Case law

Robinson v. Robinson

176 Misc. 2d 952 · New York Supreme Court · May 13, 1998

(See, Haydock v Haydock, 237 AD2d 748 ; Matter of Talandis v Talandis, 233 AD2d 689 ; Soba v Soba, supra; Wells v Wells, 130 AD2d 487 ; Busetti v Busetti, supra.) … Plaintiff’s further reliance on the court’s finding of an “implicit agreement” in Brown v Brown ( 226 AD2d 1010 ), citing to Slagsvol v Schneck ( 213 AD2d 537 ), is also misplaced.

Village of Herkimer v. Potter

124 Misc. 57 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1924

Lieberman v. Vandecarr, 175 N. Y. 440, 444 ; affd., 199 U. S. 552 ; Polinsky v. People, 73 N. Y. 65 ; People ex rel. Schulz v. Hamilton, 188 App. Div. 783 ; Mannix v. Frost, 100 Misc. 36, 45 ; affd., 181 App. … Any reasonable condition may be imposed by the local health board as a condition precedent to the issuing of the permit. (People ex rel. Shelter v. Owen, 66 Misc. 24 .)

Knights of Columbus v. Weaver

121 Misc. 2d 914 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1983

Additionally, petitioners have alleged generally acceptable grounds for challenging the propriety of a decision by a zoning board of appeals, namely, property depreciation and traffic congestion (e.g., Daly v Eagan, 77 Misc … 2d 279 ; Matter of Mueller v Anderson, 60 Misc 2d 568 ).

Velders v. Gaines

112 Misc. 226 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1920

Since the decision in the case of Simonson v. Waller, 9 App. Div. 503 , which was followed in Brown v. Richter, 25 id. 239, and approved, in part, by the Court of Appeals in Doane v. Mercantile Trust Co., 160 N. … It is interesting to note that in a later and similar case (Brown v.

Bank of New York Co. v. Irving Bank Corp.

140 Misc. 2d 508 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1988

In Matter of Cromarty v Leonard ( 13 AD2d 275 , affd 10 NY2d 915 [1961]), the vote of a majority of the total membership of the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors was necessary to approve the nominee for County Attorney. … , 1 abstaining, 1 seat vacant, held not to constitute required two-thirds vote of board (i.e., 4 votes), citing Matter of Cromarty v Leonard, supra, for the proposition that the abstention should be counted in opposition

In re Merkel, Inc. Monarch Marking System Co.

45 Misc. 2d 753 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1965

Browning, 210 N. Y. 10 ). … Browning, supra; Gardner v. Town of Cameron, 155 App. Div. 750 , affd. 215 N. Y. 682 ; Ohl & Co. v. Standard Steel Sections, Inc., 179 App. Div. 637 ; Equitable General Providing Co. v. Eisentrager, 34 Misc. 179 ).”

Cudney v. Spaulding

191 Misc. 979 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1948

(James v. Alderton Dock Yards, 256 N. Y. 298, 305 .) This court is mindful of the decision in Neubeck v. McDonald ( 128 Misc. 768 ) and Baumann v. Baumann ( 222 App. … In 79 Delancey Corp. v. Meridan Holding Corp.

People ex rel. Osborne v. County Canvassers of Dutchess County

20 N.Y.S. 329 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1892

This respondent, however, was not a party to the agreement, but the clerk of the board of canvassers. … The whole scheme of the statute was declared by the court of appeals, in People v. State Board of Canvassers, 29 N. E. Rep. 355, intended to secure before the state canvassers the physical presence of the returns.

Broderick v. Marcus

146 Misc. 240 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1933

The action is one by the Superintendent of Banks pursuant to section 81 of the Banking Law and sections 60 and 61 of the General Corporation Law against various members of the board of directors of the Bank of United States … (See, also, Brennan v. Barnes, 133 Misc. 340 ; Baker v. Baker, 122 id. 757; Wilson v. Brown, 107 id. 167; affd., 190 App. Div. 926 ; Van Schaick v. Alpert, N. Y. L. J. Mar. 16, 1932, per Mr.

