Case law

Schwartz v. Brown

857 F. Supp. 291 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 30, 1994

Schwartz apparently took Commissioner Koshetz’s advice as he duly submitted his written objections to the Decision to Commissioner Brown, pursuant to Fogel v. … The Gargiul Court applied the rational relation test to determine the Board’s actions were not rationally related to a “proper governmental purpose.” Gargiul, 704 F.2d at 668 (citing Koch v.

Villalobos v. Captain Smith

District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 12, 2022

Gonzalez v. City of New York, 94CIV.7377 (SHS), 1996 WL 227824, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. May 3, 1996) (brackets omitted) (citing De Gradi v. Coney Island Med. Grp., P.C., 172 A.D.2d 582, 583 (2d Dep’t 1991) and Norr v. … Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 138 n.1 (1984)).

Brown v. Molle Co.

20 F. Supp. 135 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 16, 1937

On April 30, 1934, Brown undertook to copyright the song. Pie sent to the Copyright Office a manuscript of the song, with the heading “Lyrics by Sedley Brown, Music by E. L. … Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co., 188 U.S. 239 , 23 S.Ct. 298 , 47 L.Ed. 460 ; United States Ozone Co. v. United States Ozone Co., 62 F.(2d) 881 (C.C.A.7). The bill will be dismissed.

Johnston v. Brown

300 F. 737 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 26, 1924

John Crosby Brown, George Coppell, J. … Brown chairman, and Messrs. Brown Bros. & Co. depository. Counsel to the committee were appointed.

Brown v. Yeats

48 F. 115 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 3, 1891

Brown, J. The libelants, as ship-brokers, effected in behalf of the respondents a charter of their ship the Alex.

Brown v. Salisbury

123 F. 203 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 27, 1903

Brown v. Wilmot

443 F. Supp. 118 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 13, 1977

Tuthill v. … Walker v. Twomey, 484 F.2d 874, 876 (7th Cir. 1973) (per curiam); Natal v. People of Puerto Rico, 424 F.Supp. 1082, 1085 (D.P.R.1975); United States ex rel. Kane v. Bensinger, 359 F.Supp. 181, 183 (N.D.Ill.1972).

Mowatt v. Brown

17 F. Cas. 929 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 28, 1848

He entered on board in a disordered state of body, and never regained his health and strength in the five months the vessel was absent, so as to be able to perform his duty on board.

Anderson v. Brown

1 F. Cas. 840 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 1, 1851

Brown v. Pond

5 F. 41 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 15, 1880

Brown v. Church

5 F. 41 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 15, 1880

The requisites of the notice on the summons, in order to be in substantial compliance with the statute of New York, are fully considered in the case of Brown v.

Brown v. Burrows

4 F. Cas. 359 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 5, 1837

Froyman v. Brown

35 F.R.D. 511 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 27, 1964

Brown v. Hartley

4 F. Cas. 383 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 5, 1851

three months’ wages; nor was the consent of a consul or commercial agent to his discharge necessary, in order to render it valid. (3) That the libellant has been paid, by the defendant, in full, all the wages earned on board

Brown v. Fletcher

244 F. 854 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 20, 1917

Supp. 774 , and Brown v. Robinson, 173 App. Div. 583 , 160 N. Y. Supp. 287 . At the time this loan was secured Braker was in a fit condition for imposition. … Miller v. Zeimer, 111 N. Y. 441 , 18 N. E. 716 ; Thompson v. Berry, 3 Johns. Ch. 395 .

United States v. Brown

274 F. Supp. 561 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 18, 1967

A Quantity of Copies of Books, supra; Marcus, supra; Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown, 354 U.S. 436 , 77 S.Ct. 1325 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1469 (1957). … These guidelines first appeared in Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown, supra. In Kingsley, the Supreme Court upheld New York’s civil anti-obscenity procedure against an attack based on First Amendment principles.

Brown v. Fletcher

239 F. 360 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 15, 1917

In the case of Byrd v. Badger, 1 McAl. 443 , Fed. Cas.

Brown v. Smith

470 F. Supp. 131 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 24, 1979

Konigsberg v. Vincent (2d Cir. 1975) 526 F.2d 131 ; United States v. Rosenthal (2d Cir. 1972) 470 F.2d 837 . … The decisions in United States v. Rosenthal, supra, and United States ex rel. Konigsberg v. Vincent, supra, upon which respondent relies, do not support respondent’s position.

United States v. Brown

389 F. Supp. 959 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 24, 1975

Defendants James Philips and James Brown joined in a motion pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b) (2) prior to trial to r- dismiss the indictment against them on the basis of the decision of Judge Werker in United States v. … See, e. g., United States v. Powell, 81 F.Supp. 288 (E.D.Mo.1948); United States v. Amazon Industrial Chemical Corp., 55 F.2d 254 (D.Md. 1931); United States v. Huston, 28 F.2d 451 (N.D.Ohio 1928); United States v.

Brown v. Coughlin

704 F. Supp. 41 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 4, 1989

While Brown was serving his city sentence, the New York State Parole Board *43 held a parole revocation hearing. … the state Parole Board and Sullivan, individually.