Case law

Smith v. Sullivan

38 Misc. 3d 727 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 11, 2012

(Matter of Mondello v Nassau County Bd. of Elections, 6 AD3d 18, 25 [2d Dept 2004] [emphasis added], quoting Matter of Scanlon v Savago, 160 AD2d 1162, 1163 [3d Dept 1990] [citations omitted].) … (Matter of Gross v Albany County Bd. of Elections, 10 AD3d 476, 479 [3d Dept 2004], affd 3 NY3d 251 [2004]; Matter of St. John v Board of Elections of County of Albany, 145 Misc 2d 324 [Sup Ct, Albany County 1989].)

Abrams v. New York City Transit Authority

78 Misc. 2d 938 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1974

(Accord Matter of Posner v. Rockefeller, 26 N Y 2d 970; see, also, Ridley v. Rockefeller, 28 N Y 2d 439.) … Since this is so, the petition is insufficient on its face (Matter of Silverberg v. Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 18, 60 Misc 2d 701, 702-703 ; Matter of Zara Contr. Co. v.

Park Inn Hotel, Inc. v. Messing

31 Misc. 2d 960 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 3, 1961

Simon, 7 A D 2d 740, affd. 6 N Y 2d 829; Dempsey v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 11 A D 2d 419; Matter of Klein v. Styl-Rite Optics, 8 A D 2d 811). … instance to that board (Dooley v.

Albany Preparatory Charter School v. City of Albany

10 Misc. 3d 870 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 30, 2005

Schools and churches are deemed to be uses beneficial to the public and zoning boards must make every effort to accommodate such uses (Cornell Univ. v Bagnardi, 68 NY2d 583 [1986]; Matter of Corporation of Presiding Bishop … of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Sts. v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town/Vil. of Harrison, 296 AD2d 460 [2002]).

Boorman v. City of New York

34 Misc. 3d 435 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 30, 2011

(Wilson v Galicia Contr. & Restoration Corp., 10 NY3d 827, 830 [2008].) … Brown, Inc.’s answer was affirmed on appeal. {Id. at 293, citing Cillo v Resjefal Corp., 300 AD2d 146 [1st Dept 2002].)

Nimbler v. Felber

111 Misc. 2d 867 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1981

McCollum v Board of Educ., 333 US 203, 212 ), and the First Amendment was intended to prevent “a union of government and religion [that] tends to destroy government and to degrade religion” (Engel v Vitale, 370 US 421, 431 … As the court said in Hayes v Board of Trustees of Holy Trinity Baptist Church of Amityville ( 225 NYS2d 316 , 320): “The office of pastor of a congregation is one of dignity, reverence and esteem.

Golowich v. Union Free School District No. 8

25 Misc. 2d 867 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1960

(See Goldrich v. Franklin Gardens Corp., 282 App. Div. 698 and cases cited. Also Sauchelli v. Fata, 306 N. Y. 123 ; Lynbrook Homes v. Frey, 217 App. Div. 164 ; Snyder v. County of Monroe, 2 Misc 2d 946 .) … Co. v. Wood, 145 Misc. 481 , and cases cited; City of Long Beach v. Long Beach Water Co., 209 App. Div. 902 .)

Foreman v. Foreman

7 Barb. 215 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1849

(Walter v. Maunde, 19 Ves. 424, 428, 429. Biddulph v. Biddulph, 12 Id. 161. Wheldale v. Partridge, 5 Id. 388. Thornton v. Hawley, 10 Id. 130. Lowes v. Hackward, 18 Id. 168, 171. Lingen v. Sowray, 1 P. Wms. 172. … Edwards v. Countess of Warwick, 2 Id. 171. 1 Ves. 204, notes 1, 2, 3. 1 Brown's Ch. Rep. 238.)