People ex rel. McConville v. Hills

1 Lans. 202 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1869

(Commonwealth v. Dearborn, 15 Mass. 125 ; The King v. … It is, that each member of the board of directors shall have a direct pecuniary interest in the welfare of the road. Under the act of 1867, the city may chose a majority of the board.

Sullivan v. City of Syracuse

29 N.Y.S. 105 · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 1894

Galvin v. Mayor, 112 N. Y. 223 , 19 N. E. 675 ; Chisholm v. State (N. Y. App.) 36 N. E. 185 . … Gibbons v. Village of Phoenix (Sup.) 15 N. Y. Supp. 410 ; Goff v. Village of Little Falls (Sup.) 20 N. Y. Supp. 175 ; Sherman v. Village of Oneonta (Sup.) 21 N. Y. Supp. 137 . 3.

Kaufman v. City of New York

30 Misc. 2d 285 · New York Supreme Court · May 2, 1961

As the court said in the oft-cited case of Ohman v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. ( 300 N. … Mention should perhaps be made at this point of this court’s decision in Brooks v. Board of Educ. of City of N.

Purdy v. Huntington

46 Barb. 389 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1866

The opinion of the referee is based upon the cases of Brown v. Blydenburgh, ( 7 N. Y. Rep. 141 ,) and Kellogg v. Smith, (26 id. 18.) … In Brown v.

Wolf v. Wolf

109 Misc. 366 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1919

See, also, Kaufman v. Kaufman, 177 App. Div. 162, 165 ; Brown v. Brown, 153 id. 645; Berry v. Berry, 130 id. 53; Taylor v. Taylor, 63 id. 231, 234; affd., 173 N. Y. 266 ; Tiedemann v. Tiedemann, 94 Misc. … Rep. 449 ; McCarron v. McCarron, 26 id. 158, Tait v. Tait, 3 id. 218; Kerrison v. Kerrison, 8 Abb. N. C. 444 .

Miller v. Power

208 Misc. 728 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1955

In Matter of Phipps v. Power ( 206 Misc. 983 ), Mr. Justice Matthew M. … (Also, see, Corn v. Cohen, 49 N. Y. S. 2d 913, and Matter of Larson, N. Y. L. J., Oct. 10, 1949, p. 786, col. 5.)

Cowles v. Kiehel

65 N.Y.S. 349 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1899

The case here as to the purchase by the defendant Kiehel of the defendant Browne of the five shares of stock of the Rochester Folding-Box Company, and the credit given therefor on account of indebtedness of Browne to Kiehel … In McNeil v. Bank, 46 N.

Bergen v. Mayor of New York

12 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 243 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1875

court to the Fourth District Police Court at a meeting of the board held on that day. … as a court, he would become one of its necessary attendants, and that seeifis to have been the view entertained of the employment by Judge Folgeb, who delivered the opinion of the Court of Appeals in the case of Sullivan v.

People v. Duffy

28 Misc. 3d 718 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 2, 2010

(People v Ford, 86 NY2d at 403 .) … (Padilla v Kentucky, 559 US —, 130 S Ct 1473 [2010]; People v Ford, supra.)

McMartin v. Taylor

2 Barb. 356 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1848

The reporter however adds, on the authority of some of the English cases, and Bates v. Conklin, ( 10 Wend. 389, 392 .) and per Thompson, J., in Brown v. Howard, ( 14 John. … In *359 Brown v.

Hayes v. Relyea

43 Misc. 2d 295 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1962

Andrew V. Clements, Ref. … (Alexion v. Hollingsworth, 289 N. Y. 91 ; Polin v. Kaplan, 257 N. Y. 277 ; Overton-Bey v. Jacobs, 25 CCH Labor Cases, par. 68,357, [Supreme Ct., Special Term].)