Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.23s
District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 12, 2021
Now defendant Brown again challenges his sentence. … See Torres v. Senkowski, 316 F.3d 147, 151 (2d Cir. 2003).
Cited 0 timesUnknownA.D. v. Board of Education of the City School District
690 F. Supp. 2d 193 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 9, 2010
S.S. v. … In reaching this decision, the IHO concluded that the standard set forth in Board of *204 Education v.
Cited 28 timesPublished265 F. Supp. 2d 363 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 20, 2003
In fact, the Court, as Manley acknowledges, relied upon this Court’s decision in Brown v. Thomas, No. 02 Civ. 9257, 2003 WL 941940 (S.D.N.Y. … Apr.30, 2003); Davis v. Thomas, 256 F.Supp.2d 190 (S.D.N.Y.2003); Brown, 2003 WL 941940 ; Defino v. Thomas, No. 02 Civ. 7413, 2003 WL 40502 (S.D.N.Y. Jan.2, 2003); Lowery v. Thomas, 03 Civ. 0362, slip op. (S.D.N.Y.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Apr 1, 2021
(citing Chang v. … See Coppedge v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSecurities & Exchange Commission v. American Board of Trade, Inc.
645 F. Supp. 1055 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 8, 1986
This criminal and civil contempt proceeding arises out of a civil action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) against the American Board of Trade, Inc. … (“ABT”), Arthur Economou, Phyllis Economou, and the American Board of Trade Service Corp. (“ABTS”) to enjoin the sale of unregistered commercial paper by the defendants.
Cited 2 timesPublishedAlcan Aluminum Ltd. v. Franchise Tax Board of California
558 F. Supp. 624 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 4, 1983
Alcan Aluminum Limited v. The Franchise Tax Board of the State of California, 539 F.Supp. 512 (1982). In this opinion, we address the issue of whether plaintiff has standing to bring this action. … Max Factor & Co. v. Franchise Tax Board of California, 35 Cal.App.3d 7, 9 , 110 Cal.Rptr. 536, 537 (1973).
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Mar 15, 2021
See, e.g., Brown v. USA, ECF 1:21-CV-1146, 4 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 11, 2021) (dismissed as frivolous); Brown v. Winfrey, ECF 1:18-CV-10242, 4 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2019) (same); Brown v. USA, ECF 1:18-CV-5503, 4 (S.D.N.Y. … July 16, 2018) (same); Brown v. Hampton, ECF 1:17-CV-8166, 7 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2017) (dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Mar 13, 2021
Corp. v. … This conclusion does not affect Leon Brown’s standing. 3.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAllendale Nursing Home, Inc. v. Local 1115 Joint Board
377 F. Supp. 1208 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 13, 1974
See, United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp., 363 U.S. 593 , 80 S.Ct. 1358 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1424 (1960); Holly Sugar Corp. v. … Erving v. Virginia Squires Basketball Club, 468 F.2d 1064, 1069 (2d Cir. 1972); Pietro Scalzitti Co. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 150, 351 F.2d 576 (7th Cir. 1965); Signal Stat. Corp. v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedBaring Industries, Inc. v. 3 BP Property Owner LLC
District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 15, 2022
See, e.g., Nadel v. Shinseki, 57 F. Supp. 3d 288, 293 n.6 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (discrediting “legal conclusions [and] conclusory allegations contained in” the plaintiff’s declaration (citing Brown v. … See P-CDMF ¶ 8; Hick v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGulino v. Board of Education of the City School District
907 F. Supp. 2d 492 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 5, 2012
The Court conclusively rejects the Board’s business necessity argument. Finally, the Board argues that the Supreme Court’s decision in Ricci v. DeStefano, as interpreted by the Second Circuit in United States v. … See Briscoe v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedYaselli v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.
298 F. 198 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 7, 1924
Hoos v. Jamieson, 166 U. S. 395 , 17 Sup. Ct. 596, 41 L. Ed. 1049 ; Barney v. Baltimore, 6 Wall. 280 , 18 L. Ed. 825 . … Union Timber Product Co. v. Emergency Fleet Corp., 252 Fed. 320 ; Ingram Day Lumber Co. v. Emergency Fleet Corp., 267 Fed. 283 ; Harry Porter Co. v. Emergency Fleet Corp., 284 Fed. 397 (D. C. S. D. N. Y. per A. N.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSmith v. New York City Board of Education
918 F. Supp. 120 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 6, 1996
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 , 92 S.Ct. 594 , 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972); LaBounty v. Adler, 933 F.2d 121, 122 (2d Cir.1991). … See Rivers v. Roadway Exp., Inc., — U.S. -, -, 114 S.Ct. 1510, 1513 , 128 L.Ed.2d 274 (1994); see also Butts v. City of New York Dep’t of Housing Preservation and Dev., 990 F.2d 1397 (2d Cir.1993); Wrensen v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Dec 3, 2020
See United States v. Brown, ECF 7:14-CR-00509-1, 72 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. … See United States v. Brown, 18-434 (2d Cir. Sept. 6, 2019) (citing Dean v. United States, 137 S.
Cited 0 timesUnknownTomlins v. Village of Wappinger Falls Zoning Board of Appeals
812 F. Supp. 2d 357 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 8, 2011
The discretion of zoning boards of appeals in granting or denying variances from zoning codes is well-settled. See, e.g., Lamar Adver. of Penn. LLC v. … Ifrah v.
Cited 40 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Sep 30, 2020
v. … Plaintiff Shamone Brown consents to this request.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSecurities & Exchange Commission v. American Board of Trade, Inc.
750 F. Supp. 100 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 26, 1990
S.E.C. v. American Board of Trade, Inc., 798 F.2d 45, 46-47 (2d Cir.1986). … S.E.C. v. American Board of Trade, Inc., 751 F.2d 529, 531 (2d Cir.1984).
Cited 11 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Jul 10, 2020
Selian v. Astrue, 708 F.3d 409, 417 (2d Cir. 2013) (per curiam) (quoting Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971)). … King v. Greiner, No. 02-CV-5810, 2009 WL 2001439, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. July 8, 2009) (citation omitted); see also Wilds v. United Parcel Serv. Inc., 262 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Aug 26, 2025
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MAXINE BROWN, … Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).
Cited 0 timesUnknown37 F. Supp. 881 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 28, 1940
In this second suit one Vere Brown was the first of the individual defendants named therein, and this will be referred to as the “Brown” suit. … Pollitz v.
Cited 12 timesPublished
Ask Donna