Case law

Price v. Brown

39 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 66 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1884

Brown v. Walker

30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 526 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1881

Brown v. Becht

30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 665 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1881

Brown v. Danforth

62 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1890

Vanderwerken v. Brown

45 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 234 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1885

In Quirk v. Wixon ( 27 Hun, 592 ) the plaintiff recovered eight dollars in Justices’ Court. The defendant appealed, and on a new trial in County Court the plaintiff was beaten. … The same was decided in Snyder v. Hughes ( 27 Hun, 374 ), in a similar case. We are referred to no other cases on this point. These should control us.

Judd v. Brown

45 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 640 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1885

Price v. Brown

45 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 641 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1885

Brown v. Vanderwerker

46 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 653 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1886

Higginson v. Brown

46 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 658 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1886

Phillips v. Brown

41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 627 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1884

Moore v. Brown

69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1891

Brown v. Doscher

73 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 626 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1892

People v. Brown

6 Park. Cr. 666 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1865

It is not necssary to deviate from the ruling in the case of The People v. … (Ib., 658; Churchill v. Crease, 5 Bing., 180, 492, 493.)

Brown v. Burdick

18 Wend. 269 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1835

Barnard v. Brown

28 N.Y.S. 1132 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1894

Brown v. Fishel

31 N.Y.S. 361 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1894

The plaintiff is a son of Frances Maria Brown, and makes his title under the aforesaid conveyance. … Brown, therefore, the street was open and used, and was the principal thoroughfare of the village.

Standen v. Brown

31 N.Y.S. 535 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1894

Brown of the numerous little mortgages which I held, and it was done in this way in order that the colonel might not be bothered with the collection of small amounts of interest, but might look to me for such payments in

People v. Brown

1 Cai. Cas. 416 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1803

be gathered from the two principal cases, relied on, that of Sir Moyle Finch, and of Sir George Reynel, as well as from the decision of the court for the correction of errors, in the case of The Devisees of Van Schaick v.

Whitaker v. Brown

11 N.Y. 75 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1833

This was the doctrine distinctly held by this court in Jaques and others v. Marquand, 6 Cowen, 497, a case very analogous to this, so far as the application of this principle is concerned.

Brown v. Mitchell

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 88 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1799