 8 Misc 2d 343 [1957].) … (San Diego Unions v. Garmon, 359 U. S. 236 ; Dooley v. Anton, 8 N Y 2d 91 [1960]; Incres S. S. Co. v. International Mar.

People ex rel. Reilly v. Andrews

35 N.Y.S. 311 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1895

Bolster v. French, 46 Hun, 232 , and People ex rel. Brady v. Martin, 145 N. Y. 253 , 39 N. E. 960 , we regard this question as settled adversely to the relator. … On the day that the petition was presented to the board, action was taken thereon, by which it was referred to the board of surgeons for report.

Vosbury v. Utica Daily Press Co.

105 Misc. 134 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1918

Bingham v. Gaynor, 203 N. Y. 27, 34, 35 ; Wachter v. Quencer, 29 id. 547. The following questions may be fairly asked: Is the article in question a general attack upon the plaintiff as an architect? … Odgers Lib. & Sland. 247; Newell Sland. & Lib. (2d ed.) 544; Storey v. Wallace, 60 Ill. 51 .

Alves v. City of New York

202 Misc. 427 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 29, 1952

The services consisted of setting up booths; tables and chairs for election board officials; barricades between election boards; maintaining the places in a clean and safe condition; supplying heat for the school buildings … (Barney v. Fuller, 133 N. Y. 605 .)” (Fox v. Arctic Placer Min. & Milling Co., 229 N. Y. 124, 128 .)

In re Lewis

51 Barb. 82 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1868

In Rhinelander v. The Mayor, &c. ( 24 How. Pr. 304 ,) this question was raised, and the justice expressed the opinion that the common council could not bind themselves not to assess for such repaving. … L. 1859, ch. 302) directs the duty of assessing to be done by the board of assessors for the time being.

Thompson v. Cohen

179 Misc. 70 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1942

The board of elections invalidated the petitions on the ground that the presence of the star on said petitions was in violation of law. … (Sexton v. Dillon, New York Law Journal, March 19, 1936, p. 1409; affd., 247 App. Div. 817 ; Howard v. Cotter, 242 App. Div. 727 .)

McDermott v. Nassau Electric Railroad

32 N.Y.S. 884 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1895

BROWN, P. J. … People v. Wilmerding, 136 N. Y. 363 , 32 N. E. 1099 .