Case law

Glassberg v. New York City Transit Authority

16 Misc. 2d 456 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1958

(Martin v. La Fonte, 53 N. Y. S. 2d, 415, 416.) … Div. 954 ; Goldenberg v. Zirinsky, 114 App. Div. 827 , cited with approval in Del Ra v. Vaughan, 2 A D 2d 156).

Fitzsimmons v. United States Fire Insurance

16 Misc. 2d 972 · New York Supreme Court · May 2, 1959

(Soper v. Fidelity & Cas. Co., 198 Misc. 1117 ; Hardware Mut. Cas. Co. v. Mason-Moore-Tracy, Inc., 96 F. Supp. 861 , affd. 194 F. 2d 173 .) … In Soper v. Fidelity & Cas.

Donohue v. Huie

173 Misc. 362 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1940

In Dunn v. Commissioner of Civil Service ( 281 Mass. 376, 380 ; 183 N. … Crawley, 50 F. (2d) 1010, 1011; Bannister v. Soldiers’ Bonus Board, 43 R. I. 346, 348.

Jackson ex dem. White v. White

8 Johns. 59 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1811

He devises not only his dwelling-house, but “ all the appurtenances and privileges thereunto belonging,” and designates the subject devised, as “ premises,” and which he “ improved as a boarding house.” … The case of Doe v. Collins (2 Term Rep. 498.) shows that stables and a coal pen will pass, in a devise, by the words house and garden, they having been used for the convenience of the house. In Nicholas v.

Armitage v. Fisher

26 N.Y.S. 364 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1893

In People v. Kilbourn, 68 N. … See Const. art. 10, § 3; People v. Mayor, etc., of New York, 5 Barb. 43 -47; People v. Fire Com’rs, 73 N. Y. 437 ; People v. Robb, 126 N. *369 Y. 180 , 27 N. E. 267 .

Perkins v. Whitney

12 N.Y.S. 184 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1890

Oil Works v. Brown, 38 How. Pr. 451 . Effect of Postponement. … Howard v. Freeman, 3 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 292; Miller v. Porter, 17 How. Pr. 526 ; Gregg v. Howe, 87 N. Y. Super. Ct. 420; Gallaudet v. Steinmetz, 6 Abb. N. C. 224 ; Oil Works v. Brown, 38 How. Pr. 451 .

In re Fergeson

126 Misc. 286 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1925

Feeny v. Board of Canvassers, 156 N. Y. 36 ; People ex rel. Pierce v. Parkhurst, 24 Misc. 442 .) … Feeny v. Board of Canvassers, supra; People ex rel. Pierce v. Parkhurst, supra.) The other five ballots, Exhibits 5, 7, 9, 10 and 14, should be counted for Fergeson.

Ahern v. Kings County

34 N.Y.S. 1023 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1895

The powers of a county as a body politic can only be exercised by the board of supervisors thereof, or in pursuance of a resolution by them. … Albrecht v. Queens Co. (Sup.) 32 N. Y. Supp. 473 . The statute of 1892, 1 which declares counties to be municipal corporations, has imposed no new liabilities upon the counties.

Hylan v. Finegan

105 Misc. 685 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1919

Board of Education v. Finley, 211 N. Y. 51 . … In Bullock v. Cooley, 183 App.

Dilluvio v. City of New York

73 Misc. 122 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1911

In Smith v. City of Rochester, 76 N. … In Hoggard v.

Freligh v. Directors of Saugerties

24 N.Y.S. 182 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1893

On May 14th the plaintiff, through his attorney, mailed a notice directed “to the Board of Directors of the Village of Saugerties, N. Y.” … Reining v. City of Buffalo, 102 N. Y. 308 , 6 N. E. Rep. 792; Curry v. City of Buffalo, 135 N. Y. 366 , 32 N. E. Rep. 80.

Kenwell v. Lee

142 Misc. 413 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 2, 1932

In Mead v. Turner ( 134 App. … Zerega v. Markvart ( 230 App.

People ex rel. Bleecker St. & F. F. R. v. Barker

35 N.Y.S. 803 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1895

People v. Pratt, 66 Hun, 578 , 21 N. Y. Supp. 853 , affirmed without opinion in 138 N. Y. 655 , 34 N. E. 513 , is in point and controlling upon the question presented on this appeal. … In view of that decision, it must be held that White v. Anthony, 23 N. Y. 164 , and Brown v. Leigh, 50 N. Y. 427 , do not apply.

Browning v. Sire

33 Misc. 503 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1900

Co. v. Whiston, 26 Abb. N. C. 358, 359 ; Fletcher v. Krupp, 35 App. Div. 588 ; Eidlitz v. Lancaster, 40 id. 446, 447. … Browning v. Stacey, 52 App. Div. 627 . Ten dollars costs on each motion to plaintiff, to abide the event. Motions granted, ten dollars costs on each motion to abide event.

People ex rel. Harper v. Roberts

52 Misc. 308 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1907

The Union, etc., v. Supervisors of Monroe County, 60 Hun, 320 ; 38 N. Y. St. Repr. 958. … But that decision was under the statute of 1886, which conferred power of appointment on the board of supervisors, and the attempted revocation was subsequent to an actual appointment by the board.

People ex rel. Lodes v. Department of Health

51 Misc. 190 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1906

Copcutt v. Board of Health, 140 N. Y. 1 ; People ex rel. Savage v. Board of Health, 33 Barb. 344 , cited with approval in People ex rel. Trustees, v. Board of Supervisors, 131 N. … Copcutt v. Board of Health, supra, 9.

Richardson v. Sharpe

29 Barb. 222 · New York Supreme Court · May 9, 1859

By the Court, Brown, J. … Lott, Emott and Brown, Justices.]

Briody v. Whalen

89 Misc. 2d 296 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1977

This appeal or protest was then reviewed by a Bate Review Board which is an internal board established within the Department of Health consisting of a Deputy Commissioner of the State Department of Health and two outside … The Rate Review Board affirmed the determination of the State auditor by letter dated July 30, 1976.

Burgess v. Tryde Manufacturing Co.

20 Misc. 2d 875 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1960

Under such circumstances the employee’s right to maintain a common-law action for assault is lost and the jurisdiction of the Workmen’s Compensation Board becomes exclusive (Meaney v. … Y. 660 ; Doca v. Federal Stevedoring Co., 305 N. Y. 648 ; Matter of Doca v. Federal Stevedoring Co., 308 N. Y. 44 ). The motion is granted.

Sprague v. Sprague

30 N.Y.S. 162 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1894

BROWN, P. J. This action is upon a promissory note made by the defendants’ intestate. The answer denied the making and delivery of the note, and any indebtedness thereon. . … Carnwright v. Gray, 127 N. Y. 92 , 27 N. E. 835 . As the answer did not plead that defense, the court was correct in its charge that there was no question of that kind in issue.