Case law

Serrano v. Cuttita

147 Misc. 2d 1 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1990

v Board of Elections, 65 NY2d 959 ). … , 630 F2d 890, 898 [2d Cir 1980]; cf., Jefferson v Abrams, 747 F2d 94, 96; see, Montano v Lefkowitz, 575 F2d, supra, at 387, n 17).

In re the Accounting of United States Trust Co.

29 Misc. 2d 314 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1961

The general rule in New York has been that a direction to distribute among “issue” or “lawful issue” raises a presumption in favor of a per capita distribution (Soper v. Brown, 136 N. Y. 244 ; Schmidt v. Jewett, 195 N. … Y. 424 ; Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Brown , 30 N. Y. S. 2d 85). After-born beneficiaries are bound by such agreements in the same manner as parties in being at the time of settlement (Matter of Balfe, 49 N. Y.

MacIntyre v. Fruchter

148 N.Y.S. 786 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1914

Nealon v. Frisbie, 11 Misc. Rep. 12 , 31 N. Y. Supp. 856 ; Phillipe v. Baldwin, 8 Wkly. Dig. 194 ; Schurick v. … In the case of Kenworthy v. Brown, 45 Misc. Rep. 292 , 92 N. Y. Supp. 34 , the language was: “You are only a low woman. You are a half negress.”

Homier Distributing Co. v. City of Albany

163 Misc. 2d 723 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1995

(Brown-Foreman Distillers Corp. v New York State Liq. … Bruce Church, Inc., supra, 397 US, at 142 ; see also, Brown-Foreman Distillers Corp. v New York State Liq.

Menechino v. Division of Parole

57 Misc. 2d 865 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 27, 1968

Combs v. … Citing People v.

Grace v. Wilson

199 Misc. 738 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1950

The trustees of this common school district constituted a board for such district and such board is a body corporate *744 (Education Law, § 1601.) … In Sweeney v. City of New York ( 225 N. Y. 271, 275 ), it was said: “ The verb ‘ to file ’ may be used in various senses.

Blyn v. Bartlett

84 Misc. 2d 394 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1975

The Administrative Board, like any administrative agency, must adhere to both procedures mandated by law as well as to its own rules (Matter of English v McCoy, 51 Misc 2d 311 , mod sub nom Matter of Conlon v McCoy on other … Matter of McCoy v Mayor of City of N. Y.

People ex rel. Argus Co. v. Hugo

101 Misc. 481 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1917

The writ has heretofore been used for the very purpose of reviewing the determination of the state printing board under law not differing in substance from the present. People ex rel. Lyon Co. v. McDonough, 173 N. … Graves v. Sohmer, 207 N. Y. 455 .

McChesney v. City of Syracuse

22 N.Y.S. 507 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1892

It is urged that Crabtree, in completing the contract, did not intend to act as agent of the board of education and the city, and did not so act, for the reason—First, that the board of education did not employ him by any … Van Clief v. Van Vechten, 130 N.Y. 571 , 29 N. E. Rep. 1017. And this is the rule where the surety of the defaulting contractor, with the consent of the city, performs it. City of St. Louis v. Lumber Co., 42 Mo.

Xerox Corp. v. Sanger

79 Misc. 2d 480 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 27, 1974

In Matter of Magee v. … In Rapone v.

Conway v. Sahm

202 Misc. 519 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1952

There are many parallels and close analogies in the case of Matter of Block v. Sprague and in the case at bar. … In Matter of Block v.

In re McLean

6 N.Y.S. 230 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1889

Bank v. Supervisors, 25 N. Y. 312, 315 ; Baldwin v. City of Buffalo, 35 N. Y. 375, 380 ; People v. Bank, 39 Hun, 525 . … Railroad Co. v. Supervisors, 48 N. Y. 93 ; Mayor, etc., v. Davenport, 92 N. Y. 604, 610, 611 ; McLean v. Jephson, 41 Hun, 479 ; Re McMahon, 67 How. Pr. 113 ; Smyth v. Assurance Co., 35 How. Pr. 126 .

Clark v. Pattern Analysis & Recognition Corp.

87 Misc. 2d 385 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1976

(Graves v Lombardi, 42 AD2d 700 ; Damon Creations v James Talcott, Inc., 39 AD2d 677 ; Smith v Robilotto, 25 AD2d 454 .) *386 There is no question that the proposed recapitalization of the corporation would cause irreparable … In Green v Santa Fe Ind.

Broome County v. New York State Civil Service Commission

73 Misc. 2d 408 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1973

Matter of Neff v. … The latter statute provides for his appointment by the Board of Supervisors, which shall determine his salary.

Kheel v. Ravitch

115 Misc. 2d 602 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1982

board members who voted on that issue, and information about how they voted. … (See Matter of Westchester Rockland Newspapers v Kimball, supra; Matter of Fink v Lefkowitz, 47 NY2d 567, 571 .)

Sheldon v. Barney

71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 633 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1892

(See Gillespie v. Brown et al., 16 Nebraska Rep., 457.)

Fisk v. Wilber

7 Barb. 395 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1849

(Olmsted v. Loomis, 6 Barb. S. C. R. 152.) … Brown, for the mills set off to him, it is not necessary to say much.

Saunders v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

23 N.Y.S. 927 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1893

The case of Duke of Buccleuch v. Board, L. R. 5 H. … Co. v.

Helfer v. Amos

159 Misc. 2d 65 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1993

(Matter of Godzisz v Mohr, 197 AD2d 839 .) … (Matter of Ruiz v Sachs, 43 NY2d 894 [1978].) The acceptance form used substantially complies with the requirements of section 6-146. The Board incorrectly invalidated his petitions based upon the acceptance.

People ex rel. Arnold v. Allen

30 Misc. 2d 1031 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 22, 1961

It is settled law, too, that the determination of the Parole Board not to grant parole is not reviewable by habeas corpus (Correction Law, § 212; People ex rel. Gariti v. Brophy, 255 App. Div. 823 ). … Rep. 981; Commonwealth v. Superintendent, 220 Penn. St. 401; Edmunds v. Griffin, 177 Iowa, 389 ).” (People ex rel. Higley v. Millspaw, 281 N. Y. 441, 445 .) In People ex rel. Coine v. Reilly ( 228 App.