Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

1.44s

  • Simon v. Davenport Estates, Inc.

    205 Misc. 374 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1953

    (See Greenfield v. Liberty Constr. Corp., 81 N. Y. S. 2d 550; Kilbane v. Scarsdale Down Homes, N. Y. L. J., March 13, 1952, p. 1026, col. 4; Meyer v. Woodward-Brown Realty Co., 209 App. Div. 548 , affd. 239 N. … Y. 613 ; Price v. Woodward-Brown Realty Co., 190 N. Y. S. 561, 562, affd. 201 App. Div. 837 , and Brennan v. Schellhamer, 13 N. Y. S. 558.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Brown

    14 N.Y.S. 122 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1891

    Brown died at Albion, intestate, in March, 1889, leaving real and personal property in that village. In December of the same *123 year, George H. … Cary v. White, 59 N. Y. 336 ; Holcomb v. Holcomb, 95 N. Y. 316 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • L'Harmonie v. French

    19 Abb. N. Cas. 32 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1887

    Pomphret, 137 Mass. 564 , 566 ; Graff v. Evans, 8 Q. B. Div. 373, 377 ; Springhead Spinning Co. v. Riley, L. R. 6 Eq. Cas. 551, 558 ; People v. Canal Board, 55 N. Y. 390 , 393 ; Davis v. American Society, 75 N. … People v. Canal Board, 55 N.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Mayor of New York

    67 Barb. 223 · New York Supreme Court · May 3, 1875

    In this material respect the case differs from Collins v. The Mayor &c. ( 3 Hun, 680 .) … And as the servants of the board of aldermen or of its president might be appointed by any of the officers to whom the board saw fit to commit that duty, we must presume that the clerk had been duly authorized to make the

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Wade v. Strack

    3 Thomp. & Cook 165 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1874

    Jarvis v. Jarvis, 3 Edw. 462 ; Butler v. Palmer, 1 Hill, 324 ; Wadsworth v. Thomas, 7 Barb. 445 ; Johnson v. Burrell, 2 Hill, 238 ; Berly v. Rampacher, 5 Duer, 183 ; Ely v. Holton, 15 N. Y. 595 ; Wood v. … Oakley, 11 Paige, 400 ; McCloskey v. Cromwell, 11 N. Y. 603 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Arctic Fire Insurance v. Austin

    54 Barb. 559 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1869

    The case of Wells v. Steam Navigation Co. ( 2 N. Y. Rep. 208 , and 8 id. 381) decides this point, and I know of ho later decision to the contrary. … This has been so settled by the Court of Appeals in Milton v. Hudson River Steamboat Company, (4 Trans. Rep. 252.)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • People v. Herbert

    162 Misc. 817 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1937

    v. … Ct. 642 ; Associated Press v. National Labor Relations Board, -U. S. -; 57 S. Ct. 650 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.,-U. S.-; 57 S. Ct. 645 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Von Kohorn v. Morrell

    22 Misc. 2d 40 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1959

    In the recent case of Matter of Five Towns v. … Here the Zoning Board made specific findings with regard to each of the conditions and standards enumerated in the ordinance. The board *43 is not required to set. forth the evidence upon which its findings are based.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Clausen v. Murray

    16 Misc. 398 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1896

    Cairns v. Murray, 148 N. Y. 171, 173 ; People ex rel. Gentilesco v. Excise Board, 7 Misc. Rep. 415, 417 . … Cairns v. Murray, 148 N. Y. 175, 176 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. McIntyre v. Buttling

    31 N.Y.S. 1132 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1894

    Order affirmed on the opinion of Justice Cullen in the case of Peonle v. Jeremiah J. Cronin. Brown, P. J., not sitting.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marasse v. Buchmueller

    35 Misc. 2d 643 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1962

    (Finley v. Spaulding, 274 App. Div. 522 ; Matter of Pacos v. Hunter, 29 Misc 2d 404 , affd. 14 A D 2d 990; Markert v. Wilson, 284 App. Div. 1086 ; Johnson v. Parsons, 207 Misc. 107 , affd. 285 App. Div. 601 .) … (Thompson-Starrett Co. v. City of New York, 5 Misc 2d 576 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dobson Jamaica Realties, Inc. v. Town of Brookhaven

    96 Misc. 2d 722 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1978

    The court in directing a hearing recognized that, in the first instance at least, the town board should have the right to legislate the appropriate zoning (Woodbury Props. v Burk, 44 AD2d 728 ). … (Jurgens v Town of Huntington, 53 AD2d 661 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Luna Park Housing Corp. v. Peskin

    65 Misc. 2d 600 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1971

    In the case of Mounting & Finishing Co. v. McGoldrick ( 294 N. … v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brisbane v. Pratt

    4 Denio 63 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1847

    This view of the question was taken by the court for the correction of errors, in the case of Paige v. Cagwin, (7 Hill, 361 .) (See also Cowen & Hill’s Notes, p. 668; Spargo v. Brown, 9 Barn. & Cress. 935; Beauchamp v. … (Duckham v. Wallis, 5 Esp. Rep. 251; De La Chaumette v. The Bank of England, 9 Barn. & Cress. 208; Cowen & Hill’s Notes, 475.) I think the judge erred in excluding the evidence, and that a new trial should be granted.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Dorme v. Slingerland

    12 Misc. 3d 815 · New York Supreme Court · May 1, 2006

    of Educ., Commack Union Free School Dist. v Ambach, 70 NY2d 501, 508 [1987], cert denied sub nom. … Margolin v Board of Educ., 485 US 1034 [1988]). While an employee may proceed outside the grievance procedure when the agreement expressly so provides (see Tomlinson v Board of Educ. of Lakeland Cent.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Dot Mort Holding Corp. v. Town of Mamaroneck

    6 Misc. 2d 709 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1957

    (James v. Sammis, 132 N. Y. 239, 247 .) The resolution of the town board is based upon the user which it found to be sufficient and the only apparent issue is as to the sufficiency of the user. … The dedication is by statutory declaration and the resolution of the town board is not an essential part of the dedication pursuant to section 189 of the Highway Law. (People ex rel. Minard v. Donovan, 228 App.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sealey v. American Society of Hypertension, Inc.

    10 Misc. 3d 572 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 2, 2005

    The new bylaws do not include the chair of the CME Committee on the list of ex officio board members, thus ending Alderman’s position on the board. … (See, e.g., Blanc v Windham Mtn.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Danihee v. Hyatt

    12 N.Y.S. 465 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1891

    the board fence was.” … Edwards v. Noyes, 65 N. Y. 125 . Possession acquired by this survey did not vest in the plaintiff a right of action. Stuyvesant v. Tompkins, 9 Johns. 61 ; Jackson v. Hazen, 2 Johns. 22 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McCrea v. Chahoon

    8 N.Y.S. 88 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1889

    St. p. 367, § 4. 1 The prior audit by the board of town auditors is conclusive, and cannot be reviewed or reversed by the board of supervisors. Osterhoudt v. Rigney, 98 N. Y. 222, 234 . … Osterhoudt v. Board, 98 N. Y. 239 ; Latham v. Richards, 15 Hun, 129 ; Mahler v. Schmidt, 43 Hun, 512 ; Weeks v. Cornwall, 39 Hun, 643 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mannix v. Frost

    100 Misc. 36 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1917

    The city board of health has power to enact a sanitary ordinance having the force of law within the jurisdiction of the board. Polinsky v. People, 73 N. Y. 65 . … Schulz v. Hamilton, 97 Misc.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.