Case law

People ex rel. Watkins v. Commissioners of Excise

4 Misc. 547 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1893

People v. MoGloin, 91 N. Y. 250 ; Gibson v. Lenane, 91 id. 183. … People v. Lacombe, 99 N.

People v. Buckley

178 Misc. 545 · New York Supreme Court · May 29, 1942

Mummiani v. Lawes, 258 App. Div. 643 .) … For the time when a prisoner can be released by the Parole Board is fixed by his minimum sentence less the allowance credited to him for compensation. (People ex rel. Mason v. Brophy, 235 App. Div. 432 .)

Bowers v. Smith

8 N.Y.S. 226 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1889

See Bendernagle v. Cocks, 19 Wend. 207 ; Obeirne v. Lloyd, 43 N. Y. 248 ; Hopf v. Myers, 42 Barb. 270 . … In Hopf v.

New York State Ass'n of Criminal Defense Lawyers v. Kaye

182 Misc. 2d 85 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1999

Socy. v Cuomo, 167 AD2d 168, 172 [1st Dept 1990]; see also, Matter of Dental Socy. v Carey, supra). … The Court of Appeals has defined arbitrary action as being “without sound basis in reason and * * * without regard to the facts” (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 231 [1974]).

Heller v. Clark Merchandisers, Inc.

9 Misc. 2d 106 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1955

(Clark v. Dodge, 269 N. Y. 410, 416 ; Benintendi v. Kenton Hotel, 294 N. Y. 112, 118 .) The law, of course, will not sanction a “sterilized” board of directors (Long Park v. Trenton-New Brunswick Theatres Co., 297 N. … Article 78 is a general statute which obtains where no other remedy is specifically provided (Matter of L’Hommedieu v. Board of Regents, 276 App. Div. 494 , 502; Moir v. Provident Sav. Life Assur. Soc., 127 App.

People ex rel. American Contracting & Dredging Co. v. Wemple

14 N.Y.S. 859 · New York Supreme Court · May 21, 1891

People v. Board of Fire Com'rs, 73 N. Y. 437 . … In the case of People v.

Dyte v. Lawley

20 Misc. 2d 988 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1959

Div. 956 ; Matter of Gallagher v. Cohen, 180 Misc. 1030 ; Matter of Kaplan v. Meisser, 196 Misc. 6 ; Matter of King v. Cohen, 293 N. Y. 435 ). In Matter of Kaplan v. … (Petito v. Heffernan, 115 N. Y. S. 2d 118.) Petitioner maintains that the board did not mail him notice as required by section 145 of the Election Law but sent a telegram instead.

People ex rel. Conway v. Barker

14 Misc. 360 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1895

Wood v. Lacombe, 99 N. Y. 43 . … Drake v. Sutton, 88 Hun, 171 .

O'Connor v. Power

24 Misc. 2d 918 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1959

(Matter of Dorsey v. Cohen, 268 N. Y. 620 ; Matter of Crosbie v. Cohen, 281 N. Y. 329 ; Matter of Lerner v. Cohen, 262 N. Y. 450 ; Matter of Loreto v. Cohen, 268 N. … The Board of Elections cannot pass on questions of invalidity requiring the determination of issues of fact such as are ordinarily raised by claims of fraud or forgery. (Matter of Waters v. Cohen, 248 App. Div. 830 .)

Moore v. Sunshine

126 Misc. 2d 284 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1984

Respondents cite Matter of Irwin v Board of Regents ( 27 NY2d 292 ) and Matter of Whalen v John P. ( 72 AD2d 961 ) for the proposition that the court may not involve itself with the issuance of subpoenas before an agency … [a]), with respect to *286 administrative boards, governs the issuance of subpoenas by those boards not already granted this power by statute, and as to those administrative boards to whom a specific grant of subpoena power

Olin v. Town of North Hempstead

34 Misc. 2d 853 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1962

The legislative power which the State has delegated to towns lies in the Town Board. … Railroad v. Matthews, 174 U. S. 96 ).”

In re Houligan

55 Misc. 5 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1907

Nichols v. Board of Canvassers, 12 N. Y. 359 , 402, 407; People ex rel. Feeny v. Board of Canvassers, 156 id. 36. … Nichols v. Board of Canvassers, supra, and People ex rel. Feeny v.

Tong v. National Broadcasting Co.

150 Misc. 2d 4 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1990

(See, e.g., Lavender v V & B Transmissions & Auto Repair, 897 F2d 805 [5th Cir 1990]; Doffoney v Board of Trustees, 731 F Supp 781 [ED Tex 1989]; Rivera v AT&T Information Sys., 719 F Supp 962 [D Colo 1989]; Morgan v Kansas … Despite considerable misgivings on my part (see the detailed and especially scholarly opn in Hicks v Brown Group, 902 F2d 630 [8th Cir 1990]), I conclude, albeit with great reluctance, that I must follow the trend in the

Cocron v. Cocron

84 Misc. 2d 335 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1975

(Boessenkool v Boessenkool, 42 Misc 2d 945, 946 , affd 21 AD2d 855 ; Taubenfeld v Taubenfeld, 276 App Div 873 , rearg and app den 276 App Div 918 ; Brown v Brown, 55 Misc 2d 174, 176.) … To meet the residency requirement at commencement of the action, the court resorted to section 231 (Boessenkool v Boessenkool, supra; Brown v Brown, supra).

In re the Investigation of Buffalo Softball League, Inc.

135 Misc. 2d 973 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1987

(Matter of LaGuardia v Smith, 288 NY 1 [1942]; Matter of L. Shain, 92 NJ 524, 457 A2d 828 [1983], citing LaGuardia v Smith as authority; Eggers v Kenny, 15 NJ 107, 104 A2d 10 [1954].) … (Matter of LaGuardia v Smith, 288 NY 1, 4 , supra.)

Scofield v. McGregor

9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 679 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1874

Finnegan v. Cohen

177 Misc. 142 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1941

(Matter of Powers v. Coughlin, 268 N. Y. 623 .) … (See Surace v. Danna, 248 N. Y. 18, 21 .)

Doe v. Axelrod

132 Misc. 2d 980 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1986

Holtzman, 60 NY2d 46 ; Matter of Dondi v Jones, 40 NY2d 8 ). … (Matter of Schumer v Holtzman, 60 NY2d 46, 51 , supra; Matter of State of New York v King, 36 NY2d 59 .)

Town of Preble v. Song Mountain, Inc.

62 Misc. 2d 353 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1970

Nor was a copy of the zoning ordinance “ entered in the minutes of the town board ’ ’ as the statute, section 264 of the Town Law, requires. (Cohn v. Town of Cazenovia, 42 Misc 2d 218 ; Town of Schroeppel v. … (Andrews v. Perry, 127 Misc. 320, 322 .)

People v. Axentiou

158 Misc. 2d 19 · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 1993

This holding was contrary to a previous holding in People v Brown ( 69 Misc 2d 412 [Suffolk County Ct 1972]), that Suffolk County did not have venue of the larceny of proceeds of a sale of land located in that county, where … The court in Crean distinguished Brown on the grounds that Brown was limited to considering whether an element of the offense occurred in Suffolk County.