Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

0.33s

  • People v. Seda

    139 Misc. 2d 834 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1988

    (People v Brown 40 Cal 3d 512, 529, 726 P2d 516, 523 , revd on other grounds sub nom. California v Brown, 479 US 538 .) … (People v Harbold, supra, 124 Ill App 3d, at 381, 464 NE2d, at 748 ). In People v Brown (40 Cal 3d 512, 726 P2d 516 , supra) the defendant, once again through the testimony of Dr.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Crosby & Co. v. Compagnie Nationale Air France

    76 Misc. 2d 990 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1973

    Congress gave the responsibility for achieving this result to a single agency, the Civil Aeronautics Board, rather than to the numerous courts under diverse laws. (Lichten v. Eastern Air Lines, supra, p. 941.) … A claim that a tariff is unreasonable must first be passed upon by the board. (United States v. Western Pacific B. B. Co., 352 U. S. 59 ; Blair v. Delta Air Lines, 344 F. Supp. 360, 366-367 .)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • In re DeLong

    176 Misc. 919 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1941

    Before passing this resolution, however, the board of supervisors of the county of Oswego required indemnity against the cost of such increased pavement in the form of a resolution of the board of trustees of the village … The case of Matter of Lawrence v. Village of Mamaroneck ( 263 N. Y. 455 [1934]) is cited by both petitioners and the village as a background in aid of the solution of the instant question.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Stern v. Delphi Internet Services Corp.

    165 Misc. 2d 21 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1995

    v High Socy. … (Velez v VV Publ. Corp., supra, 135 AD2d, at 49 .) Delphi’s bulletin board, like a letter-to-the-editor column of a newspaper, is a protected First Amendment activity.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. Sammis

    25 Misc. 6 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1898

    Rep. p. 401; Stuber v. McEntee, 142 N. Y. p. 206). This form of denial, even when not a negative pregnant, is very troublesome to courts, and especially trial courts. … Pro. secs. 500, 507; Flack v. O’Brien, 19 Misc. Rep. 399 ; Green v. Brown, 22 Misc. Rep. 279 ; von Hagen v. Waterbury Mfg. Co. 22 Misc. Rep. 580 ). The motion to make more definite and certain is denied.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Goshen National Bank v. Bingham

    7 N.Y. St. Rep. 493 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1887

    It may, however, be proper to call attention to the decision of the court of appeals in the case of Cooke v. The State National Bank of Boston ( 52 N. … Freund v. The Importer’s and Trader’s Bank, 76 N. Y., 355 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Midland Insurance

    97 Misc. 2d 341 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1978

    The maturity of the debt occurs on the date of the forfeiture while the entry of judgment relates merely to the application of the remedy for the enforcement of the debt (People v Bennett, 136 NY 482, 487-488 ; People v Brown … Events subsequent to the day of appearance cannot retroactively cure the unexcused failure to appear (People v Stuyvesant Ins. Co., 24 AD2d 989, 990 , affd 21 NY2d 907 ; People v Brown, 96 Misc 2d 127 , supra).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Haag v. City of New York

    130 Misc. 124 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1926

    Devery v. Coler ( 173 N. Y. 103, 118 ). … Y. 511 ; Vose v. Cockcroft, 44 id. 415, 422; Anderson v. Reilly, 66 id. 189, 192.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Hertle

    54 Misc. 354 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1907

    The hoard of estimate and apportionment and the board of aldermen shall annually appropriate a sum sufficient to pay the salaries of said commissioners, and in the discretion of said board and the board of aldermen a sum … Armstrong v. Murphy, 65 App. Div. 126 . It is merely a part or incident of an administrative system devised by the Legislature for the efficient government of the municipality.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mandell v. Pasquaretto

    76 Misc. 2d 405 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1973

    Otherwise, a wrong is inflicted without any opportunity for legal recompense (Miller v. Edison Elec. Illuminating Co. of N. Y., 184 N. Y. 17 ; Rock v. Acker Process Co., 112 App. Div. 695 , affd. 188 N. Y. 604 ). … Mandell, $1,000, and by the Gobetzes, $500 (Gerow v. Village of Liberty, 106 App. Div. 357 ; cf. St. George’s Syrian Catholic Church v. Eisenstein Assoc., 34 A D 2d 947; Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co., 26 N Y 2d 219). O.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Scheinberg v. United Medical Service, Inc.

