Case law

Hardenburgh v. Crary

50 Barb. 32 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1858

(See Parsons v. Brown, 15 Barb. 590 .) And if we are to regard the decision of a co-ordinate branch of this court as of controlling authority—and such, with much reason, is urged to be the rule— (see Burt v.

Howard v. Howard

17 Barb. 663 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1854

By the Court, Brown, J. … (Jackson v. Waters, 12 John. 365 . Jackson v. Camp, 1 Cowen, 605.)

Crocker v. Crane

21 Wend. 211 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1839

Walker v. Devereaux, 4 Paige, 229 . And see The People ex rel. Case v. Collins, 19 Wendell, 56, 60 , &c. … Lond. ed. 346; Peck v. Woodbridge, 3 Day, 30 ; and note (c) to Doe, dem. Day v. Haddon, 3 Dougl. 312, 313.

In re Cohalan

71 Misc. 2d 196 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 28, 1972

(See, also, Phoenix v. Kolodziejski, 399 U. S. 204 ; Cipriano v. Houma, 395 U. S. 701 ; Landes v. Town of North Hempstead, 20 N Y 2d 417.) The court finds that these signatures are valid. … (Gates v. State of New York, 128 N. Y. 221 .)

Spliess v. Meyer

13 N.Y.S. 70 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1891

Hulse v. Hulse, 5 N.Y. Supp. 747 ; Brown v. Brown, Id. 893 ; Shannon v. Pickell, 2 N. Y. St. Rep. 160. … St. (6th Ed.) p. 586, §§ 20-27, do not appear to have been brought to the notice of the court in the case of Van Schuyver v. Mulford, 59 N. Y. 426 ; and that authority cannot, therefore, be followed as controlling.

Vulpis v. Department of Correction

154 Misc. 2d 625 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1992

On June 11, 1991, the Parole Board denied petitioner’s request for parole, and declared petitioner ineligible for parole for an additional 24 months. … In contrast, an inmate who had been denied parole would only be eligible one year before "his or her next scheduled appearance before the state parole board” (Correction Law § 851 [former (2)]; Matter of Confoy v New York

Federation v. Jarvis & Spitz, Inc.

35 Misc. 2d 414 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1962

S. 351 ; Reich v. Cochran, supra [ 151 N. Y. 122 ]) ”. (Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. Nieberg Realty Corp., 250 N. … (Minitzer v. Loeb, Rhoades & Co., 10 A D 2d 27, 30.) Applying the test heretofore referred to (Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v.

Busch Jewelry Co. v. United RetaIl Employees' Union, Local 830

170 Misc. 482 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1939

Inasmuch as the board of arbitrators decided not to hear the workers, the question remains open and must be determined. … (DeHart v. Hatch, [1875] 3 Hun, 375 : Matter of Stillwell, [1893] 139 N. Y. 337 ; People ex rel. Swift v. Luce, [1912] 204 id. 478 ; Busch Jewelry Co., Inc., v. United Retail, etc., Union, [1938] 168 Misc. 224 .)

Jackson ex dem. Brewster v. Bull

10 Johns. 19 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1813

The case of The Attorney-General v. … (Pells v. Brown, Cro. Jac. 599. 1 Salk. 299. Powell, J.)

Kountze v. Flannagan

19 N.Y.S. 33 · New York Supreme Court · May 13, 1892

This statement of the law is supported by many authorities. *36 See West v. Camden, 135 U. S. 507 , 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 838; Bliss v. Matteson, 45 N. Y. 22 ; Fuller v. Dame, 18 Pick. 472 ; Guernsey v. … Cook, 120 Mass. 501 ; Duncomb v. Railroad Co., 84 N. Y. 198 , (190;) Hoyle v. Railroad Co., 54 N. Y. 315 . It does not affect the matter that the alleged agreement has been performed' on the part of the plaintiff.

Richard's Service Station, Inc. v. Town of Huntington

79 Misc. 2d 834 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1974

A town board may not regulate traffic. (Wiggins v. Town of Somers, 4 N Y 2d 215, supra.) … Co. v. Du Mond, 309 N. Y. 537 , supra; Wiggins v. Somers, 4 N Y 2d 215, supra.)

Coles v. Carter

6 Cow. 691 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1827

In the cases of Gardner v. Buckbee, (3 Cowen, 120,) and Burt v. … Hazen, ( 10 John. 246 ,) and in Brown v. Wilde, ( 12 John. 455 .) These were all actions *693 on the case ; the two first on contract, the last for fraud.

Sorin v. Shahmoon Industries, Inc.

36 Misc. 2d 35 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1962

Y. 323, 327 ; Corr v. Hoffman, 256 N. Y. 254, 267-268 ; Miltenberg & Samton v. Falkingham, 273 App. Div. 631 ; Saleh v. Karp, 13 A D 2d 706, 707; cf., in unusual circumstances, People ex rel. Poivers v. … I am convinced that a demand upon the board of directors to sue Shahmoon for an accounting or reimbursement would have been entirely useless, and therefore such demand need not have been made (Sage v. Culver, 147 N.

Birnbaum v. Whalen

85 Misc. 2d 512 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1976

Respondents argue that their procedures, namely the "exit conference” coupled with review by the three-member rate review board, are sufficient to satisfy due process requirements. … (Vail v Quinlan, 406 F Supp 951 .)

Brooklyn El. Railroad v. Flynn

33 N.Y.S. 974 · New York Supreme Court · May 13, 1895

In the case of Newman v. Railway Co., 118 N. Y. 618 , 23 N. … E. 802 , where the opinion of Judge Brown is reviewed and approved. The case of Rich v. Railway Co. (Com. Pl. N. Y.) 19 N. Y.

Village of Fleischmanns v. Hyman

164 Misc. 175 · New York Supreme Court · May 8, 1937

(New Edgewood Lake Corporation v. Kingston Trust Co., 246 App. Div. 163 .) … Kieley v. Lent, 166 App. Div. 550 ; affd., 215 N. Y. 626 ; Mills v. Sweeney, 219 id. 213; Schieffelin v. Dolan, 204 App. Div. 351 ; Jewish Consumptives’ Relief Soc. v. Town of Woodbury, 230 id. 228; affd., 256 N.

Martin Realty Co. v. Bay View Heights Land Co.

107 Misc. 140 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1919

Goodell v. Harrington, 76 N. Y. 547 ; Matter of Fuller v. Brown, 35 Hun, 162 . … Matter of Fuller v. Brown, 35 Hun, 162 ; Hale v. Clauson, 60 N. Y. 339 ; Weeks v. Weeks, 106 id. 629.

In re McLean

3 N.Y.S. 45 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1888

Davidson v. New Orleans, 96 U. S. 97 ; Spencer v. Merchant, 125 U. S. 345, 355, 356 , 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 921. … Stuart v. Palmer, 74 N. Y. 183, 188 .

Moore v. Rector of St. Thomas'

4 Abb. N. Cas. 51 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1873

In the latter, a municipal charter provided for a joint meeting of the city council, composed of two separate boards, and made a majority of each board a quorum. … of both boards.

Bristol v. Dann

12 Wend. 142 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1834

In Whitaker v. Brown, 8 Wendell, 490 , where the suit was brought by the bearer of a promissory note, the admissions of the payee whilé owner of the note were excluded.