Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.68s
Johnson v. Board of Supervisors
121 Misc. 315 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1923
Konner v. State of New York, 227 N. Y. 478 . … Fox v. Hawkins, 150 App. Div. 801 ; Carney v. Pendleton, 139 id. 152. A vendee cannot rescind a contract for the purchase of real estate and still continue in possession. Moore v. Smedburg, 8 Paige, 600 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Robinson
119 Misc. 496 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1922
Goldstein v. Curtis, 63 N. J. Eq. 454. No reason appears, so far as I can perceive, for placing a condemnation proceeding, in this regard, in a class distinct from mortgage foreclosure and specific performance actions. … Banfield Co. v. Hollenbeck, 184 App. Div. 618 . This being the situation, defendants’ contention that they did not have sufficient notice of the presentation of the petition is without avail.
Cited 0 timesPublished58 N.Y. St. Rep. 871 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1894
Cited 0 timesPublished103 Misc. 318 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1918
Border National Bank v. Coupland, 240 Fed. Repr. 355; Bankruptcy Act, § 47a, cl. 2. … Repr. 311; affd., 242 id. 251; Duplan Silk Co. v. Spencer, 115 id. 689.
Cited 0 timesPublished94 Misc. 453 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1916
The idea advanced in Eagan v. Board of Education, 115 N. Y. … See Matter of Hamburger v. Board of Education, 109 App. Div. 427 ; also Matter of Keymer, 148 N. Y. 219 ; People ex rel. Sweet v. Lyman, 157 id. 368 ; Buckbee v. Board of Education, 115 App. Div. 366 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedMahopac Teachers Ass'n v. Board of Education
67 Misc. 2d 268 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1971
(See our determination in North Salem Teachers Assn. v. Board of Educ., 67 Misc 2d 315 .) … Y. v. Board of Higher Educ. ( 67 Misc 2d 648 ). Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.
Cited 2 timesPublished51 Misc. 295 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1906
Steinson v. Board of Education, 165 N. Y. 431 . The element of the term of the contract is, therefore^ clear. … Callahan v. Board of Education, 174 N.
Cited 0 timesPublished50 Misc. 40 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1906
Sander v. State of New York, 182 N. Y. 400 . … Tice v. Atlantic Construction Co., 52 App. Div. 284 .
Cited 0 timesPublished43 Misc. 297 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1904
The board of health took no action but its chairman did take an active part. A board of health has nothing to do with a case of individual sickness but is- solicitous as to the public health. … The president of. the board of health, without the authority of the board, recognized the emergency and necessity for action, and perhaps by reason of the fact that the sheriff was not ready to commit himself or the county
Cited 0 timesPublishedCaroldee Realty Corp. v. Board of Assessors
73 Misc. 2d 41 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1972
Gale v. Tax. Comm, of City of N. Y., 17 A D 2d 225, 230; Woolworth Co. v. Commission of Taxation & Assessment of City of Plattsburgh, 26 A D 2d 759, 760). … (People ex rel. 379 Madison Ave. v. Boyland, 281 App. Div. 588 , supra; Matter of Dunn Garden Apts. v. Commissioner of Assessment & Taxation of City of Troy, 11 A D 2d 879.)
Cited 7 timesPublishedDel Rosso v. Board of Elections
22 Misc. 2d 99 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1959
The returns produced by the respondent Board of Elections show that in the 8th Election District, petitioner Muckey received 7 votes; that there was 1 void ballot; and that her opponent received 15 more votes than did Muckey
Cited 2 timesPublishedKokomo Straw Board Co. v. Sachs
62 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 604 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1889
Cited 0 timesPublishedCemetery Board v. Buffalo Cemetery Ass'n
67 Misc. 2d 949 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1971
The enforcement and administration of these restrictions fall within the jurisdiction and competence of the Cemetery Board, and it is the duty of the board to protect the public *952 interest in these statutory trust funds … In Bischoff v. Yorkville Bank ( 218 N.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPelham Jewish Center v. Board of Trustees
9 Misc. 2d 564 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1957
(Matter of Neddo v. Schrade, 270 N. Y. 97 ; Matter of Weers v. Whiton, 3 A D 2d 924.) … (Matter of Spano v. Close, 266 App. Div. 1023 ; see, also, Matter of Larkin Co. v. Schwab, 242 N. Y. 330 .)
Cited 8 timesPublished169 Misc. 628 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1938
Y. 355 ) and Myers v. Daley ( 236 App. … As the court said in Shotwell v. Dixon ( 163 N.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIngmire v. Board of Supervisors
161 Misc. 554 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1936
Sweet v. Board of Supervisors ( 101 App. Div. 327 ), where it was held that the cost of litigation by a town was not a proper charge against the county even though the board of supervisors assumed it by resolution. … Town of Hempstead v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedStampp v. Board of Supervisors
141 Misc. 487 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1931
Pending the return of the order to show cause, the defendants, the board of supervisors of the county of Cayuga and J. … (Lakes Island Realty Co. v. McDermott, 96 Misc. 37, at p. 41 ; Brower v. Williams, 44 App. Div. 337, at p. 340 ; Wormser v. Brown, 149 N. Y. 163, at p. 173 ; Floyd-Jones v. United Electric Light Co., 55 Misc. 529, 530.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedSpanhake v. Teachers' Retirement Board
131 Misc. 383 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1928
(Matter of Poucher v. Teachers’ Retirement Board, 130 Misc. 896 .) … Unless it was mailed or handed to a member of the Retirement Board before death, the fact that the application had been executed and that a member of the Board could not be located in time, is of no avail.
Cited 0 timesPublished128 Misc. 853 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1927
(Matter of Reif v. Schwab, 204 App. Div. 50 . See, also, People ex rel. Wells & Newton Co. v. Craig, 232 N. Y. 125 .) … The same rule undoubtedly applies to the board of education as an independent municipal corporation. (Smith v. Board of Education, 208 N. Y. 84 .)
Cited 0 timesPublishedGladstone v. Board of Education
202 Misc. 1005 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1952
(Matter of Gladstone v. Board of Educ., Andes Central School Dist. No. 2, 279 App. Div. 701 .) The granting of the order to file the claim in the first instance was a condition precedent to the bringing of the action. … Attention is called to the case of Matter of Moore v. City of New York ( 195 Misc. 976 , revd. 276 App. Div. 585 , revd. 302 N. Y. 563 ).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna