Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.97s
29 F. 716 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 31, 1887
Brown, J. At about half past 1 in the afternoon of February 12, 1886, as the canal-boat Mary Brown, loaded with coal, was going up the East river, in tow of the steam-tug B. H. … Rep. 457; Cayzer v. Carron Co., 9 App. Cas. 873.
Cited 8 timesPublished53 F. Supp. 209 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 6, 1943
Wilemon v. Brown, D.C.N.D.Tex., September 29, 1943, 51 F.Supp. 978 , and B. Simon Hdw. Co. v. … Judge Lovett in Perkins v. Brown, D.C.S.D.Ga., November 15, 1943, 53 F.Supp. 176 , held it valid and denied an injunction. I agree with the latter view.
Cited 1 timesPublished125 F.R.D. 83 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 11, 1989
Lane, 528 F.Supp. 1254, 1265 (N.D.Ill.1981), Barcelo v. Brown, 655 F.2d 458, 462 (1st Cir.1981). This is not the equivalent of a full waiver of fees however. … See United States Marshall Service v. Means, 724 F.2d 642 (8th Cir.1983). In McNeil v.
Cited 4 timesPublished1 F.R.D. 450 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 16, 1940
See Brockway Glass Co., Inc. v. Hartford Empire Co., D.C.W.D.N.Y. May 1940, 1 F.R.D. 242 . Mr. … I have also read Judge Hulbert’s opinion in the case of Prutinsky v.
Cited 5 timesPublished203 F. 70 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 20, 1912
I think that that judgment in the New Yoik Suprenxe Court is immaterial in this case because the complainants Brown axid Schennexdiorn were not made parties to that action, and are not bound by the judgment rendered in it … This objection is highly technical, and is, in my opinion, of doubtful validity under the New York authorities (Kennedy v. Arthur [Sup.] 11 N. Y. Supp. 661 ; Matter of Field, 131 N. Y. 184 , 30 N. E. 48 ; Sabin v.
Cited 1 timesPublished404 F. Supp. 968 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 6, 1975
Brown (Brown) and United States Telephone Company of imported merchandise under false and fraudulent invoices. 1 The defendants were previously convicted of a violation of Title 18, United States Code with respect to 36 entries … Certainly Brown knew who the manufacturer seller was but apparently did not choose to have that revealed.
Cited 7 timesPublishedRodriguez v. Atria Senior Living Group, Inc.
887 F. Supp. 2d 503 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 13, 2012
See Weixel v. Board of Educ. of City of New York, 287 F.3d 138, 149 (2d Cir.2002). … Rags-dale v.
Cited 30 timesPublished63 F. 726 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 16, 1894
Brown v. Gray, 70 Hun, 261 , 24 N. Y. Supp. 61 . … No. 7,196; Id., 9 Wall. 758 ; The Kalorama, 10 Wall. 204 ; The Patapsco, 13 Wall. 329 ; The Union Express, Brown, Adm. 538 , Fed. Cas. No. 14,364; Thomas v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedIN RE DIDI GLOBAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 2, 2025
Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Sunny Merchandise Corp., 97 F. … Brown Prods., Ltd. v. Home Box Office, Inc., 26 F. Supp. 2d 606, 614 (S.D.N.Y. 1998)), and applying Lugosch).
Cited 0 timesUnknown848 F. Supp. 459 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 16, 1994
See Burkart v. Post-Browning, Inc., 859 F.2d 1245, 1247 (6th Cir.1988). … See Burkart v. Post-Browning, Inc., 859 F.2d 1245, 1248-50 (6th Cir.1988). Further, there is no other evidence to support plaintiffs position that he was terminated as a result of his military leave.
Cited 0 timesPublished188 F. Supp. 624 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 10, 1960
See United States v. Fassoulis, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1959, 179 F.Supp. 645 . Cf. United States v. Lustman, 2 Cir., 258 F.2d 475 , certiorari denied, 1958, 358 U.S. 880 , 79 S.Ct. 118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 109 . 7 . See United States v. … Von Moltke v. Gillies, 1948, 332 U.S. 708, 723-724 , 68 S.Ct. 316 , 92 L.Ed. 309 ; Glasser v. United States, 1942, 315 U.S. 60, 70 , 62 S.Ct. 457 , 86 L.Ed. 680 ; Johnson v. Zerbst, 1938, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.
Cited 7 timesPublishedEschenasy v. New York City Department of Education
604 F. Supp. 2d 639 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 25, 2009
The Second Circuit has stated that parents “may not be subject to the same mainstreaming requirements as a school board.” M.S. ex rel S.S. v. Bd. of Educ. of Yonkers, 231 F.3d 96, 105 (2d Cir.2000). … It is well settled that “[t]he Board of Education of the City of New York is not a department of the city government, it is an independent corporate body and may sue and be sued in its corporate name.” Divisich v.
Cited 13 timesPublished795 F. Supp. 1317 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 10, 1992
See Brown v. E.F. Hutton Group, 735 F.Supp. 1196 (S.D.N.Y.1990). 3 . … See Brown v. Hutton Group, 775 F.Supp. 692, 695 (S.D.N.Y.1991). The Court applied Lampf retroactively pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in James B. Beam Distilling Co. v.
Cited 15 timesPublished795 F. Supp. 1307 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 27, 1992
Brown, et al., pursuant to Section 476 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, Pub.L. … See Brown v. Hutton Group, 775 F.Supp. 692, 695 (S.D.N.Y.1991). The Court applied Lampf retroactively pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in James B. Beam Distilling Co. v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedCohen v. Board of Education of East Ramapo Central School District
536 F. Supp. 486 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 31, 1982
Defendant cites Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478 , 100 S.Ct. 1790 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980), and Walker v. … Board of Regents v.
Cited 17 timesPublished107 F. Supp. 2d 405 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 2, 2000
Moreover, the standard set forth in Williams abrogates the de novo review that was required under Brown v. … See Salcedo, 92 N.Y.2d at 1021-22 , 684 N.Y.S.2d 480 , 707 N.E.2d 435 ; Salcedo, 666 N.Y.S.2d at 174 (citing People v. Brown, 80 N.Y.2d 361 , 590 N.Y.S.2d 422 , 604 N.E.2d 1353 (1992)).
Cited 11 timesPublished458 F. Supp. 182 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 16, 1978
Brown v. United States, No. 77-2148 (2d Cir. June 12, 1978) (remand order). Upon further briefing and consideration of the point, the Court substantially denies the petition. I. … Following Heflin v.
Cited 2 timesPublished637 F. Supp. 2d 212 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 28, 2009
No. 1: Brown Br. at 6-7.) … Rody's mentioning at sentencing that a murder was committed at Brown's stash house. (08 Civ. 8804, Dkt. No. 1: Brown Br. at 13, 15.) 2 . Accord, e.g., United States v. Salcido-Contreras, 990 F.2d 51, 53 (2d Cir.)
Cited 5 timesPublished462 F. Supp. 184 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 29, 1978
United States v. Neal (2d Cir. 1976) 536 F.2d 533 , 534 cert. denied 429 U.S. 857 , 97 S.Ct. 155 , 50 L.Ed.2d 134 ; United States v. … United States v. Estepa (2d Cir. 1972) 471 F.2d 1132, 1137 .
Reversed on other grounds by United States v. Charles F. Brown, 602 F.2d 1073 (1979)Cited 5 timesPublished537 F. Supp. 2d 584 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 10, 2008
Capellan v. Riley, 975 F.2d 67, 70 (2d Cir.1992). … See Truesdale v. Sabourin, 427 F.Supp.2d 451, 458 (S.D.N.Y.2006); see also Tankleff v. Senkowski, 135 F.3d 235, 249 (2d Cir.1998).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna