Case law

Schmidt v. Brown

30 N.Y.S. 1135 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1894

Brown v. King

17 N.Y.S. 678 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1892

The proof, therefore, as it seems to me, brought the case within the rule stated in Hooley v. Gieve, 9 Abb. N.

Boylan v. Brown

17 N.Y.S. 648 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1892

Marsh v. Chickering, 101 N. Y. 396 , 5 N. E. Rep. 56; Cahill v. Hilton, 106 N. Y. 512 , 13 N. E. Rep. 339; Splittorf v. State, 108 N. Y. 205 , 15 N. E. Rep. 322; McQuigan v. Railroad Co., 122 N. Y. 618 , 26 N. E. … Rep. 13; McGrath v. Walsh, (Com. Pl. N. Y.) 4 N. Y. Supp. 705 .

Brown v. Allen

34 N.Y.S. 805 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1895

Lamerson v. Marvin, 8 Barb. 9 ; Farnham v. Hotchkiss, * 41 N. Y. 9 . … Talmadge v. Wallis, 25 Wend. 116 . In Cowdrey v. Coit, 44 FT.

Dryer v. Brown

9 N.Y.S. 703 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1889

Babbitt v. Brown

23 N.Y.S. 25 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1893

In the case of Morgan v. Troxell, 69 N. … As was said in Richardson & Boynton Co. v. Richardson & Morgan Co., (Sup.) 8 N. Y.

Bonnett v. Brown

13 N.Y.S. 395 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1891

Vanderburgh before the sale had died, and had devised a life-estate in the premises to her daughter Eugenia V. Brown, with remainder to her children. … Pitt v. Davison, 37 N. Y. 235 . The resale was properly granted.

Sims v. Brown

6 Thomp. & Cook 5 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1875

In Marvin v. … Langley v. Warner, 1 Sandf. 209 ; Matter of Bleakley, 5 Paige, 311 . The general rule, doubtless, is that ah agent cannot dispute the title of his principal to property intrusted to him by the latter.

Holmes v. Brown

13 Barb. 599 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1852

of the poor of the town of Pharsalia, to recover such expenses; but that such expenses must be laid before the superintendents of the poor of Chenango county and allowed by them, and then presented to or laid before the board … (Olney v. Wickes, 18 John. 122 . Walker v. Swartwout, 12 Id. 444. 1 Mass. Rep. 208 . King v. Butler, 15 John. 281 . Macbeath v. Haldiman, 1 T. R. 172. Hodgson v. Dexter, 1 Cranch, 345 .)

Wormser v. Brown

25 N.Y.S. 1124 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1893

Brown v. Mitchell

2 Abb. Pr. 481 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1856

I cannot but concur with Justice Parker, in Grant v. McCaughan, (4 How. Pr. … In Catlin v. Gunter, ( 1 Duer, 253 ), the court refused to amend pleadings, to conform to the evidence produced on the trial.

Hebler v. Brown

41 N.Y.S. 441 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1896

Laws 1890, c. 475; Whitbeck v. Cook, 15 Johns. 490 ; Stanard v. Eldridge, 16 Johns. 254 ; Packer v. Railroad Co., 17 N. Y. 295 . … Laws 1890, c. 475; Boreel v. Lawton, 90 N. Y. 293 ; Bawle, Cov. 144.

Bain v. Brown

7 Lans. 506 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1872

Brown;” and he testifies that on that day or the next day he forwarded a duplicate thereof to Bain at Philadelphia for execution, who brought it back to Hew York, where it was also executed by Bain. … (Conkey v. Bond, 36 N. Y., 427 ; Gardner v. Ogden, 22 id., 327.) We think the judgment entered on the report of the referee should be affirmed.

Brown v. Hall

5 Lans. 177 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1871

(Brown on Frauds, § 318.) In Vincent v. … I am strongly inclined to think that, by the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, Hall became Brown’s bailee, and his possession was Brown’s possession.

Brown v. Littlefield

11 N.Y. 467 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1833

The case of Rawson v. Turner, 4 Johns. … James v. Price, 1 Vent. Rep. 269. 3 Keble, 463, S. C.

Paddock v. Brown

6 Hill & Den. 530 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1844

(Brockway v. Allen, 17 Wend. 40 .) … The original should have been produced, or accounted for, according to the case of Jackson v. Leggett, ( 7 Wend. 377 .) New trial granted.

Briggs v. Brown

3 Hill & Den. 87 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1842

Judgment for the plaintiff, (a) See Hurst v. Cook, ( 19 Wend. 463 to 470,) and the cases there cited.

Crosby v. Brown

44 How. Pr. 149 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1872

Groesbeck v. Brown

2 How. Pr. 21 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1845

The judgment against Brown must be set aside. Whipple had no authority to confess a judgment as his attorney. Brown *has a defence on the merits, and the attorney is not responsible. … Motion granted that the judgment and execution as against the defendant Brown be set aside, with $10 costs.

Smith v. Brown

6 How. Pr. 383 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1852