Case law

Phillips & Brown v. Hall

8 Wend. 610 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1832

In Gibbs v. Chase, 10 Mass. … In Edson v.

Blattmacher v. Brown

163 Misc. 389 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1937

Bank v. Peters, 123 N. … (Williams v. Van Norden Trust Co., 104 App. Div. 251 ; Blair v. Hill, 50 id. 33; affd., 165 N. Y. 672 .)

Burhans v. Sanford & Brown

19 Wend. 417 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1838

Sinclair v. Eldred, 4 Taunt. 7. See also Purcell v. Macnamara, 9 East, 361. But it now appears that the former action was voluntarily discontinued by the plaintiffs. … Nicholson v. Coghill, 6 Dow. & Ry. 12. Webb v. Hill, 3 Car. & Payne, 495. 1 M. & M. 253, S. C. Malice may be, and usually is inferred in these actions from the want of probable cause.

Brown v. Bristol

1 Cow. 176 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1823

(Shotwell v. Daniels, 8 John. 341 .) Motion denied.

Brown v. Halsted

17 Abb. N. Cas. 197 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1885

The case of Jessup v. Hulse, 21 N. Y. 168 , does not conflict with these views. … The case of DeCamp v. Marshall, 2 Abb. Pr. N.

Brown v. Balde

3 Lans. 283 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1870

It is true the chancellor, in Cudderback v. … (Baygot v. Boulger, 2 Duer, 160 ; People v. Laws, 3 Abbott, Pr. R., 450.)

Brown v. Wyman

59 Misc. 2d 740 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1969

The petitioner, Arlethia Brown, is on welfare and is a resident of the City of Syracuse. She has four children and her husband, James S. Brown, has disappeared. … (Smith v.

Brown v. Green

46 How. Pr. 302 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1873

The board determines the existence of the indebtedness, and the finance department must see to it that proper vouchers are presented, examined and allowed. … He seems to have acted on the assumption that the credit and allowance of the board of supervisors were sufficient. In this he was in error.

People v. Brown

191 Misc. 2d 97 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 2, 2002

Where no statutory right of discovery is provided, no substantive right of discovery exists (s ee, Matter of Miller v Schwartz, supra; Matter of Pittari v Pirro, 258 AD2d 202 ; Matter of Brown v Appelman, 241 AD2d 279 ; Matter … (Brown v Grosso, 285 AD2d 642 , 643-644 [2d Dept 2001].)

Brown v. Shyne

133 Misc. 306 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1928

When the judgment then rendered reached the Court of Appeals (Brown v. Shyne, 242 N. … In view of the definition by the Court of Appeals in Brown v.

Brown v. Phelan

130 Misc. 590 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1927

As is said in Earle v. Earle ( 93 N. … (Bruen v. Gillet, 115 N. Y. 10 ; Croft v. Williams, 88 id. 384; Adair v. Brimmer, 74 id. 539.)

Brown v. Symes

31 N.Y.S. 629 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1894

Brown, as full settlement of claim against me, one hundred and ten 00/100 dollars. “$110. James H. Symes.” The plaintiff retained the check, collected the money upon it, and then brought this suit. … Fuller v. Kemp, 138 *630 N. Y. 231 , 33 N. E. 1034 . As the judgment must be affirmed upon the ground stated, we do not examine the other questions presented by the appellant. The judgment should be affirmed with costs.

People v. Brown

96 Misc. 2d 127 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1978

(People v Public Serv. Mut. Ins. Co., 37 NY2d 606, 612 .) … Shapiro v Keeper of City Prison, 290 NY 393 ). Bail then, within limits, lies within the discretion of the court (People ex rel. Lobell v McDonnell, 296 NY 109 ).

Blackman v. Brown

100 Misc. 2d 566 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1978

As noted in De Lease v Nolan ( 185 App Div 82, 84 ), "[t]he dominion of the State is absolute as far as attendance upon instruction is concerned [and] * * * [t]he consent of the parent to the absence of the child has no effect

Richardson v. Brown

1 Cow. 255 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1823

v presumed, that had it not been for the agreement, an application would have been made and granted, on the return of the warrant, to adjourn for a longer time than 3 days.

Brown v. Gilmore

16 How. Pr. 527 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1858

Brown to the plaintiff, as affecting creditors of the former; putting the validity of the title of the plaintiff in this action upon the presence or absence in that sale, of a design to defraud the creditors of Samuel 0. … Brown. That was not the issue, nor had the defendants a right to litigate that question in the present action, as the circuit judge very properly intimated to the jury in another part of his charge.

Bullis v. Giddens & Brown

8 Johns. 82 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1811

Hubbly v. Brown & Nichols.

16 Johns. 70 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1819

The case is silent as to the fact, whether this was an accommodation note, or not; if it was, then,- on the authority of the case of Jones v. … In the case of Skelding Haight v. Warren, (15 Johns.

White v. Brown

14 How. Pr. 282 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1857

The complaint then contained a copy of the said note, purporting to be signed Thomas Brown, and a statement that the plaintiff was then the bonafide owner and holder of the said note, and that the defendant had not paid the

Clinton v. Brown

41 Barb. 226 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1863

Perkins, the plaintiff’s witnesses, or as stated by the defendant Brown, and two or three others, were questions of fact, as to which the evidence was conflicting. … Brown, to prevent his doing so, stated, in substance, that they (the defendants) would not require it, or that it would make no difference, and thus prevented their being branded.