Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysd

10,000+ results

2.97s

  • Brown v. The Columbia

    29 F. 716 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 31, 1887

    Brown, J. At about half past 1 in the afternoon of February 12, 1886, as the canal-boat Mary Brown, loaded with coal, was going up the East river, in tow of the steam-tug B. H. … Rep. 457; Cayzer v. Carron Co., 9 App. Cas. 873.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Panteleo v. Brown

    53 F. Supp. 209 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 6, 1943

    Wilemon v. Brown, D.C.N.D.Tex., September 29, 1943, 51 F.Supp. 978 , and B. Simon Hdw. Co. v. … Judge Lovett in Perkins v. Brown, D.C.S.D.Ga., November 15, 1943, 53 F.Supp. 176 , held it valid and denied an injunction. I agree with the latter view.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. De Filippis

    125 F.R.D. 83 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 11, 1989

    Lane, 528 F.Supp. 1254, 1265 (N.D.Ill.1981), Barcelo v. Brown, 655 F.2d 458, 462 (1st Cir.1981). This is not the equivalent of a full waiver of fees however. … See United States Marshall Service v. Means, 724 F.2d 642 (8th Cir.1983). In McNeil v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Fire Ass'n

    1 F.R.D. 450 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 16, 1940

    See Brockway Glass Co., Inc. v. Hartford Empire Co., D.C.W.D.N.Y. May 1940, 1 F.R.D. 242 . Mr. … I have also read Judge Hulbert’s opinion in the case of Prutinsky v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Fletcher

    203 F. 70 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 20, 1912

    I think that that judgment in the New Yoik Suprenxe Court is immaterial in this case because the complainants Brown axid Schennexdiorn were not made parties to that action, and are not bound by the judgment rendered in it … This objection is highly technical, and is, in my opinion, of doubtful validity under the New York authorities (Kennedy v. Arthur [Sup.] 11 N. Y. Supp. 661 ; Matter of Field, 131 N. Y. 184 , 30 N. E. 48 ; Sabin v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    404 F. Supp. 968 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 6, 1975

    Brown (Brown) and United States Telephone Company of imported merchandise under false and fraudulent invoices. 1 The defendants were previously convicted of a violation of Title 18, United States Code with respect to 36 entries … Certainly Brown knew who the manufacturer seller was but apparently did not choose to have that revealed.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Rodriguez v. Atria Senior Living Group, Inc.

    887 F. Supp. 2d 503 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 13, 2012

    See Weixel v. Board of Educ. of City of New York, 287 F.3d 138, 149 (2d Cir.2002). … Rags-dale v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Brown v. The Allianca

    63 F. 726 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 16, 1894

    Brown v. Gray, 70 Hun, 261 , 24 N. Y. Supp. 61 . … No. 7,196; Id., 9 Wall. 758 ; The Kalorama, 10 Wall. 204 ; The Patapsco, 13 Wall. 329 ; The Union Express, Brown, Adm. 538 , Fed. Cas. No. 14,364; Thomas v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • IN RE DIDI GLOBAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

    District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 2, 2025

    Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Sunny Merchandise Corp., 97 F. … Brown Prods., Ltd. v. Home Box Office, Inc., 26 F. Supp. 2d 606, 614 (S.D.N.Y. 1998)), and applying Lugosch).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kitsakos v. Brown

    848 F. Supp. 459 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 16, 1994

    See Burkart v. Post-Browning, Inc., 859 F.2d 1245, 1247 (6th Cir.1988). … See Burkart v. Post-Browning, Inc., 859 F.2d 1245, 1248-50 (6th Cir.1988). Further, there is no other evidence to support plaintiffs position that he was terminated as a result of his military leave.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    188 F. Supp. 624 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 10, 1960

    See United States v. Fassoulis, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1959, 179 F.Supp. 645 . Cf. United States v. Lustman, 2 Cir., 258 F.2d 475 , certiorari denied, 1958, 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 . 7 . See United States v. … Von Moltke v. Gillies, 1948, 332 U.S. 708, 723-724 , 68 S.Ct. 316 , 92 L.Ed. 309 ; Glasser v. United States, 1942, 315 U.S. 60, 70 , 62 S.Ct. 457 , 86 L.Ed. 680 ; Johnson v. Zerbst, 1938, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Eschenasy v. New York City Department of Education

    604 F. Supp. 2d 639 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 25, 2009

    The Second Circuit has stated that parents “may not be subject to the same mainstreaming requirements as a school board.” M.S. ex rel S.S. v. Bd. of Educ. of Yonkers, 231 F.3d 96, 105 (2d Cir.2000). … It is well settled that “[t]he Board of Education of the City of New York is not a department of the city government, it is an independent corporate body and may sue and be sued in its corporate name.” Divisich v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hutton Group

    795 F. Supp. 1317 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 10, 1992

    See Brown v. E.F. Hutton Group, 735 F.Supp. 1196 (S.D.N.Y.1990). 3 . … See Brown v. Hutton Group, 775 F.Supp. 692, 695 (S.D.N.Y.1991). The Court applied Lampf retroactively pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in James B. Beam Distilling Co. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hutton Group

    795 F. Supp. 1307 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 27, 1992

    Brown, et al., pursuant to Section 476 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, Pub.L. … See Brown v. Hutton Group, 775 F.Supp. 692, 695 (S.D.N.Y.1991). The Court applied Lampf retroactively pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in James B. Beam Distilling Co. v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Cohen v. Board of Education of East Ramapo Central School District

    536 F. Supp. 486 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 31, 1982

    Defendant cites Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478 , 100 S.Ct. 1790 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980), and Walker v. … Board of Regents v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Salcedo v. Artuz

    107 F. Supp. 2d 405 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 2, 2000

    Moreover, the standard set forth in Williams abrogates the de novo review that was required under Brown v. … See Salcedo, 92 N.Y.2d at 1021-22 , 684 N.Y.S.2d 480 , 707 N.E.2d 435 ; Salcedo, 666 N.Y.S.2d at 174 (citing People v. Brown, 80 N.Y.2d 361 , 590 N.Y.S.2d 422 , 604 N.E.2d 1353 (1992)).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    458 F. Supp. 182 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 16, 1978

    Brown v. United States, No. 77-2148 (2d Cir. June 12, 1978) (remand order). Upon further briefing and consideration of the point, the Court substantially denies the petition. I. … Following Heflin v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    637 F. Supp. 2d 212 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 28, 2009

    No. 1: Brown Br. at 6-7.) … Rody's mentioning at sentencing that a murder was committed at Brown's stash house. (08 Civ. 8804, Dkt. No. 1: Brown Br. at 13, 15.) 2 . Accord, e.g., United States v. Salcido-Contreras, 990 F.2d 51, 53 (2d Cir.)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    462 F. Supp. 184 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 29, 1978

    United States v. Neal (2d Cir. 1976) 536 F.2d 533 , 534 cert. denied 429 U.S. 857 , 97 S.Ct. 155 , 50 L.Ed.2d 134 ; United States v. … United States v. Estepa (2d Cir. 1972) 471 F.2d 1132, 1137 .

    Reversed on other grounds by United States v. Charles F. Brown, 602 F.2d 1073 (1979)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Benton v. Brown

    537 F. Supp. 2d 584 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 10, 2008

    Capellan v. Riley, 975 F.2d 67, 70 (2d Cir.1992). … See Truesdale v. Sabourin, 427 F.Supp.2d 451, 458 (S.D.N.Y.2006); see also Tankleff v. Senkowski, 135 F.3d 235, 249 (2d Cir.1998).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.