Case law

Leland v. Brown

136 Misc. 493 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1930

Board of Missions, 102 N. Y. 99 ; McWhorter v. Stewart, 39 App. … (McWhorter v. Stewart, supra.) I hold that the mortgage is valid as against both defendants, Willi am H. Brown and Flora Brown, and that the plaintiff is entitled to the rehef demanded' in the complaint.

People v. Brown

148 Misc. 2d 70 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1989

]; Stumpf v State, 749 P2d 880 [Alaska App 1988], cert denied 109 S Ct 2075 [1989]; State v Zinn, 106 NM 544 , 746 P2d 650 [1987]; State v Comeau, 531 A2d 290 [Me 1987]; Booth v State, 306 Md 313, 508 A2d 976 [1986].) … Brown and the codefendant Mr. O’Donald, entering the lot to Alex and Henry’s and climbing over a fence.

Brown v. Wilbur

8 Wend. 657 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1832

In the case of Denning v. Smith, 3 Johns. Ch. R. 332, Judson was the purchaser at the sale, under the statute, by the commissioners, and received a deed of the premises. … Cook et. al. v.

Brown v. Moses

191 Misc. 360 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1948

Act, § 1296; Matter of Brenner v. Bruckman, 253 App. Div. 607 , appeal dismissed 278 N. Y. 503 ). … Div. 757 ; Matter of Tiernan v. Walsh, 268 App. Div. 962 , affd. 294 N. Y. 299 ).

Jetter v. Brown

200 Misc. 718 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1951

Jetter was negligent and that William Webster Brown was not negligent, bars recovery by the plaintiff in this action. The motion should be denied. Good Health Dairy Products Corp. v. Emery ( 275 N. … (Portland Gold Mining Co. v. Stratton’s Independence, 158 F. 63 ; Note, 16 L. R. A. [N. S.] 677.)

Gill v. Brown

12 Johns. 385 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1815

The reasoning of the court in Callen v. Queensbury, (1 Brown’s Ch. … In Hodgson v.

Kenworthy v. Brown

45 Misc. 292 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1904

.: Hemmens v. Nelson ( 138 N. Y. 517 ) is not in point.

Brown v. Birdsall

29 Barb. 549 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1859

(De Mautort v. Saunders, 1 B. & Adol. 398.) Second. The two dormant partners being residents of other states, no effectual remedy in this state could be had against them.

Brown v. Kennedy

14 Misc. 2d 405 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1956

Brown v. Torrey

24 Barb. 583 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1857

(Jackson v. King, 4 Cowen, 207.) … See further on this point, Blanchard v. Nestle, ( 3 Denio, 37 , and note.)

People v. Brown

82 Misc. 2d 115 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1974

(People v Paulin, 25 NY2d 445, 450 .) … People v Arthur, 22 NY2d 325 .)

Conkling v. Brown

8 Abb. Pr. 345 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1870

Neither acquired any new estate (Wood v. Fleet, 36 N. Y., 499 ). Upon the death, therefore, of Augustus M. Winter, intestate, unmarried, without descendants, leaving no father, the fee descended to his mother, Mrs. … Stat., Edmonds’ ed., 702; Morris v. Ward, 36 N. Y., 587 ). There must be judgment for the plaintiff on the submission. Ingraham and George G. Barnard, JJ., concurred.

Brown v. Cherry

56 Barb. 635 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 6, 1868

In Rowland v. … (Bogart v. O’Regan, 1 E. D. Smith, 591.) In Minturn v.

Allen v. Brown

51 Barb. 86 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 4, 1865

In Jackson v. … The case of Floyd v. Day, ( 3 Mass. R. 403 ,) which is cited with approbation in Beardsley v.

Baker v. Brown

19 N.Y.S. 258 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1892

Brown claims said sum as assignee of said Ditmar, and that, for the purpose of enforcing payment to him of said sum, he has caused to be issued out of the surrogate’s court an execution directed to the sheriff, etc., requiring … To this complaint the defendant Brown demurred, upon the ground that it appears upon the face of the complaint that it does not state facts sufficient to •constitute a cause of action.

Schrank v. Brown

192 Misc. 80 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1948

Where no power exists under the constitution of the union to act, the court will interfere in the first instance to enjoin an unwarranted exercise of power (Sullivan v. McFetridge, 183 Misc. 106 , affd. 268 App. … By letter dated April 14, 1948, defendant Brown purported to take over control of Lodge No. 402 and put it under the direction of his deputy, defendant Newman.

Brown v. Neely

197 Misc. 173 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1949

In Olney v. Culluloo Park Co. ( 182 App. … Kleinberg v. Ratett ( 252 N. Y. 236 ) is also cited; also Odell v. Nyack Water Works Co. ( 91 Hun 283 ).

Wheeler-Brown v. Brown

20 Misc. 3d 211 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 23, 2008

Protection of City of N.Y. v Department of Envtl. Conservation of State of N.Y., 70 NY2d 233 [1987].) … (Matter of Barclays Bank v Hughes, 306 AD2d 406 [2d Dept 2003].)

Dawley v. Brown

65 Barb. 107 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1873

Bank v. White, 2 Seld. 236; Edmeston v. Lyde, 1 Paige, 637 ; The Bank of U. S. v. Hauseman, 6 Peters, 536 .) … Bank v *126 White , and The same v. Risley, supra. In Walker v.

Brown v. Bullock

32 Misc. 2d 111 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1961

The plaintiffs have alleged a waste of the Fund’s assets; that the Fund’s investment adviser is paid substantial sums for practically no work; that the prominent men who serve on the Fund’s board of directors are “ dominated … (Van Aalten v. Mack, 9 A D 2d 648.) As a condition precedent to such discontinuance, notice shall be given to all stockholders of Dividend Shares, Inc., of this application.