Case law

Brown v. Taber

5 Wend. 566 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1830

Brown v. Kimball

25 Wend. 259 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1840

See also Milward v. Temple, 1 Campb. 375. … So in the case of Whitlock v. Mus grove, 1 Cromp. & Mees.

Parsons v. Brown

15 Barb. 590 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1853

(Dunlap v. Patterson, 5 Cowen, 243. Douglass v. McAlister, 3 Cranch, 298 . Smith v. Carrington, 4 Id. 62. Vasse v. Smith, 6 Id. 226. Burtch v. Nickerson, 17 John. 217 . Ward v. Lee, 13 Wend. 41 . Gardner v. … Ford v. Monroe, 20 Id. 210. Simpson v. Downing, 23 Id. 316. Stafford v. Bacon, 1 Hill, 532 . Underhill v. Pomeroy, 2 Id. 603 .)

Brown v. Hoburger

52 Barb. 15 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1868

In Dunlap v. Snyder, ( 17 Barb. 561 ,) it was held unanimously by the four judges that such evidence was incompetent, overruling the decision in Brill v. Flagler, ( 23 Wend. 354 .) … In Brill v. Flagler , thus overruled, the court held that the opinion of a witness as to the value of a dog was larely competent. That was the ease of a “ well broke setter dog.”

Brown v. Mott

7 Johns. 361 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1811

(Wiffer v. Roberts, 1 Esp. N. P. 261.) … The cases of Smith v. Knox„ (3 Esp. N. P. 4.) and Charles v.

Brown v. Genung

1 Wend. 115 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1828

In Livingston v. Rogers, ( 1 Caines, 583 ,) it was held that the want of an award of venire upon the record, was ground for arresting the judgment. In The People v. McKay, (18 Johns. … (Thomas v. Weed, 14 Johns. R. 255. Van Slyck v. Hogeboom, 6 Johns. R. 270.) The action of debt against the sheriff for an escape, is given by the 19th section of the act concerning sheriffs, &c. (1 R. L. *118 425.

Brown v. Norton

2 N.Y.S. 869 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1888

Oakley v. Morton, 11 N. Y. 25, 30, 31 ; Baker v. Higgins, 21 N. Y. 397 ; Hill v. Heller, 27 Hun, 416 . … Brown v. Weber, 38 N. Y. 187 . And, as no such performance took place in this instance, the principle, in its full and unqualified force, is applicable to the disposition of this controversy.

Henderson v. Brown

1 Cai. Cas. 92 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1803

They have also an appeal from the assessors to the commissioners, similar to that from *our assessors; [*99] and in the case of Harrison v. Bullock and others, reported in H.

Finch v. Brown

13 Wend. 601 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1835

Tappan v. Brown

9 Wend. 175 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1832

The true ground of this recovery, I consider, as given by Heath, J. in Farmer v. Russell, 1 Bos. & Pul. 296, that whether the consideration be good or bad, a man may recover his own money.” … the plaintiff to his agent, which was the same in judgment of law as if it had been paid directly to him; the illegal contract was out of the question, and the rule pari delicto did not apply, though Hooke, J. in Farmer v.

Mumford v. Brown

6 Cow. 475 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1826

In Doane v. Badger, ( 12 Mass. … It is, that, till such request and refusal, both tenants are in equal fault, one having as much reason to complain as the other. _ _ In Loring v. Bacon, ( 4 Mass.

Seymour v. Brown

19 Johns. 44 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1821

The general law of bailment was very ably discussed by Lord Holt, in Coggs v. Barnard; (2 Ld.

Slack v. Brown

13 Wend. 390 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1835

Brown v. Smith

24 Barb. 419 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1857

The case of Van Rensselaer v. … (See also Van Rensselaer v. Wit-beck, 7 Barb. 133 .)

People v. Brown

23 Wend. 47 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1840

Brown v. Dean

3 Wend. 208 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1829

Upon the first issue they find (to negative the plea) that William Dean was seised, as averred in his avowries, and leased the premises to Dyer, who held the same as tenant to Dean; and that the plaintiff Brown held as the … In the case of Sullivan v. Stradling, (2 Wils. 208 to 218,) the subject was much discused, and the conclusion of the court was that such a plea is bad.

Ericsson v. Brown

38 Barb. 390 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 3, 1862

The decision in Conant v. Van Schaick, ( 24 Barb. 87 ,) does not touch this case. *393 [New York General Term, November 3, 1862. The finding of facts by the referee covers the whole ground.

Kimball v. Brown

7 Wend. 322 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1831

In Ramchander v. Hammond, 2 Johns. … Tucker v. Ives, 6 Cowen, 195. The case of Tucker v.

Mahan v. Brown

13 Wend. 261 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1835

And in the case of Bury v. Pope, Cro. … So in Morley v. Pragnell, Cro.

Smith v. Brown

1 Wend. 231 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1828

Brown sued Smith in the court below, for the penalty under the tenth section of the act for the inspection of flour and meal, and to establish the standard weight of grain, passed March 5th, 1813. … In Ferris v.