Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.63s
Jenad, Inc. v. Village of Scarsdale
38 Misc. 2d 658 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1963
Justice Coyle in December 1960, in the case of Gulest Associates v. … Importing Corp. v. City of New York, 3 N Y 2d 418).
Cited 1 timesPublished158 Misc. 2d 985 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1993
Under Brown v City of New York ( 60 NY2d 897 [1983]), and its progeny, this question must be answered in the negative. … Subsequent to Brown (supra), two appellate courts of this State have determined that the holding in Brown applies in the context of Family Court child abuse proceedings and criminal proceedings (see, People v Roselle, 193
Cited 0 timesPublishedWilloughby Camera Stores, Inc. v. District No. 15, International Association of Machinists
205 Misc. 455 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1954
Plaintiff consented to an election to be supervised by the National Labor Relations Board. … There, the dispute was held to be about an “ unfair labor practice ” cognizable by the National Labor Relations Board (Garner v. Teamsters Union, 346 U.
Cited 3 timesPublished9 Misc. 2d 935 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1957
If so, she may apply to the Board of Zoning Appeals for relief by way of a use variance. … She cannot be barred from seeking such relief on the ground that any hardship suffered is self-imposed (Matter of Clark v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 301 N. Y. 86 ; O’Brien Transfer & Stor. Co. v.
Cited 3 timesPublished118 Misc. 641 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1922
Silcocks, the then president of the village and president of the police board. … Walton v. Hicks, 173 App. Div. 338 ; affd., 221 N. Y. 503 .
Cited 3 timesPublished14 Misc. 2d 80 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1957
Two days later, respondent instituted proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board charging petitioner.with unfair labor practices. … Div. 1009 ; Matter of Allen v. Dumont Lab. [Baker], 154 N. Y. S. 2d 394).
Cited 0 timesPublished14 Johns. 273 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1817
‘rrz¡ SZg' eoifíná there cited, $ See also Mos-tips v Fabrigas, Coivp, 179. Nightingale Bridges. Carth. 131. i Shower, 135. Hughes v. Cornelius, 2 Shorn. 232. T. Raym. 473 ~Sa~~nd. ^3 ¡jat¡R^ 55, liH‘ ] Rep. 482. … Chitiy's L. of ¿V. 302 3 DaNaf, 163. 4 Cranch, 514 .
Cited 14 timesPublishedStevens v. Central National Bank
24 Misc. 344 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1898
S. 247 ; Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Anderson, 149 id. 237; Sibbald v. … Mason v. Pewabic Co., 153 U. S. 361 ; Hinckley v. Morton, 103 id. 764; Nassau & Lowell Railroad Co. v. Boston & Lowell Railroad Co., 5 U. S. App. 97. This being so, should they be allowed?
Cited 2 timesPublished1 Cai. Cas. 123 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1803
Stat. 618, sec. 36; Keys v. Beardsley, 18 J. R. 135; 2 Wend. 241 ; 1 Id. 97; Jackson v. Brown, 1 Cai. R. 484 .
Cited 1 timesPublished178 Misc. 243 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1941
(Burke v. Kern, 287 N. Y. 203 .) … (See, also, Rathbone v. Wirth, 150 N. Y. 459; Bareham v. City of Rochester, 221 App. Div. 36 .)
Cited 1 timesPublishedJackson ex dem. People v. Wood
12 Johns. 242 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1815
And he, too, contradicted himself, first saying he had heard all the oxvners aeknoxvledge the mortgage, and afterwards admitting that he had never heard Brown make any such acknoxvledgment. … What is said by the court in Jackson v. Given, (8 Johns. Rep. 140.) is very much in point, that mere loose conversations will not warrant the inference of notice. And Lord Hardwicke, in Hine v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedMetropolitan Funeral Directors Ass'n v. Zebrowski
4 Misc. 2d 637 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1956
The defendants heavily rely upon the determination in People v. Gassman ( 295 N. Y. 254 ). But this court is of the opinion that the case of Goodwins Inc. v. Hagedorn ( 303 N. … Coercion of that kind is clearly unlawful (Dorchy v. Kansas, 272 U. S. 306, 311 ) and in our judgment can be enjoined by the courts of this state.
Cited 1 timesPublished58 Misc. 5 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1908
Atkin v. Kansas, 191 U. S. 207 ; Williams v. Eggleston, 170 id. 304 ; City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Works Co., 142 id. 79; Essex Public Road Board v. Skinkle, 140 id. 334. … Lucey v. Molloy, 35 App. Div. 136 ; affd. on opinion below, 161 N. Y. 621 .
Cited 4 timesPublished86 Misc. 72 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1914
McCabe v. Matthies, 179 N. Y. 242 ; Barber v. Town of New Scotland, 64 App. Div. 229 ; Bragg v. Town of Victor, 84 id. 83; People ex rel. Anderson v. Snedecker, 75 Misc. Rep. 194 ; Colby v. Town of Day, 75 App. … for audit, and the case of Kennedy v.
Cited 0 timesPublished163 Misc. 326 · New York Supreme Court · May 10, 1937
Home Cab Co., 141 Kans. 697 ; 42 P. [2d] 972 ; Birmingham Interurban Taxicab Service Corp. v. McLendon, 210 Ala. 525 ; 98 S. 578; Fletcher v. Bordelon, [Tex.] 56 S. W. [2d] 313; Dallas Taxicab Co. v. … (Shearer v. Public Service Commission, 99 Penn. Sup. Ct. 386; State v. LeFebvre, 174 Minn. 248 ; 219 N. W. 167 ; Lane v. Whitaker, 275 Fed. 476 .)
Cited 14 timesPublishedCity of New York v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
136 Misc. 569 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1930
(Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Los Angeles, 211 U. S. 265 ; St. Cloud Public Service Co. v. St. Cloud, 265 id. 352 ; Railroad Commission of California v. Los Angeles Railway Corp., 280 id. 145.) … Cloud Public Service Co. v. St. Cloud, supra; Railroad Commission of California v. Los Angeles Railway Corp., supra.)
Cited 4 timesPublished109 Misc. 2d 686 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1981
Application by petitioner John Van Lindt, as Chairman of the New York State Racing and Wagering Board (Board) for an order pursuant to CPLR 2308 (subd [b]) providing for the issuance of a warrant to commit the respondents … The difference between the two is clearly spelled out in Kastigar v United States ( 406 US 441 ).
Cited 4 timesPublished36 N.Y.S. 346 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1895
BROWN, P. J. This action was brought by the plaintiff, a judgment creditor of the defendant Richard W. … Dakin v. Hudson, 6 Cow. 221 ; Bowman v. Russ, Id. 234 ; Thomas v. Robinson, 3 Wend. 267 ; Cleveland v. Rogers, 6 Wend. 438 ; Turner v. Roby, 3 N. Y. 193 . The Code modified this rule, and it is now provided (Code Civ.
Cited 5 timesPublished24 Misc. 2d 592 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1960
As the court stated in People v. … (Matter of Coombs v. Edwards, 280 N. Y. 361 ; People v. Fielding, 158 N. Y. 542 ; Matter of Coleman v. Lee, 1 Misc 2d 685 , supra.)
Cited 18 timesPublished109 Misc. 552 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1919
The General Executive Board shall enforce this provision upon proof satisfactory of said offense of said Board, subject to appeal to the General Assembly.” … Swaine v. Miller, 72 Mo. App. 446 .
Cited 8 timesPublished
Ask Donna