Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysd

10,000+ results

0.96s

  • Caproni Brown v. Kijakazi

    District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 29, 2023

    See, e.g., Ortiz v. Barkley, 558 F. Supp. 2d 444, 451 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). … See Frank v. Johnson, 968 F.2d 298, 300 (2d Cir. 1992); see also Caidor v. Onondaga County, 517 F.3d 601 (2d Cir. 2008).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Itzcovitz v. SELECTIVE SERVICE LOCAL BOARD NUMBER 6, NY

    301 F. Supp. 168 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 7, 1969

    E. g., Cook v. United States, 288 U.S. 102 , 53 S.Ct. 305 (1933); Johnson v. Browne, 205 U.S. 309 , 27 S.Ct. 539 , 51 L.Ed. 816 (1907); United States v. … And in Clark v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Martin v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

    1 F.2d 603 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 6, 1924

    The first point has already been decided against the contention of the plaintiff in the eases of Porter v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation (D. C.) 284 Fed. 397 , and Hill v. … United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation (D. C.) 284 Fed. 398 . The second point falls within the reasoning of my recent decision in the case of Beer, Administratrix, v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Skybound, LLC

    District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 1, 2023

    See LeSane v. Hall’s Sec. … .”); Lucas v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • National Labor Relations Board v. C.C.C. Associates, Inc.

    197 F. Supp. 535 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 12, 1961

    The board’s jurisdiction is determined by the board in the first instance and reviewed by the Court of Appeals pursuant to the comprehensive statutory scheme. Perkins v. … S. 501 , 63 S.Ct. 339 , 87 L.Ed. 424 ; Tobin v. Banks & Rumbaugh, 5 Cir., 1953, 201 F.2d 223 ; N. L. R. B. v. Roddy Mfg. Co., D.C.E.D.Tenn.1958, 165 F.Supp. 412 . Petition granted. So ordered.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Microsoft Corporation

    District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 1, 2019

    Apple Corporation, ECF 1:19-CV-6648, 2 (filed July 16, 2019); Brown v. HP Inc., ECF 1:19-CV-6331, 2 (filed July 8, 2019); Brown v. CUCS, ECF 1:19-CV-6330, 2 (filed July 8, 2019); Brown v. … Fios, ECF 1:19- CV-6329, 2 (filed July 8, 2019); Brown v. Automattic, ECF 1:19-CV-6328, 2 (filed July 8, 2019); Brown v. Rosen, ECF 1:19-CV-6786, 2 (filed July 22, 2019); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Pfizer Inc. Derivative Securities Litigation

    503 F. Supp. 2d 680 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 17, 2007

    ’s Science and Technology Committee (Brown, Ikenberry and Raines), 6) Were not members of the Board’s Compensation Committee (Brown, Burt, Cornwell, Gray, Horner, Howell, Ikenberry, McKinnell, Simmons, Steere and Valles), … 7) Received compensation for service on the Board (entire board), 8) Were members of the Board’s Corporate Governance Committee (Brown, Gray, Horner, Ikenberry and Simmons), 9) Were not members of the Corporate Governance

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 30, 2023

    LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Petitioner Edwin Brown, who was convicted in United States v. … Brown, No. 17-CR-0710- 02 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y.), is currently on supervised release in the Southern District of Florida.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. United States

    District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 16, 2022

    Elijah Brown was a member of a violent Bronx-based gang that trafficked in narcotics and engaged in violence. … He relies on United States v. Taylor, 142 §.Ct. 2015 (2022), and United States v. Davis, 139 S.Ct. 2319 (2019). The motion is entirely without merit for multiple reasons. [.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • A.D. v. Board of Education of the City School District

    690 F. Supp. 2d 193 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 9, 2010

    S.S. v. … In reaching this decision, the IHO concluded that the standard set forth in Board of *204 Education v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Commodity Futures Trading v. American Board of Trade, Inc.

