Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,656 results
0.47s
Evyan Perfumes, Inc. v. Hamilton
22 Misc. 2d 616 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1959
It may well be that the attorneys advised that the corporation should not qualify. … The mere fact that reference is made by defendant in one of his affidavits to the terminated action does not ipso facto establish its relevance to the instant proceeding.
Cited 5 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Beck v. Board of Aldermen
18 Misc. 533 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1896
The relator is clearly a “ practical ” mechanic, because he has devoted himself for several years to the actual drawing of plans for, and the construction of, buildings of various kinds.- I am of the opinion that it is possible … So that the question whether the relator is legally qualified to fill the position he occupies or not is not open for Consideration by the board of aldermen.
Cited 6 timesPublishedTrustees of Columbia University v. Town of Orangetown
93 Misc. 2d 261 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1976
In the particular area of study at the observatory, it is requisite for those who seek the degrees above referred to to establish by research the basis of a dissertation which in turn must be defended by the applicant before … Clearly, the research done by the students as well as the research done by other nonstudent members, the results of which are made available to the students, are clearly within the educational field.
Cited 1 timesPublishedEmpire State Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Smith
30 Misc. 3d 455 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 19, 2010
To set higher dollar thresholds downstate was clearly within the Legislature’s discretion and that act by the Legislature in implementing the 2008 amendments will not be interfered with by this court. … Turning then to the remaining 20 causes of action set forth in plaintiffs’ complaint, although they find a multiplicity of denominations (privileges and immunities [2, 3], Dormant Commerce Clause [4, 5], taxpayer [6], equal
Cited 4 timesPublishedHerlihy v. Metropolitan Museum of Art
160 Misc. 2d 279 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1994
The claim that there would be a chilling effect on the making of discrimination complaints unless they were absolutely privileged, and the complainants given immunity under all circumstances must yield to accommodate the … Thus, communications made during the course of an investigation into sexual harassment or other improprieties are protected by the qualified privilege.
Cited 4 timesPublished109 Misc. 2d 341 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1981
The text of the article clearly states that plaintiff ceased teaching after receiving injuries from a student assault. … If applicable and operative, any one of these privileges imbues the defendants with total immunity from defamation liability arising out of the article’s publication.
Cited 6 timesPublishedPeople v. Ass'n of Contracting Plumbers of City of New York, Inc.
57 Misc. 2d 256 · New York Supreme Court · May 23, 1968
Defendants claim immunity because of bona fide labor union exemption in the Donnelly Act. As to this contention, Falciglia v. … Gallagher ( 164 Misc. 838 ) clearly states the rule. *263 That case held that the Legislature had no intention of giving immunity and sanctity to union activities designed not to further the ends of labor, but to advance
Cited 1 timesPublishedGiannicos v. Bellevue Hospital Medical Center
7 Misc. 3d 403 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 1, 2005
Giannicos pending the determination of whether he qualified for an insanity toll to the statute of limitations under CPLR 208. (Id.) The basis of the toll was to ascertain Mr. … construed; and its application must be consistent with the purposes underlying the immunity.”
Cited 6 timesPublishedNational Variety Artists, Inc. v. Mosconi
169 Misc. 982 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1939
Hence, the alleged libel can only be established by proof of extrinsic facts. Under such circumstances, it is required that the plaintiff allege special damages. (O’Connell v. Press Pub. Co., 214 N. Y. 352 .) … Qualified privilege is a defense where there is no allegation or proof of malice. The complaint sufficiently charges malice to meet a claim of qualified privilege. (Mellen v. Athens Hotel, 153 App. Div. 891 .)
Cited 8 timesPublished9 Barb. 680 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1851
To hold that the legislature may enact laws but shall not prescribe the time, or.event, or condition, upon which they shall *685 take effect, would be to qualify and abridge powers clearly and necessarily vested in them. … By one of the sections of that act it was submitted to the qualified electors of the county to determine the question of retrocession.
Cited 8 timesPublishedMetal Goods & Manufacturers Insurance Trust Fund v. Advent Tool & Mold, Inc.
19 Misc. 3d 608 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 5, 2008
due to failure to make the required contributions or [in] any way ceases to qualify as an eligible Employer. … The Trustees’ authority to issue assessments to the members in the event it is required, is not currently clearly addressed in the trust document.
Cited 3 timesPublishedConsolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment
98 Misc. 2d 491 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1979
While the conclusion reached by this court leaves the equalization rate established by the State Board effectively immune to attack by the owner of a special franchise for incorrectness or inaccuracy, however great, the potential … It was there held that the State Board’s assessment of a special franchise is immune to attack by a municipality.
Cited 2 timesPublished127 Misc. 2d 255 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1984
What items qualify as “improvements” shall have to be defined with some precision. Under traditional concepts of law, the term “improvements” to the realty is well understood. … Some items would clearly be removable personalty and not qualify as improvements under any definition.
Cited 4 timesPublished180 Misc. 2d 804 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1999
Defendant Work testified in exchange for immunity against prosecution in criminal proceedings against plaintiff Koen. … The State Legislature clearly recognized the problems presented by false identification as evidenced by their inclusion of such provisions in Alcoholic Beverage Control Law §§ 65 and 65-b.
Cited 3 timesPublished167 Misc. 2d 1 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1995
Justices Black, Douglas and Goldberg favored absolute immunity for criticism of public officials. … While absolute immunity protects the press from suit even when the publication is in error, it is equally true that qualified immunity will inhibit the free debate that leads to the truth. (Areopagitica, op. cit.)
Cited 1 timesPublished4 N.Y.S. 247 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1889
They can claim no immunity under that organization. … Such conduct and refusal was-clearly contumacious. While the order was in force it was the duty of the defendant to obey it, and not to avoid it by subterfuges.
Cited 7 timesPublishedElite Funding Corp. v. Mid-Hudson Better Business Bureau
165 Misc. 2d 497 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1995
There is nothing, however, before this court to establish the requisite state of mind. … Moreover, even if said to be a qualified one, to overcome the privilege of fair comment, the plaintiff must *503 again produce evidentiary facts establishing malice on the part of the defendant (Wehringer v Newman, supra,
Cited 2 timesPublished54 Misc. 2d 956 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1967
Clearly the pertinent portion of the San Francisco Charter above quoted is much broader than the analogous provisions of the New York City Charter. … The device sought to be utilized by petitioners — creation of a new office to perform functions clearly beyond the ambit and ability of the city to implement- — -is an obvious attempt to avoid the impact of well-established
Cited 8 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. National Surety Co. v. Feitner
31 Misc. 433 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1900
If it can be shown that it does not impair the actual value of capital stock *436 and surplus, clearly then it is not entitled to immunity from taxation. … Taxation is the rule, exemption the exception, and must be clearly established. No person or property is impliedly exempt, and the statute is to be strictly construed against the claimant. People ex rel.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMaloney v. Nassau County Civil Service Commission
91 Misc. 2d 581 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1977
This list, established on June 8, 1972, was extended pursuant to section 56 of the Civil Service Law, expired on June 7, 1976. … In the matter before this court, the petitioner is seeking to qualify for an open competitive position.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna