Case law

Carpenter v. Brown

6 Barb. 147 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1849

In Bowdell v. … In North v.

Hayes v. Brown

6 N.Y.S. 766 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1889

Harris v. Brown

36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 484 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1883

Hayes v. Brown

59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1889

Wygant v. Brown

62 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 608 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1890

Wormser v. Brown

80 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 615 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1893

Brown v. Lerow

2 Cow. 525 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1824

Burke v. Brown

180 Misc. 903 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1943

Reis Co. v. Post, 183 App. Div. 696 ). … (Chartered Bank of India v. Nassau Fire Ins. Co., 145 App. Div. 307 ; Losie v. Royal Ind. Co., 179 App. Div. 439 ; De Cordova v. Sanville, 171 App. Div. 422 .) Settle order.

Brown v. McMorran

39 Misc. 2d 716 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1963

Doolittle v. Supervisors of Broome County, 18 N. Y. 155 ; Schieffelin v. Komfort, 212 N. Y. 520, 530, 533 ; Headley v. City of Rochester, 272 N. Y. 197 ; Kipp v. Incorporated Vil. of Ardsley, 13 A D 2d 1012; Blumberg v. … Daley v. Rice, 129 N. Y. 449 ; Matter of McCabe v. Voorhis, 243 N. Y. 401 ).

Guidet v. Brown

54 How. Pr. 409 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1877

Brown, deceased. The parties were married in 1828. In 1855 an agreement was entered into between John L.-Brown, of the first part, Mary Ann Bro.wn, of the second part, and George Johnson, of the third part. … The conclusion reached is that there should be judgment for partition of the lands, but that Mary Ann Brown is endowed of the lands in question.

Aylesworth v. Brown

10 Barb. 167 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1850

Rice, v. Ransom, ( 2 Hill, 54 , 57, 58,) the affidavit was made on the 6th of April, one month and nineteen days before the 25th of May when it was presented for redemption. … In The People v.

Brown v. Brown

36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 498 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1883

(See Robinson v. Raynor, 28 N. Y., 494 ; Lisk v. Sherman, 25 Barb., 433 ; Bunton v. Smith, 40 N. H., 352; Smith v. Crandall, 20 Md., 482 ; Foot v. Webb, 59 Barb., 38 ; Ackerman v. Ackerman, Exr., 24 N. J. … Eq., 315; Twiss v. George, 33 Mich., 253 .) In Purcell v.

Dauchy v. Brown

41 Barb. 555 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1863

The only point decided in Watson v. Davis, ( 19 Wend. 371 ,) is that a judgment rendered by a justice after the four days given by statute for that purpose is erroneous ; and in Bissell v. … Sibley v.

Brown v. Upfold

204 Misc. 416 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1953

Brown, a passenger in the TTpfold automobile was injured. Dougherty sustained serious personal injuries and property damage. Dougherty filed a cross action against the defendant, TTpfold. … In Auchello v. Brooklyn Bus Corp. ( 257 App.

Brown v. Clifford

7 Lans. 46 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1872

(Hodges v. Tennessee Marine and Fire Ins. Company, 4 Seld., 416; Despard v. Walbridge, 15 N. Y., 374 -379; Vandusen v. Worrell, 8 Keyes, 311 ; Loveridge v. Oyer, cited by Hunt, J.; Sturtevant v. Sturtevant, 20 N. … If an agreement between Brown and defendant that the latter should advance moneys in addition to what he had already advanced to and for said Brown, and that Brown should execute and deliver a deed of said land as security

Brown v. Butler

12 N.Y.S. 810 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1890

Cronly v. Brown

12 Wend. 271 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1835

Brown v. Wilbur

8 Wend. 657 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1832

In the case of Denning v. Smith, 3 Johns. Ch. R. 332, Judson was the purchaser at the sale, under the statute, by the commissioners, and received a deed of the premises. … Cook et. al. v.

Brown v. Richter

27 N.Y.S. 1094 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1894

An examination of the case of Kennedy v. … In the case of Tilden v. Green a different question arose.

People v. Brown

40 Misc. 3d 821 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 26, 2013

(People v Bright, 71 NY2d 376, 382 [1988].) … When attempting to interpret a statute, courts are obliged to effectuate the legislative intent. (.People v Finnegan, 85 NY2d 53 [1995].)