    473 F. Supp. 1177 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 13, 1979

    British American Commodity Options Corp. v. Bagley, supra, 552 F.2d at 491—92. Defendants must comply with it. See Kelley v. … Rosenthal v. Bagley, 450 F.Supp. 1120, 1124-25 (N.D.Ill.1978). 15 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Rogers v. New York City Board of Elections

    988 F. Supp. 409 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 29, 1997

    Gordon, Executive Director of the Campaign Finance Board at ¶7. This goal is obviously legitimate. See California Med. Assoc. v. … Burson v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • British Airways Board v. Port Authority of New York

    431 F. Supp. 1216 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 11, 1977

    Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners, 374 U.S. 424, 430 , 83 S.Ct. 1759, 1763 , 10 L.Ed.2d 983 (1963), quoting, Florida Avocado Growers v. Paul, 373 U.S. 132, 141 , 83 S.Ct. 1210 , 10 L.Ed.2d 248 (1963). … V.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Kerry Inc.

    District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 7, 2022

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JACLYNN BROWN, individually and on … GARDEPHE, U.S.D.J.: In this putative class action, Plaintiff Jaclynn Brown claims that Defendant Oregon Chai’s advertising for its Chai Tea Latte is false and misleading

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • O'Brien v. Board of Education of City School District

    86 F.R.D. 548 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 19, 1980

    See SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp., 70 F.R.D. 508, 522 (D.Conn.1976) (Newman, J.); Georgia Pacific Plywood Co. v. United States Plywood Corp., 18 F.R.D. 463 (S.D.N.Y.1956) (Kaufman, J.); United States v. … United States v. Silverman, 430 F.2d 106, 122 (2d Cir. 1970). See Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 639 (2d Cir. 1963).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Winkelman v. General Motors Corporation

    44 F. Supp. 960 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 10, 1942

    The authorization required was that of the Board itself. Mr. Brown made the exchange with Mr. … Brown. N.Y. Civil Practice Act former § 48, subd. 3. Goldstein v. Tri-Continental Corp., 282 N.Y. 21, 29 , 24 N. E.2d 728 ; Potter v. Walker, 276 N.Y. 15 , 11 N.E.2d 335 .

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. Board of Education of City School District of New Rochelle

    195 F. Supp. 231 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 31, 1961

    Indeed, the Supreme Court, in Brown v. … to nothing less than “full compliance” with the mandate of Brown v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Hill v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

    284 F. 398 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 30, 1922

    See, too, Sloan Shipyards Corporation v. U. S. S. B. E. F. C. (D. C.) 272 Fed. 132 , and Astoria Marine Iron Works v. U. S. S. B. E. F. C., 258 U. S. -, 42 Sup. Ct. 386, 66 L. … Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. McCabe (C. C. A. 2d Circuit) 250 Fed. 699 , 163 C. C. A. 31 , and Orr v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. (D. C.) 242 Fed. 608 , are relied upon.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Zimmer-Thomson Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    60 F. Supp. 84 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 31, 1945

    See Switchmen’s Union v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297, 300, 303 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 ; General Committee v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. … National Mediation Board, App.D.C., 141 F.2d 366 , certiorari dismissed 323 U.S. 166 , 65 S.Ct. 222 ; Reilly v. Millis, App.D.C., 144 F.2d 259 ; Millis v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hahn v. Breed

    587 F. Supp. 1369 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 30, 1984

    Sperry Rand Corp., 586 F.2d 949, 951 (2d Cir.1978) (court compares facts of instant case with facts in Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DASA Corp., 524 F.2d 811 (2d Cir.1975)); Gould v. American Hawaiian S.S. … Browning Debenture Holders' Committee v. DASA Corp., 560 F.2d 1078, 1084 (2d Cir.1977). 24 . 588 F.2d 400 , 402 (3d Cir.1978). 25 . Rodman v. Grant Foundation, 608 F.2d 64, 71 (2d Cir.1979). See also Gluck v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.