Case law

People v. Brown

147 Misc. 2d 1047 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1990

(People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210 .) … People v Drain, 73 NY2d 107 .)

People v. Brown

145 Misc. 2d 724 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1989

Defendant’s reliance on People v Appel ( 141 AD2d 374 [1st Dept 1988]) and People v White (supra) is misplaced. … (People v Taylor, 65 NY2d 1 , 5 [1985].)

Brown v. J. P. Morgan & Co.

177 Misc. 626 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1941

(Sayer v. Wynkoop, supra, 59 .) … (Peckham v. Industrial Securities Co., 31 Del. 200 ; 113 A. 799 ; South Memphis Land Co. *637 v. McLean Hardwood Lumber Co., 179 Fed. 417, 420, 421 ; Brown v. Ehlinger, 90 Wash. 585 ; 156 P. 544 .)

Brown v. City of Elmira

29 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 316 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1880

Brown v. Butchers & Drovers' Bank

6 Hill & Den. 443 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1844

(Baker v. Dening, *444 8 Adol. & Ellis, 94; and see Harrison v. Harrison, 8 Ves. 186 ; Addy v. Grix, id. 504.) These cases fully sustain the ruling of the court below. … See Rogers v. Coit, (ante, p. 322, 3.)

Brown v. German American Insurance

12 N.Y. St. Rep. 877 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1887

Pelton v. Insurance Co., 77 N. Y , 605. The motion should, therefore, be denied, with ten dollars costs, Pratt, J., concurs.

Brown v. London Assurance Ass'n

48 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 639 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1886

Erie & Jersey Railroad v. Brown

57 Misc. 161 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1907

While it is true that it was held in Potter v.

Brown & Kimberly v. Neilson & Bunker

1 Cai. Cas. 525 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1804

Town of Taylor v. Brown

54 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 632 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1888

Town of Taylor v. Brown

42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 663 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1885

Jackson ex dem. Nicoll v. Brown

13 Wend. 437 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1835

In Long v. Blackall,7 T. … In the case of Chapman v.

Brown v. Melton

82 Misc. 2d 463 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1975

(See Matter of Lewitus v Tofany, 28 AD2d 1097 .)

Brown v. Clark

88 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 267 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1894

(Briggs v. Easterly, 62 Barb. 51 ; Bronson v. Dimock, 4 Hun, 614 .) … Bank v. Lamon, 130 N. Y. 366 .)

Brown v. Reid

121 Misc. 2d 777 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1983

Cooper v Smith, 115 Misc 2d 689, 690 ; see, also, Jacobson v Coughlin, 523 F Supp 1247, 1251-1255 .) … (Jacobson v Coughlin, supra, p 1251.)

Brown v. Pasternak

92 Misc. 2d 347 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1977

Inasmuch as cases such as Holodook v Spencer ( 43 AD2d 129 ) and Lastowski v Norge Coin-O-Matic ( 44 AD2d 127 ) hold that no such cause of action exists, the plaintiffs argue that the requested leave to amend must be denied … the court that the counterclaim seeks an apportionment of responsibility in negligence between those parties alleged to have been responsible for the damages to the infant plaintiff as envisioned in the decision of Dole v

Brown v. Lavine

78 Misc. 2d 1085 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1974

This is an article 78 proceeding brought by the petitioner, Maria Brown, for an order to annul and reverse the determination of respondent, Commissioner of New York State Department of Social Services, which upheld the failure … (Matter of Myerson v. Schechter, 25 Misc 2d 291 .)

Brown v. Minuse

41 Misc. 2d 427 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1963

Assn. v. New York State Thruway Auth., 5 N Y 2d 420, 424.) And this court must agree with the Court of Appeals when it stated, in Matter of New York Post Corp. v. … (Connolly v. O’Malley, 17 A D 2d 609.) The petition is denied.

Jackson ex dem. Antell v. Brown

3 Johns. 459 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1808

Y. v. 1. p. 542. L. N. Y. p. 285.

People v. Brown

110 Misc. 2d 1050 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1981

(People v Wheatman, 29 NY2d 337 , cert den sub nom. Marcus v New York, 409 US 1027 ; cf. People v Brown, 40 NY2d 183 .) … (People v Brown, 40 NY2d 183, 185-188 .) This statute is not a discovery device but rather is a deterrent to the abuse of the warrant process by requiring testimony under oath.