Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysupct

10,000+ results

1.20s

  • Reed v. Board of Appeals

    51 Misc. 2d 88 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1966

    Since it is clear from the record before the board that petitioner is entitled to the permit for which he applied as a matter of right, the decision of the board is annulled and the matter is remanded to the board with directions … regulations of the use district in which it is situated ”, for the regulations of the use district deal not only with use in the strict sense but also with area requirements, (and see the reference in Matter of Faranda v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. Board of Supervisors

    52 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 588 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1887

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Birdsall v. Board of Supervisors

    42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 669 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1885

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Supervisors v. Seabury

    33 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 393 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1882

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Seeley v. Board of Supervisors

    41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 636 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1885

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Health v. Noyes

    71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 634 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1892

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eickelberg v. Board of Health

    54 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 371 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1888

    .: It is the duty of the boards of health organized in this State to designate the persons who shall grant burial permits for the burial of the dead, and transit permits for the transportation of dead bodies of persons which … The boards of health must designate persons who shall grant permits for the burial of the dead and transit permits.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Glennon

    28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 244 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1880

    of the town or city in which the alleged penalty was incurred, “ except in such towns or cities as have no overseers of the poor, in which case said penalties shall be sued for, and recovered* by and in the name of the Board … be paid into the city treasury.” ‘ Must the Commissioner of Charities sue for the penalty in question, or the Board of Excise ?

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Supervisors v. Frean

    1 Thomp. & Cook 431 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1873

    The complaint charges the defendant with presenting claims to the board of supervisors of Richmond county, which were not legal claims against the county, were for services not rendered to the county, or for which the county … The complaint further charges that the defendant knew the claims were not legal, and fraudulently procured a warrant for payment of the same of the *433 board of supervisors.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shore v. Board of Supervisors

    2 N.Y. St. Rep. 317 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1886

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Supervisors v. Seabury

    32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 564 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1881

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pumpelly v. Board of Trustees

    84 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1894

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Purdy

    22 How. Pr. 506 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1862

    name of the board under the- provisions of the law. … If every one may prosecute in the name of the board, unless the board choose to object, the provision in respect to laying the complaint before the board, with reasonable proof of a violation of the law, is nullified and

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wood v. Board of Supervisors

    17 N.Y.S. 603 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1891

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Conetta v. Board of Education

    165 Misc. 2d 329 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1995

    (Matter of Kelland v Board of Educ. of State of N. Y, supra, at 981.) … Board of Coop.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lynch v. Board of Assessors

    163 Misc. 2d 703 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1994

    As stated by Justice Ingrassia in Cippolone v City of White Plains (NYLJ, July 8, 1991, at 27, cols 2, 3, affd sub nom. … (Matter of AT&T Information Systems v. Donohue, 113 AD2d *705 395, 400 .)” (Cippolone v City of White Plains, supra, at 27, col 3.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hines v. Board of Education

    170 Misc. 745 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1939

    (Citing Lessin v. Board of Education, 247 N. Y. 503 .) Section 578 is a part of article 20-B of the Education Law and has to do with children of retarded mental development. … (Johnson v. Board of Education, 210 App. Div. 723, 727 ; Katterschinsky v. Board of Education, 215 id. 695; Garber v. Central School District No. 1 , 251 id. 214 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Swiderski v. Board of Education

    95 Misc. 2d 931 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1978

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gerling v. Board of Zoning Appeals

    11 Misc. 2d 84 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1957

    Board of Appeals, 301 N. Y. 215 ; Y. W. H. Assn. v. Board of Standards and Appeals, 266 N. Y. 270 ; Matter of Clark v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 301 N. Y. 86 ; Matter of Hickox v. Griffin, 298 N. … Y. 365 ; Matter of Freitag v. *92 Marsh, 280 App. Div. 934 ; Matter of North Titus Residential Assn. v. Board of Appeals, 205 Misc. 518 ; Matter of Stillman v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 222 App.

    Reversed on other grounds by Gerling v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 6 A.D.2d 247 (1958)Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Kesselring v. Board of Elections

    68 Misc. 2d 28 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1971

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.