Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.82s
82 Misc. 300 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1913
Brown. The deed from Samuel A. Brown to his grantee describes the premises as above, “ to Green street as now opened and worked.” Bach deed in turn employs the same words down to and including that of the plaintiff. … Elliot Roads & Streets (3d ed.), § 168; City of Buffalo v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., 39 N. Y. Supp. 4 .
Cited 0 timesPublished49 Misc. 74 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1905
Hamlin v. Stevens, 177 N. Y. 39 ; Mahaney v. Carr, 175 id. 454. … The defendant cites Gall v. Gall, 64 Hun, 600 ; 46 N. Y. St. Rep. 806; Mahaney v. Carr, 175 N. Y. 454 ; and Ide v. Brown, 178 id. 26; but none of these cases has application. In Gall v.
Cited 8 timesPublished10 N.Y.S. 629 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1890
In the case of People v. De Leon, 109 N. Y. 226 , 16 N. E. … J., in Ranney v. People, already cited, “the offense of making afalse and delusive promise, with no intention of performing it.
Cited 3 timesPublished36 Misc. 2d 602 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1962
This “reformatory sentence” is an indefinite sentence in that the prisoner may be released at any time at the discretion of the Board of Parole but in no event can the confinement exceed five years (see People v. … Johnson v. Martin, 283 App. Div. 478 , affd. 307 N. Y. 713 ; People ex rel. Ward v. Jackson, supra; Noyse v. State of New York, supra).
Cited 4 timesPublishedMoses v. City Council of Long Beach
71 Misc. 2d 925 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1972
(See Matter of Ryan v. Hofstra Univ., 67 Misc 2d 651 ; Matter of Janks v. City of Syracuse, 47 Misc 2d 718 .) … Matter of Salgado v. Walsh, 69 Misc 2d 789, 792 .) Since the city failed to afford Mr.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNorris v. Wyoming County Times
34 Misc. 390 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1901
The plaintiffs’ newspaper, the Democrat-Review, was designated by the Democratic supervisors of Wyoming county at the'annual session of the Board of Supervisors in 1897, as the Democratic newspaper to publish the session … Donnelly v. Riggs, 19 Misc. Rep. 693 ), or the Monroe county case (People v. Supervisors of Monroe County, 60 Hun, 328 ), at variance with the views which have been herein expressed.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Lehigh Valley Rail Way Co. v. Clover
174 Misc. 44 · New York Supreme Court · May 3, 1940
Bank v. … The trustees (for in the instant case the entire board of trustees acted and not a committee) as well as the assessors are thus necessary parties to this proceeding. (People ex rel. Union Bag & Paper Corp. v.
Cited 5 timesPublished180 Misc. 515 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1943
No objections were filed with the Board of Elections against the validity of the certificate which designated Jack O’Brien as such candidate for Mayor. … (Matter of Taylor v. Redmond, 239 App. Div. 112 .)
Cited 2 timesPublished89 Misc. 2d 535 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1977
The fire spread to the adjoining building at 35 Gaerck Street which was occupied by Caroline Brown and this was the building mentioned in the indictment. … (See, also, People v Fowler, 178 Cal 657.)
Cited 3 timesPublishedKuhn v. Commissioner of Education
208 Misc. 1019 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1955
In Corbett v. Union Free School Dist. … Such administrative decisions are entitled to weight (Matter of Hill v. Board of Educ. of Central School Dist. No. 2 of Town of Glenville, 286 App. Div. 332, 338 ).
Cited 1 timesPublishedConsumers' Gas & Electric Light Co. v. Congress Spring Co.
15 N.Y.S. 624 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1891
The answer does not deny that the board of trustees of the village granted plaintiff consent to erect its poles and string its wires, or allege any fact tending to invalidate such grant of consent, except the allegation that … Porter v. Purdy, 29 N. Y. 106 . The ordinance of the board of trustees is a legislative act. Duryee v. Mayor, etc., 96 N. Y. 477 ; Mayor, etc., v. Third Ave. R. Co., 1 N. Y. Supp. 397 .
Cited 8 timesPublished72 Misc. 2d 775 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1972
The board of esthriate * * * can limit the maximum amount which the council can appropriate * * * they cannot compel the council to adopt a single one of their figures.” (Kirk v. McGuire, 32 Misc. 596, 598-599 ). … (See, e.g., Matter of Hogan v. Culkin, 18 N Y 2d 330, 335; Levine v. Bornstein, 4 N Y 2d 241, 244; see, also, McKinney’s Cons. Laws of N. Y., Book 1, Statutes, §§ 92, 95, 96, 97, 98, 111.) ’’ (Rankin v.
Cited 2 timesPublished43 Misc. 2d 377 · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 1964
In Matter of Baum v. … Thus, in Matter of Orlando v.
Cited 4 timesPublished43 Misc. 2d 35 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1964
(Matter of Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. v. Allen, 6 N Y 2d 127, 141.) … This question was settled in the Allen case (Matter of Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. v. Allen, supra.)
Cited 1 timesPublished13 Misc. 2d 841 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1958
(Matter of Hughes v. Harrer, supra; Matter of Bruno v. Meisser, supra; Matter of Haskell v. … (Matter of Bennett v. Board of Elections of County of Onondaga, 10 Misc 2d 804 .)
Cited 3 timesPublishedIn re the Arbitration between Teachers Ass'n & Board of Education
61 Misc. 2d 492 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1969
Ordinarily, 1 ‘ The court may not vacate the award because of a mistake of fact (case cited) or a ‘ perverse misconstruction ’ of law (case cited) ” (Agur v. … Prac., par. 7510.06; Korein v. Rabin, 29 A D 2d 351, 356).
Reversed by In re the Arbitration between Teachers Ass'n, Central High School District No. 3 & Board of Education, Central High School District No. 3, 34 A.D.2d 351 (1970)Cited 5 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Kaminsky v. Silberglitt
30 Misc. 2d 813 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1961
that a presumption of concurrence was applicable in the circumstance of these two unrelated crimes was rejected in a decision of the Court of Appeals on July 7, 1961, subsequent to our prior determination (see Matter of Browne … v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedJoseph Walker & Sons v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.
8 Misc. 2d 1005 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1957
The board of directors meets regularly every month in Philadelphia. The three board meetings in New York were for the purpose of accommodating the convenience of two of the members. … S. 189 ; Dollar Co. v. Canadian Car & Foundry Co., 220 N. Y. 270 ; J. C. F. Holding Corp. v. General Gas & Elec. Corp., 46 N. Y. S. 2d 605, 614; Hulick v. Petroleum Corp. of America, 198 App. Div. 359 ; Feingold v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedSouth Shore Securities Co. v. Goode
5 Misc. 2d 972 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1957
An excellent collation of authorities and exposition of the law is found in Brown v. Brown ( 91 Misc. 220 ). … Div. 899 ); Fischer v. Plum ( 273 App. Div. 818 ); Rogers v. Reynolds ( 226 App.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMazzella v. Bedford Central School District
49 Misc. 3d 675 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 21, 2015
Once again, she appealed her score to a joint review board, consisting of two union-appointed members and one district-appointed member, which board unanimously denied her appeal. … Board of Educ. of E.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna