Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.76s
15 Johns. 159 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1818
These are principles fully established. by the cases of Thornton v. Dixon, (3 Brown’s Ch. Rep. 199.) and Balmain v. Shore. (9 Ves. jun. 500.)
Cited 30 timesPublished55 Misc. 3d 382 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 13, 2016
, 116 AD3d 1113 , 1113-1114 [3d Dept 2014]; see Matter of Sullivan v Board of Zoning Appeals of City of Albany, 144 AD3d 1480, 1482-1483 [3d Dept 2016]; Matter of Lavender, 141 AD3d at 972 ). … In Group House of Port Washington v Board of Zoning & Appeals of Town of N.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBuilding a Better New York Committee v. New York State Commission on Government Integrity
138 Misc. 2d 829 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1988
By correspondence dated January 29, 1988, this court determined that both the New York State Commission on Government Integrity (Commission) and the New York State Board of Elections (State Board) were in default in the underlying … It remains subject to traditional standards applicable to subpoenas and motions to quash (cf., Matter of New York State Dept. of Taxation v New York State Dept. of Law, 58 AD2d 298 ). The petition shall be dismissed.
Cited 2 timesPublishedArctic Fire Insurance v. Austin
10 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 195 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874
In Brown v. … In Webster v.
Cited 0 timesPublished146 Misc. 240 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1933
The action is one by the Superintendent of Banks pursuant to section 81 of the Banking Law and sections 60 and 61 of the General Corporation Law against various members of the board of directors of the Bank of United States … (See, also, Brennan v. Barnes, 133 Misc. 340 ; Baker v. Baker, 122 id. 757; Wilson v. Brown, 107 id. 167; affd., 190 App. Div. 926 ; Van Schaick v. Alpert, N. Y. L. J. Mar. 16, 1932, per Mr.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBobandal Realties Inc. v. Worthington
39 Misc. 2d 756 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1963
Petitioner is not required first to apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a variance. The Zoning Board of Appeals has no power to hear or determine a question affecting the constitutionality of the Zoning Ordinance. … ordinance (Shepherd v.
Cited 2 timesPublished6 Misc. 3d 158 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 14, 2004
of Elections; and the Albany County Board of Elections. … Matter of Koppell v Garcia, supra; Matter of Swarts v Mahoney, supra).
Cited 1 timesPublished1 Liquor Tax Rep. 118 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1897
I agree with the reasoning in “Brown v. Hilton, 40 Mass. R. 319” and “Cobb v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGreene v. Teachers' Retirement System
107 Misc. 2d 508 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1980
(NY Const, art V, § 7; Matter of Ayman v Teachers’ Retirement Bd. of City of N. Y., 9 NY2d 119 ; Kleinfeldt v New York City Employees’ Retirement System, 36 NY2d 95 .) … (Matter of Pierne v Valentine, 291 NY 333 ; Matter of Rogalin v New York City Teachers’ Retirement Bd., 290 NY 664 ; Matter of Murray v Teachers’ Retirement Bd. of City of N.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSchout v. Conkey Avenue Saving, Aid & Loan Ass'n
11 Misc. 454 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1895
Knowlton v. Congress & Empire Spring Co., 57 N. Y. 518 -537; Knox v. Baldwin, 80 id. 612 ; Robinson v. Smith, 3 Paige, 222 ; Hyatt v. Clarke,. 118 N. Y. 567 ; Adams v. Mills, 60 id. 538; Lindner v. … Sahler, 51 Barb. 323 ; Briggs v. Easterly, 62 id. 51; Bronson v. Dimock, 4 Hun, 614 .
Cited 1 timesPublished152 Misc. 568 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 4, 1934
Law, § 29; Travelers Insurance Co. v. Brass Goods Mfg. Co., 239 N. Y. 273 ; Miller v. New York Railways Co.. 171 App. Div. 316 ; Godfrey v. Brooklyn Edison Co., 115 Misc. 21 ; affd., 196 App. Div. 980 .) … (Hanke v. New York Consolidated R. R. Co., 181 App. Div. 53 ; Sabatino v. Crimmins Contracting Co., 102 Misc. 172 ; affd., 186 App. Div. 891 ; O’Brien v. Lodi, 246 N. Y. 46 .)
Cited 8 timesPublished131 Misc. 736 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1927
This the board of estimate and apportionment has done. … In Talcott v. City of Buffalo ( 125 N.
Cited 3 timesPublished70 Misc. 603 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1911
Haas the unanimous verdict of the board of directors that the board of governors and the ’club think too much of Mr. … Chandler v. Hoag, 2 Hun, 613 ; affd., 63 N. Y. 624 ; Smith v. Danzig, 64 How. Pr. 320 ; Wilson v. Brentwood Hotel Co., 16 Misc. Rep. 48 ; Noble v. Euler, 20 App. Div. 548, 552 ; International Bank of St. Louis v.
Cited 7 timesPublished47 Barb. 287 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1866
These cases were all reviewed in the Court of Appeals, in Baldwin v. Brown, ( 16 N. Y. … As I understand the case of Baldwin v. Brown , it lays down the rule exactly the opposite of that of this case, at the circuit. I adopt Baldwin v. Brown , as I understand it, as conclusive of the case before us.
Cited 5 timesPublished18 Misc. 2d 192 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1959
(Matter of Fletcher, 166 Misc 486 ; Stewart v. Franchetti, 167 App. Div. 541 ; Matter of Scott, 1 Misc 2d 206 .) … (Board of Educ. of Hempstead v. French, 8 Misc 2d 208 ; Matter of Breckwoldt, 176 Misc. 549 ; Matter of Everson, 268 App. Div. 425 ; Matter of Byrne, 71 N. Y. S. 2d 359.)
Cited 2 timesPublished9 Misc. 3d 1083 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 23, 2005
Gold, 172 AD2d 982, 984 [1991]; Brainard v Brown, 91 AD2d 287 [1983]). … Plan of Greater N.Y., 7 NY2d 931, 932 [1960]; Coopersmith v Gold, supra at 984; LaBrake v Enzien, 167 AD2d 709 [1990]; Brainard v Brown, supra).
Cited 3 timesPublished4 N.Y.S. 245 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1889
That the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure relating to the examination of parties before trial authorize a plaintiff to examine a defendant for this purpose was established by the decision in Glenney v. … Brown, ” as trustee of the plaintiff, upon certain leasehold premises, Ho. 131 William street, in the city of Hew York.
Cited 6 timesPublished4 How. Pr. 48 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1849
In Hough v. … (Leonard v. Vredenburgh, 8 John. 29 ; Hmt v. Brown, 5 Hill, 145 ; Leggett v. Brown, 6 Hill, 639 ; Hall v. Newcomb, 7 Hill, 416 ; Curtis v. Brown , 2 Barb. S. C. Rep. 51; Coddington v. Davis, 1 Comst. 186; Haywood v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedTrustees of Columbia University v. Herzog
181 Misc. 903 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1943
S. 2d 650, 653; see Triboro Coach Corp. v. Labor Relations Board, 22 N. Y. S. 2d 1013, 1017-1018, affd. 261 App. Div. 636 , affd. 286 N. Y. 314 ). … (See White v. Boland, 254 App. Div. 356 .) Motion to enforce determination of State Labor Relations Board is granted; motion to set aside its determination denied.
Cited 3 timesPublished184 Misc. 794 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1945
Jur., Animals, §§ 7, 31; Fox v. Mohawk & H. R. Humane Society, 165 N. Y. 517, 522 ; Nicchia v. New York, 254 U. S. 228 .) … Beck v. Graves ( 280 N. Y. 405, 410 ) quoting from *802 Stuart v. Palmer ( 74 N.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna