Case law

Reiner v. Board of Elections

54 Misc. 2d 1030 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1967

Petitioners move this court for an order directing the Inspectors of Election and the Board of Elections of Onondaga County to add their names to the register of voters of the First District of the Sixteenth Ward of the City … It is this court’s opinion that the case of Matter of Robbins v. Chamberlain ( 297 N. Y. 108 ) is controlling.

Board of Health v. Valentine

11 N.Y.S. 112 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1890

It seems too plain for argument that this action was well brought in the name of the board, without naming the individual members thereof Board v. Casey, 3 N. Y. Supp. 399 . The case Gould v. City of Rochester, 12 N. E. … Moody v. Mayor, 43 Barb. 282 ; Cheetham v. Hampson, 4 Term R. 318; Rosewell v. Prior, 2 Salk. 460, fully reported in 1 Ld. Raym. 392,713.

Brown v. New York Evening Journal, Inc.

143 Misc. 199 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1932

In Ben-Oliel v. Press Pub. Co. ( 251 N. … {Sullivan v. Daily Mirror, Inc., supra, 510.)

Kelly v. Board of Education

8 Misc. 2d 1007 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1957

As the court stated in Ward v. Hudson Biv. Bldg. co. … As it was further stated in Mohrmann v.

Guggenheimer v. Beaver Board Companies

136 Misc. 511 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1930

Co. v. Gold Issue Mining Co., 243 U. S. 93 ; Bagdon v. Phila. & R. C. & I. Co., 217 N. Y. 432 ; distinguishing Old Wayne M. L. Assn. v. McDonough, 204 U. S. 8 , and Simon v. Southern Ry. Co., 236 U. S. 115 ; Tauza v. … Y. 259 ; Reynolds v. Miss., K. & T. Ry. Co., 228 Mass. 584 ; and cf. Barrow S. S. Co. v. Kane, 170 U. S. 100 ; Phila. & Reading Ry. Co. v. McKibbin, 243 id. 264, 268; Mitchell Furniture Co. v.

Scro v. Board of Education

31 Misc. 3d 1029 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 20, 2011

(See Staniszewski v Lackawanna Mun. Hous. Auth., 191 AD2d 1048 [4th Dept 1993].) … (See Matter of Comins v County of Delaware, 73 AD2d 698 [3d Dept 1979].)

Smyth v. Board of Education

128 Misc. 49 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 1, 1925

(Matter of Berkovitz v. Arbib & Houlberg, 230 N. Y. 261, 272, 275 .) Of like purport are the decisions holding that it is for the arbitrators to construe the submission and determine its scope. … Div. 206 ; Itoh & Co., Ltd., v. Boyer Oil Co., Inc., 198 id. 881.) The motion is denied.

Sigman v. Board of Education

198 Misc. 306 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1950

(Matter of Martin v. School Bd. of Union Free Dist. No. 28, Long Beach, 275 App. Div. 1042 [2d Dept.], leave to appeal granted 276 App. Div. 763 ; Matter of Ennis v. City of Peekskill, 276 App. … .]; Matter of Gardiner v. Board of Educ. Union Free School Dist. No. 3, Town of Huntington, 276 App. Div. 977 [decided Feb. 20,1950].)

Doe v. Board of Health

5 Misc. 3d 424 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 19, 2004

(See, e.g., Matter of Andres A. v Judith N, 156 Misc 2d 65 [1992], supra.) … (Accord Arredondo v Nodelman, 163 Misc 2d 757 [Sup Ct, Queens County 1994].)

Burns v. Board of Elections

9 Misc. 2d 360 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 20, 1957

(See City of Compton v. Adams, 33 Cal. 2d, 596 .) The special census taken unquestionably is the latest Federal census. … (See City of Compton v. Adams, supra.)

Gavin v. Board of Supervisors

93 Misc. 264 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1916

Smart v. Board of Supervisors, 66 App. Div. 66 ; People ex rel. Nash v. Board of Supervisors , 164 id. 89 . … The plaintiff cites Matter of Chapman v. City of New York, 168 N.

Board of Education v. Allen

6 Misc. 2d 453 · New York Supreme Court · May 20, 1957

Board of Educ. v. Graves, 243 N. Y. 204 ; Barringer v. Powell, 230 N. Y. 37 ; Bullock v. Cooley, 225 N. Y. 566 ; Matter of Hauser v. Wilson , 2 A D 2d 427; Matter of Beam v. Wilson, 279 App. … Div. 277 ; Matter of Craig v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 262 App. Div. 706 ; Matter of Fabricius v. Graves, 254 App. Div. 19 , reargument denied 254 App. Div. 913 ; Matter of Cochran v.

Fitzpatrick v. Board of Education

69 Misc. 78 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1910

The board of superintendents of the schools of New York city recommended the appointment of Goldwasser to the position above referred to and the committee on elementary schools reported favor *79 ably to the board of education … In Schlivinski v. Maxwell, 80 App.

Hopkins v. Board of Education

99 Misc. 2d 216 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1979

Realty Corp. v Larkin, 11 NY2d 20 ; Conley v Town of Brookhaven Zoning Bd., 40 NY2d 309 ). … It is quite clear that the board of education of a central school district has the legal authority to close a school when the need exists (Glover v Board of Educ., 7 AD2d 319 ).

Botwin v. Board of Education

114 Misc. 2d 291 · New York Supreme Court · May 17, 1982

(Matter of Wilson v Macchiarola, 79 AD2d 638 ; Matter of O’Connor v Emerson, 196 App Div 807 , affd 232 NY 561 ; Board of Educ. v Rickard, 32 AD2d 135 ; Matter of Tombler v Board of Educ., 109 Misc 2d 821 .) … 409 , affd 45 NY2d 947 ), Devitt v Heimbach ( 109 Misc 2d 463 ) and Matter of Sanna v Lindenhurst Board of Educ. ( 107 Misc 2d 267 , mod 85 AD2d 157 ).

Slater v. Board of Supervisors

66 Misc. 2d 108 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1971

(Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533 ; Iannucci v. Board of Supervisors, 20 NY 2d 244 .) … (Town of Carmel v. Board of Supervisors of Putnam County, 27 N Y 2d 975.) The 1970 figures for the towns shall be used for necessary computation.

Cohen v. Brown, Harris Stevens, Inc.

132 Misc. 2d 85 · New York Supreme Court · May 23, 1986

This is a restatement of the hoary rule set out in Hadley v Baxendale (9 Exch 341, 156 Eng Rep 145). … The plaintiffs’ assertion that the doctrine of Hadley v Baxendale (supra) is incorporated within the definition of use and occupancy is correct.

Ferraro v. Board of Education

32 Misc. 2d 563 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1961

In Ohman v. Board of Educ. … In Selleck v. Board of Educ.

Moses v. Board of Education

127 Misc. 477 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1926

In Teece v. Board of Education (27 State Dept. … (Clark v. State of New York, 142 N. Y. 101 ; Kehn v. State of New York , 93 id. 291; O’Connor v. City of New York, 178 App. Div. 550 ; Moore v. Board of Education , 121 id. 862; Loewy v.

Irwin v. Board of Regents

53 Misc. 2d 430 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1967

The respondent, the Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York, has served an answer containing objections in point of law and has taken the position upon this proceeding that the petition should be dismissed … Hurwitz v. North, 271 U. S. 40 .) The court, then is persuaded to the position that the denial of the requests for subpoenas by subject hearing body was illegal.