    42 Misc. 2d 125 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1964

    They cite cases holding that the same word or term may have different connotations, different meanings in different contexts (see Board v. Hearst Pubs., 322 U. S. 111 , 121-122 ; Towne v. Eisner, 245 U. … Co., 238 F. 2d 594 ; Drearr v. Connecticut Gen. Life Ins. Co., 119 So. 2d 149 [La. Ct. of App.]; cf. Theriot v. Schlumberger Well Surveying Cory., 131 So. 2d 94 [La. Ct. of App.]; Gordon v. Fidelity & Cas.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Municipal Art Society v. City of New York

    137 Misc. 2d 832 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1987

    In February 1987 both the Board of the TBTA and the Board of Estimate approved the project. … of zoned areas from encroachments of uses which devaluate living conditions” (Lavere v Board of Zoning Appeals, 39 AD2d 639 , ajfd 33 NY2d 873 ), with its goal being "to provide for the development of a balanced, cohesive

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Robertson v. New York State Division of Parole

    124 Misc. 2d 61 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1984

    Diamond v Flood ( 100 AD2d 604 ) stands for the proposition that all preliminary issues of fact should be resolved by a hearing officer and not by the court. … Levy v Dalsheim, 66 AD2d 872 , affd 48 NY2d 1019 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Davis Construction Corp. v. County of Suffolk

    112 Misc. 2d 652 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1982

    Corp. v Daitch Crystal Dairies, 13 AD2d 1026 ; Bartley v Walentas, 78 AD2d 310; Todd v Board of Educ., 272 App Div 618 , affd 297 NY 873 ). … Y. 313, 327 )” (Board of Educ. v Town of Greenburgh, 277 NY 193, 195 ; see, also, Frans Pets v Aggen, 111 Misc 2d 112 ; People v Santa Clara Lbr. Co., 55 Misc 507 ).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Bohlinger v. Rosenbaum

    6 Misc. 2d 235 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1955

    Div. 805 [1st dept., 1918]) and Fortgang v. Alpert ( 256 App. Div. 949 [2d dept., 1939]); (cf. Myers v. New York Cent. R. R. Co., 277 App. … J., June 10, 1955, p. 8, col. 5; D'Andrea v. Donovan, N. Y. L. J., July 29, 1955, p. 6, col. 7; Nutkowitz v. Brown, N. Y. L. J., April 21, 1955, p. 11. col. 8; cf. Malus v. Sperry Corp., 282 App.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Delaney

    180 Misc. 844 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1943

    Burby v. Howland, 155 N. Y. 270, 282 ; People v. Perretta, 253 N. Y. 305, 313 ; Matter of LaGuardia v. Smith, 288 N. Y. 1 , dissenting opinion by Lehman, Ch. … (Matter of Spector v. Allen, 281 N. Y. 251, 257, 258 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • O'Shea v. Martin

    34 Misc. 2d 987 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1962

    The test to be used in the application of subdivision 5-a of section 1296 was spelled out in Matter of Stolz v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of N. Y. (4 A D 2d 361, 364). … This test has been followed approAdngly in Matter of Leavitt v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of N. Y. (9 A D 2d 987) and in Matter of Payton v. New York City Tr. Auth. (8 A D 2d 602).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Fifty Mark Realty Corp. v. Herman

    24 Misc. 2d 609 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1959

    Corp. v. Weaver, 3 Misc 2d 356, 363 , affd. 2 A D 2d 678). … There is nothing in the record to show that the periods attributed for amortization are unfair (Matter of Philip-Toby Realties v. Weaver , 8 A D 2d 206) or contrary to standard accounting procedures.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Feist Realty Corp. v. Johanson

    33 Misc. 2d 376 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1962

    (See, also, Matter of Dengeles v. Young, 3 A D 2d 758; Matter of Harris v. Coffey, 14 Misc 2d 916 , 6 A D 2d 898.) … There is no provision either in the statute (Village Law, § 179-b) or in the local ordinance (Building Zone Ordinance, art. 12, § 4) for appeals to a Board of Appeals from a determination by the Board of Trustees, a legislative

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. Thompson

    163 Misc. 946 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 12, 1937

    (Matter of Brown, 153 Misc. 282 ; Rubin v. Myrub Realty Co., Inc., 244 App. Div. 541 .) … (Matter of Brown, supra.) It is the judgment of this court that the defendant widow,Mary J.

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.