Case law

Melis v. Veritas Steamship Co.

23 Misc. 2d 45 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1960

Each of the orders of Judge Learned Hand and Judge Edelstein makes delivery of a waiver a condition of boarding. … (Canty v. Great Lakes Transit Corp., 2 F. R., D. 156 ; Mulligan v. Eastern S. S. Lines, Inc., 6 F. R. B. 601, 666;, Canter v. American Cyanimid Co.., 5 A D 2d 513.) 5.

Johnson v. Bloodgood

1 Johns. Cas. 51 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1799

The case of Brown v. Davis is not more applicable than that of Beck v. Robley. … Brown, 1 T. R. 168; 2 Caines’ R. 372, per Kent, J., depending upon the peculiar circumstances of the case. Such a note negotiable two years, Loomis v. Pulver, 9 Johns. R. 244; or eighteen months, Furman v.

People ex rel. Lehmann v. Craig

119 Misc. 536 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1922

The board of *538 estimate had no jurisdiction in the matter because a proper petition was not presented. Matter of Sharp, 56 N. Y. 257 ; Litchfield v. Vernon, 41 id. 123, 135; Miller v. … City of Amsterdam, 149 id. 288; Boyle v. City of Brooklyn, 71 id. 1; People ex rel. Hays v. City of Brooklyn, 71 id. 495; Jex v. Mayor, etc., of New York, 103 id. 536.

Prentice v. Decker

49 Barb. 21 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1867

(Brown v. Eastern R. R. Co., 11 Cush. 97 .) Applying these principles the recovery below was right. [Kings General Term, February 11, 1867. I.

Abrams v. Johnson

10 N.Y. St. Rep. 371 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1887

We have decided that question in the affirmative at the present term of this court, in the case of Abrams v. The Board of Town Auditors of Hempstead. … Upon reading the whole act, it seems reasonable that the board should require a yearly applicaion for a license, in order that the board may inquire and determine whether the applicant is qualified to receive a license under

In re Town of Brookhaven

78 Misc. 2d 499 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1974

Chamberlain v. Forrest, 96 N. Y. 544 ; Clark v. Norton, 49 N. Y. 243 ; Matter of Frances K. Powell, Inc. v. Board of Assessors, 53 Misc 2d 594 , affd. 30 A D 2d 639). … Bank v. Feitner, 191 N. Y. 88 ; People ex rel. Powell v. Supervisors of Nassau County, 54 Misc. 323 ; People ex rel. Brooklyn City R. R. Co. v. Board of Assessors of City of Brooklyn, 92 N.

Ford v. Mayor of New York

11 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 587 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1875

The lease was not, however, made for the sixth regiment, nor for any regiment in particular, but upon the opinion of the committee and the board that it would be wanted for some regiment. … Vide opinion in Fallon v. The Mayor, ante, p. 583.

Hoyt v. Sprague

61 Barb. 497 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 1, 1872

Allen v. Smith, (12 Com. B. R., N. S., 638,) relied on by the defendants, is certainly an authority in their favor, but I think it cannot be sustained, to its full extent. … It certainly is not in accordance with the rule laid down by the privy council in The Norway, (1 Browning & Lushrington, 409,) in which Allen v.

Sheils v. Flynn

163 Misc. 506 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1937

(People ex rel, Kelly v. Common Council, 77 N. Y. 503 ; People ex rel. Corscadden v. Howe, 177 id. 499; Nichols v. MacLean, 101 id. 526.) In People ex rel. Kelly v. … The Court of Appeals, in Kress v. Village of Watkins Glen ( 267 N.

Comstock v. City of Syracuse

5 N.Y.S. 874 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1889

People v. Dayton, 55 N. Y. 367 . … Rep, 648; People v. Kelly, 76 N. Y. 487 .

Nelson v. Mayor of New York

12 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 190 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1875

.: It is claimed that this case is governed by the case of Green v. The Mayor (decided by the Court of Appeals, March 23, 1875), the opinion in which, Rapallo, J., is now before me. … If this contention be well founded, this case comes within the decision of Green v. The Mayor, and must be disposed of accordingly.

Grac v. Town of Hempstead

9 Misc. 2d 935 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1957

If so, she may apply to the Board of Zoning Appeals for relief by way of a use variance. … She cannot be barred from seeking such relief on the ground that any hardship suffered is self-imposed (Matter of Clark v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 301 N. Y. 86 ; O’Brien Transfer & Stor. Co. v.

Royce v. Rosasco

159 Misc. 236 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1936

(Baldwin v. Seelig, 294 U. S. 511 ; 55 Sup. … The fact that the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, in the case of Rohrer v. Pennsylvania Milk Control Board (-Penn.

Atlantic Satellite Communications, Inc. v. Duffy

183 Misc. 2d 734 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 20, 2000

(See, United States v Western Pac. R. R. Co., 352 US 59 .) … Conference v United States, 342 US 570 .) New York State Supreme Court Justice Myriam J. Altman in Western Union Intl. v Western Union Tel.

Flood v. Kennedy

26 Misc. 2d 172 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1961

The following year, 1944, Matter of Galfapietra v. … The dissenting opinion *176 was based upon Matter of Natilson v.

Slepin v. Beck

84 Misc. 254 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1914

Cruikshank v. Goodwin, 20 N. Y. Supp. 757 ; Davis v. Solomon, 25 Misc. Rep. 695 ; Lusk v. Hastings, 1 Hill, 656 ; Moore v. Taylor, 40 Hun, 36 ; Commercial Bank v. Foltz, 13 App. Div. 603 . … Brown v. Nichols, 42 N. Y. 26 . His authority would, of course, be presumed in such a ease as in any other in which an attorney-at-law undertakes to appear for another.

In re Ganley

90 Misc. 445 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1915

Schieffelin v. Komfort, 212 N. Y. 531 ; Green v. Mills, 69 Fed. Rep. 852; Matter of Hines, 141 App. Div. 569 :. … Coffey v. Democratic Com., 164 N. Y. 336 ; People ex rel. Hahn v. Rep. Co. Com., 124 App. Div. 427 ; People v. Kings Co. Rep. Gen. Com., 63 id. 438 .

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Moore

197 Misc. 628 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1950

Board of Commissioners v. Banks (67 N. Y. 568); People ex rel. New York Elec. Lines Co. v. Squire ( 107 N. Y. 593 ), and People ex rel. Everson v. Lorillard ( 135 N. Y. 285 ). In Burke v. Kern ( 287 N. … In the case at bar, on the other hand, as in Curtin v. Barton ( 139 N. Y. 505 ), People ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Banks ( 67 N.

City of New York v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

136 Misc. 569 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1930

(Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Los Angeles, 211 U. S. 265 ; St. Cloud Public Service Co. v. St. Cloud, 265 id. 352 ; Railroad Commission of California v. Los Angeles Railway Corp., 280 id. 145.) … Cloud Public Service Co. v. St. Cloud, supra; Railroad Commission of California v. Los Angeles Railway Corp., supra.)

Johnson v. Boldman

24 Misc. 2d 592 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1960

As the court stated in People v. … (Matter of Coombs v. Edwards, 280 N. Y. 361 ; People v. Fielding, 158 N. Y. 542 ; Matter of Coleman v. Lee, 1 Misc 2d 685 , supra.)