Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

1.34s

  • Newton v. Board of Education

    52 Misc. 2d 259 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1966

    As to the accident report, defendant points out that it was prepared pursuant to routine accident procedures only, and not because some board of education rule or regulation so specified. … (Bloom v. New York City Tr. Auth., 20 A D 2d 687; Bresson v. Radio City Music Hall Corp., 23 A D 2d 581; Mosier v. Van Der Horst Research Corp., 25 A D 2d 938; Linton v. Lehigh Val. R. R. Co., 25 A D 2d 334; Davis v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Watson v. Board of Education

    91 Misc. 323 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1915

    This was under the schedule adopted by the board of education July 16, 1900, and taking effect May third of that year. … The law itself did this, and no resolution of the board could reduce them. For the purpose of preventing a .reduction this resolution of the board was entirely unnecessary.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Herzog v. Board of Education

    171 Misc. 2d 22 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1996

    School Dist., 41 NY2d 283, 287 [citing Board of Educ. v Allen, 20 NY2d 109 , affd 392 US 236 ])”. … (Matter of Mahon v Board of Educ., 171 NY 263 ; Local 456 Intl. Bhd. of Teamsters v Town of Cortlandt, 68 Misc 2d 645 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Alonso

    60 Misc. 2d 709 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1969

    to constitute the whole local school board. … It provides that “ The board of education of the city school district of the city of New York * * * shall divide the city school district into such number of local school board districts as such board in its discretion may

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dachs v. Board of Education

    53 Misc. 2d 13 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1967

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reed v. Board of Appeals

    51 Misc. 2d 88 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1966

    Since it is clear from the record before the board that petitioner is entitled to the permit for which he applied as a matter of right, the decision of the board is annulled and the matter is remanded to the board with directions … regulations of the use district in which it is situated ”, for the regulations of the use district deal not only with use in the strict sense but also with area requirements, (and see the reference in Matter of Faranda v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Health v. Noyes

    71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 634 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1892

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. Board of Supervisors

    52 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 588 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1887

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Supervisors v. Frean

    1 Thomp. & Cook 431 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1873

    The complaint charges the defendant with presenting claims to the board of supervisors of Richmond county, which were not legal claims against the county, were for services not rendered to the county, or for which the county … The complaint further charges that the defendant knew the claims were not legal, and fraudulently procured a warrant for payment of the same of the *433 board of supervisors.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wood v. Board of Supervisors

    17 N.Y.S. 603 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1891

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Purdy

    22 How. Pr. 506 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1862

    name of the board under the- provisions of the law. … If every one may prosecute in the name of the board, unless the board choose to object, the provision in respect to laying the complaint before the board, with reasonable proof of a violation of the law, is nullified and

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pumpelly v. Board of Trustees

    84 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1894

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Glennon

    28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 244 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1880

    of the town or city in which the alleged penalty was incurred, “ except in such towns or cities as have no overseers of the poor, in which case said penalties shall be sued for, and recovered* by and in the name of the Board … be paid into the city treasury.” ‘ Must the Commissioner of Charities sue for the penalty in question, or the Board of Excise ?

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eickelberg v. Board of Health

    54 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 371 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1888

    .: It is the duty of the boards of health organized in this State to designate the persons who shall grant burial permits for the burial of the dead, and transit permits for the transportation of dead bodies of persons which … The boards of health must designate persons who shall grant permits for the burial of the dead and transit permits.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Supervisors v. Seabury

    32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 564 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1881

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Supervisors v. Seabury

    33 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 393 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1882

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Seeley v. Board of Supervisors

    41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 636 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1885

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Birdsall v. Board of Supervisors

    42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 669 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1885

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shore v. Board of Supervisors

    2 N.Y. St. Rep. 317 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1886

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Baka v. Board of Education

    11 Misc. 2d 441 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1958

    Lucio v. … (Haskell v. Miller, 221 App. Div. 48, 49 , affd. 246 N. Y. 618 .) In determining the effect of a release, the basic inquiry is the intention of the parties and the purpose for which the release was given (Simon v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.