Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.65s
Hicks v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.
14 F.2d 316 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 16, 1926
For an authoritative statement of the rule, and also of the exceptions thereto, it will be sufficient to cite McDonald v. Pless, 238 U. S. 266 , 35 S. Ct. 783 , 59 L. Ed. 1300 , and Mattox v. United States, 146 U. … True, under the terms of this act the defendant was empowered to continue to operate vessels under the direction and supervision of the board; but we have no showing at all that the board did in fact thereafter authorize
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. Building Engines, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 11, 2022
Over the objection of Brown, the Court adopts the R&R’s conclusion that Brown’s Complaint as presently pled fails to state a claim for relief. The R&R is adopted in its entirety and without modification. … Mehiel v. Solo Cup Co., 2005 WL 5750634 (Del. Ch. May 13, 2005) (limiting the term “Company” to that defined by the parties in their agreement).
Cited 0 timesUnknownBartlett v. New York State Board of Law Examiners
2 F. Supp. 2d 388 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 15, 1997
See, e.g., Silverman v. … .”); Price v.
Cited 7 timesPublished37 F. Supp. 836 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 2, 1941
The Local Board has the right to pass upon the question of the registrant’s age. On the question of the age of a registrant, in the case of Brown v. Spelman, D. … Angelus v. Sullivan, 2 Cir., 246 F. 54 ; Brown v. Spelman, supra.
Cited 9 timesPublishedOmnipoint Communications, Inc. v. Village of Tarrytown Planning Board
302 F. Supp. 2d 205 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 16, 2004
Nextel Partners, Inc. v. … [See Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedYonkers Board of Education v. Richmond Children's Center, Inc.
58 B.R. 980 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 6, 1986
Yonkers Board of Education (hereinafter “Yonkers”) appeals from an order of the Bankruptcy Court (Schwartzberg, J.) denying a turnover of funds to it by the Debtor in this Chapter 11 proceeding, Richmond Children’s Center … effect that “[u]pon receipt of monies from the State Education Department pursuant to a claim made under Chapter 721 of the Laws of 1979, the [intermediate care facility] shall within ten days transmit such funds to the [Board
Cited 19 timesPublishedGulino v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF CITY SCHOOL DIST.
234 F. Supp. 2d 324 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 27, 2002
Compare Association of Mexican-American Educators v. … Jacques v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedSelkin v. State Board for Professional Medical Conduct
63 F. Supp. 2d 397 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 3, 1999
Eng v. … Board from holding administrative hearing to determine his fitness to practice medicine); Blake v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedTrugman-Nash, Inc. v. New Zealand Dairy Board
942 F. Supp. 905 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 8, 1996
I need not declare the Dairy Board Act invalid in order to conclude that the defendants’ conduct thereunder violated the Sherman Act. The case at bar may be contrasted with Hunt v. … In Hospital Building Co. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Jan 24, 2024
ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK —_—_—_—— DATE FILED: 1/24/2024 Adrian Brown … In light of the requirements of Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015), the parties must file a joint letter or motion that addresses whether the settlement is fair and reasonable.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Apr 15, 2024
See Jones v. Town of East Haven, 691 F.3d 72, 80 (2d Cir. 2012); Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997) (internal citations omitted). … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownNational Credit Union Administration Board v. RBS Securities Inc.
112 F. Supp. 3d 61 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 15, 2015
Stat. 5/12(G) (“Illinois Blué Sky Law”)» by plaintiff National Credit Union Administration Board (“NCUA”) for failure to plead the element of reliance. … In Foster v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Feb 14, 2024
See Wolinsky v. Scholastic, Inc., 900 F. Supp. 2d 332, 335-36 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). … Aguilar v. Tacos Grand Cent., Inc., No. 21-CV-01963 (AT), 2023 WL 2644285, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 2023) (citing Gonzales v. 27 W.H. Bake, LLC, No. 15-CV-04161, 2018 WL 1918623, at *4 (S.D.N.Y.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Jan 31, 2024
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LAMAR BROWN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 22 Civ. 9068 (JHR) -v.- … Accordingly, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and the Court’s inherent power, see Link v. Wabash R.R.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Jan 2, 2024
In light of the decision of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Cheeks v. … In Mei Xing Yu v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Jul 13, 2023
Baptiste v. Sommers, 768 F.3d 212, 216 (2d Cir. 2014); accord Traore v. New York City Dep't of Corr., No. 22 Civ. 1429, 2023 WL 4187906, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. June 26, 2023). … Drake v. Norden Sys., Inc., 375 F.3d 248, 254 (2d Cir. 2004).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · May 9, 2023
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ALTAUNE BROWN, Plaintiff, -against- Case No. 1:23-cv-03522 (JLR) SJCRIVA, INC., and 201 CLINTON … See e.g., Calcano v. Swarovski N. Am. Ltd., 36 F.4th 68, 77-78 (2d Cir. 2022); Harty v. W. Point Realty, Inc., 28 F.4th 435, 443-44 (2d Cir. 2022).
Cited 0 timesUnknownSmith v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.
2 F.2d 390 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 10, 1924
In Sloan Shipyards v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, 258 U. S. 568 , 42 S. Ct. 389 , 66 L. … Sloan Shipyards v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, supra. An interlocutory decree is granted to each libelant, with the customary reference.
Cited 9 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Aug 3, 2023
See Singh v. … (Compl. n.79) (citing Langan v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownNational Board of Marine Underwriters v. Bowring & Co.
148 F. 1010 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 5, 1906
This action was brought by the National Board of Marine Underwriters against Bowring & Company and Johnson and Henjes, the charterer and owner of the lighter Boaz to recover the 'value of 428 casks of dried fish lost or destroyed … After some delay the fish were raised and placed upon a wharf but they were found to be in such a bad condition that they were condemned by the Board of Health as putrid and dangerous to the public health and destroyed under
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna