Case law

Franklin v. Krause

83 Misc. 2d 42 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1975

(The reference to Iannucci is to Iannucci v Board of Supervisors of County of Washington, 20 NY2d 244 .) In November, 1974 the weighted voting plan was submitted to the electorate. … Therefore, he expressed a preference for one which had been proposed by the board and directed that it be submitted to the voters for their consideration on June 10, 1975 (Franklin v Krause, 81 Misc 2d 52 ).

Lewis v. Davis

3 Johns. 17 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1808

In the case before us, the first mate gave the crew permission to go on shore, requiring only that the second mate should return and sleep on board. … B. in the case of Thompson v. Collins, (4 Bos. & Pul. 347.) who were inclined to think that each person ought to answer for his own default.

Shaughnessy v. Monahan

79 Misc. 2d 648 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1974

” Respondent Travers relies on People v. Pease ( 27 N. Y. 45 ) and People ex rel. Deister v. Wintermute ( 122 App. Div. 349 , affd. 194 N. Y. 99 ), and Matter of Creedon ( 264 N. Y. 40 ). … Deister v. Wintermute, 194 N. Y. 99 ).” • The motion of respondent F. Warren Travers to dismiss the petition of petitioner Dan G. Farano is therefore granted.

Burke v. Krug

161 Misc. 687 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1936

New York Electric Lines Co. v. Squire, 107 id. 593, at p. 601; Matter of McAneny v. Board of Estimate & Apportionment of City of New York, 232 id. 377, at pp. 392, 393.) … Einsfeld v. Murray [ 149 N. Y. 367 ]; Admiral Realty Co. v. City of N. Y. [206 id. 110]; Matter of McAneny v. Board of Estimate & Apportionment of City of New York, supra).

Rivera v. County of Westchester

188 Misc. 2d 746 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 6, 2001

(Frake v City of Chicago, 210 F3d 779, 781 [7th Cir 2000], citing Bell v Wolfish, 441 US 520 [1979].) … Sys., 2001 WL 345810 , *5, 2001 US App LEXIS 5394, *13 [6th Cir, Mar. 26, 2001, Batchelder, J.], quoting Board of County Commrs. v Brown, 520 US 397 [1997].)

Duval v. Commercial Insurance

10 Johns. 278 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1813

on board, and sealed her hatches. … This was the doctrine of this court in the case of Schieffelin v. New-York Ins. Co. (9 Johns. Rep. 27.)

Patterson v. Parker

2 Hill & Den. 598 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1842

v. … (Brown v. Van Duzer, 11 John. 472 ; Harris v. Underwood, 10 Wend. 668 .) Under the present statute the defendant is to give a bond, instead of a recognizance, conditioned to appear and put in bail in the C. P. (2 R.

People v. Koeber

7 Hill & Den. 39 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1844

(Vose v. Dean, 7 Mass. R. 280 ; Commonwealth v. Loveridge, 11 id. 337 ; *42 Commonwealth v. Otis, 16 id. 198; The People v. Brown, 23 Wend. 49, referring to 2 R. S. 286, § 59.) … Rep. 641 ; Commonwealth v. Downing, 9 id. 520; The People v. Blankman, 17 Wend. 252 ; The People v. Brown , 23 id. 47; Barb. Cr. Law, 503; Harrington v. Brown, 7 Pick. 234 ; Waldo v. Spencer, 7 Conn. Rep. 71 .)

S. S. Pennock Co. v. Ferretti

201 Misc. 563 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1951

Act, § 876-a, subd. 10; May’s Furs v. Bauer, 282 N. Y. 331, 337-339 ; Strauss v. Steiner, 173 Misc. 521 ; but see Bond Stores v. Turner, 258 App. … Y. 188,198 ; see Building Service Union v. Gazzam, 339 U. S. 532, 540 , supra). It may be observed in this connection that Exchange Bakery v. Rifkin ( 245 N. Y. 260 ), Stillwell Theatre v. Kaplan ( 259 N.

Van Rensselaer v. Witbeck

7 Barb. 133 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1849

To these objects, the power of review, *139 vested in the board of supervisors, is limited. … (See also Weaver v. Devendorf, 3 Denio, 117 ; Williams v. Holden, 4 Wend. 223 ; Van Rensselaer v.

Szold v. Outlet Embroidery Supply Co.

159 Misc. 911 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1936

(Matter of Jensen v. Southern Pacific Co., 215 N. Y. 514 ; N. Y. Central R. R. Co. v. White, 243 U. S. 188 ; Dahlstrom Metallic Door Co. v. Industrial Board, 284 id. 594; Miller Cabinet Co. v. … (Lawrence v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 239 Mass. 424 ; 132 N. E. 174 ; People v. Witte, 315 Ill. 282 ; 146 N. E. 178 .)

D. R. W. v. State

116 Misc. 2d 655 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1982

Conduct v Schlesinger, 84 AD2d 879 ; Matter of Rainka v Whalen, 73 AD2d 731 .) … (People v Branch, 46 NY2d 645, 651-652 ; People v Blyden, 55 NY2d 73 ; People v Harris, 84 AD2d 63 .)

In re the Designation of Schermerhorn

141 Misc. 228 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 1, 1931

This motion comes before me for an order directing and requiring the board of elections to retain on file and accept a certain certificate heretofore filed with Clarence V. R. … Ford Schermerhorn was filed with the board of elections no action on the certificate designating Arthur E. Walker had been taken by the board. On August 26, 1931, Joseph H.

New York State Supreme Court Officers Ass'n v. New York State Unified Court System

2 Misc. 3d 960 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 20, 2004

Matter of Irwin v Board of Regents of Univ. of State of N.Y., 27 NY2d 292 [1970]). … The referenced decision, relying on both Matter of Irwin v Board of Regents ( 27 NY2d 292 ) and Matter of Silverman v State Liq.

Graves v. Barber

193 Misc. 326 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1948

At a meeting of the board on August 2,1947, the following resolution was adopted: ‘ ‘ Motion made by J. C. Harford and seconded by V. B. Piper, that President Barber call George R. … Petitioner, seeking to be reinstated as a teacher by the defendant board, contends that the action of the board in terminating her services was unlawful in two respects.

Twin City Service Station, Inc. v. City of North Tonawanda

162 Misc. 271 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1937

(People v. Raymond, 37 N. Y. 428 ; Same v. Albertson, 55 N. Y. 50.) ” (Wenzler v. People, 58 N. Y. 516, 529 .) … . *274 In People v.

Incorporated Village of Walden v. Rusk

44 Misc. 2d 216 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1964

Even though section 706 permits a Town Board to consent to such an annexation of uninhabited territory without the presentation to it of the petition prescribed in section 704 of article 17 and without the holding of the

Hartnett v. Segur

39 Misc. 2d 1071 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1963

Roscoe V. Elsworth, J. … Many other uses are specifically prohibited in any part of the town by the last subdivision of article V of the Zoning Ordinance.

People ex rel. Develin v. Asten

11 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 461 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1875

Donnelly v. Shea

50 Misc. 2d 787 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1966

(Matter of Flaherty v. Craig, 226 N. Y. 76 .) The Charter of the City of Cohoes recognizes that the budget is an appropriation. (Cohoes City Charter, § 96.) … (Matter of Hushion v. Barker, 253 App. Div. 376 .)