People ex rel. Luke v. Nuhn

92 Misc. 312 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1915

Terwilliger v. Chamberlain, 140 App. Div. 503 ; Browning, King & Co. v. Chamberlain, 150 id. 392 ; affd., 210 N. Y. 270 . Tbe moneys so deposited remained tbe property of tbe tenant. Browning, King & Co. v. … Stover v. Chasse, 9 Misc. Rep. 45, 48 ; Sheldon v. Testera, 21 id. 477; Flewellen v Lent, 91 App. Div. 430 .

Boyes v. Allen

59 Misc. 2d 975 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1968

(Matter of Board of Educ. v. Allen, 6 N Y 2d 127.) … It is felt that the same may be disposed of by reference to the case of Schreiner v.

Hubbell v. McCulloch

47 Barb. 287 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1866

These cases were all reviewed in the Court of Appeals, in Baldwin v. Brown, ( 16 N. Y. … As I understand the case of Baldwin v. Brown , it lays down the rule exactly the opposite of that of this case, at the circuit. I adopt Baldwin v. Brown , as I understand it, as conclusive of the case before us.

West v. Van Tuyl

1 N.Y.S. 718 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1888

The case of the Mayor v. Railroad Co., supra, is clearly distinguished by the court from that of Peck v. Valentine, 94 N Y. 569, cited by the appellant, and in which the same judge wrote the opinion. … It was received like the book in the case of the Mayor v. Railroad Co., not as a book of account, but as an original memoranda.

Saunders v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

23 N.Y.S. 927 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1893

The case of Duke of Buccleuch v. Board, L. R. 5 H. … Co. v.

Mannix v. Frost

100 Misc. 36 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1917

The city board of health has power to enact a sanitary ordinance having the force of law within the jurisdiction of the board. Polinsky v. People, 73 N. Y. 65 . … Schulz v. Hamilton, 97 Misc.

Findley Lake Property Owners, Inc. v. Town of Mina

31 Misc. 2d 356 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1956

(French v. Carhart, 1 N. Y. 96, 102 ; Clark v. Devoe, 124 N. Y. 120, 124 ).” (Loch Sheldrake Associates v. Evans, 306 N. Y. 297, 304-305 .) … (Commonwealth Water Co. v. Brunner, 175 App. Div. 153, 159 ; Nellis v. Countryman, 153 App. Div. 500 .) ” (Noble v. Echo Lake Tavern, 142 Misc. 427, 428 ; see, also, Tripp v. Richter, 158 App. Div. 136 .)

Budd v. Bingham

18 Barb. 494 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1854

Dewey v. … Brown, Dean and Rockwell, Justices.]

City of Syracuse v. Penny

59 Misc. 2d 818 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1969

In support of his position the defendant cites State v. Crawford ( 104 Kan. 141 ); Matter of Fink v. Cole ( 302 N. Y. 216 ); Matter of Lyons v. Prince ( 281 N. Y. 557 ). … In Matter of Lyons v.

Mattson v. Jarmag Realty Corp.

203 Misc. 375 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1952

Perhaps it would rather institute or defend proceedings before the Labor Relations Board. … (Maguire v. Ardea Realty Corp., 279 App. Div. 904 ) Settle order.

Posner v. Rockefeller

75 Misc. 2d 875 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1973

The rule was first enunciated in 1821 in Butler v. Kent (19 Johns, ch. 223, 226) and followed in Doolittle v. Supervisors of Broome County ( 18 N. Y. 155 ); Schieffelin v. Komfort ( 212 N. Y. 520 ) and Bull v. … Clair v. Yonkers Raceway (13 N Y 2d 72, supra) and matter of Donohue v.

Cleveland v. New Jersey Steamboat Co.

12 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 523 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1875

Y., 114 , approving Shipman, J., in Flint v. Norwich and N. Y. Trans. Co. ( 34 Conn., 554 .) In Bowen v. N. Y. Central R. R. Co. ( 18 N. … (Eaton v. Boston and Lowell R. R. Co., 11 Allen, 500 ; McElroy v. Nashua and L. R. R. Co., 4 Cush., 400 ; Pittsburgh, etc., R. R. Co. v. Hinds, 53 Penn., 512 .)